Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 10

Writer of the Year

Guildensternenstein (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6 Nazi Footballing Douches

• Nom and For.There is absolutely no need to remind you of how many featured articles this person has written during the year of 2009--    00:12, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

• Decisions Decisions. I was cought up between sog and guildy and how I wish I could vote twice, but my vote goes to guildy I guess... Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 11:55, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

• For. While I admire Sog1970 greatly for writing some great articles, and one of the first articles that I really enjoyed (and pee-reviewed...illegally), I'd have to give it to Guildmeister for writing tons of articles I really liked, most notably, The MGS series, Barack Obama's teleprompter, David Lynch, Quentin Tarantino, and Sergio Leone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matfen815 (talk • contribs)

• Douchebag. Jenny? 04:28,3January,2010

• 1/2 For As I'm split between two very worthy candidates, I'm giving half my vote here. Many laugh out loud moments, and one of the writers I find it hardest to review as everything he does is top notch before I get a look at it. Pup
  • I'm pretty sure you're not allowed to do that... -RAHB 00:54, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pick a horse. Just one. Yes, Uncyclopedians are horses. Whinny! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:09, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
    • For Okay, I'm giving a full vote to Guildy, because he came first in the alphabet. Pup
• You have to. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 20:45, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hyperbole (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 23

• Nom - one of the more talented writers I had the pleasure of encountering. Silly, drunk and somewhat handsome, makes him one hell of a writer. ~ 00:24, January 1, 2010 (UTC)...And For. He's an idiot. But he's our idiot. ~ 13:33, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
• For In Spirit, since he's obviously won anyways. Heez mai heero. sausage lol 07:21, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

  Oy, Colin, choose one and stick with one - as Modus has said elsewhere, you can't split Uncyclopedians down the middle. Be unequivocal with your love, or don't love at all. Also, just because it took, like, more than two weeks to say this, doesn't make it any less valid. So there. --UU - natter 10:44, Jan 21

• Awww, I wanted to nominate him... Man you guys are fast!  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 07:42, 1 January 2010
• per above he has 33.5 featured articles, 35.5 if you include those written under sockpuppets and/or the influence of alcohol. --Mn-z 00:33, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Yeah, what they said. One of my favorite writers.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 02:26, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Dear Sweet God Yes. -RAHB 13:00, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Welp. I was torn between Hype and Sog for this as they're both deserving of the award. I gave my vote to Sog, but I wouldn't be upset to see Hype win either. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:36, 2 Jan
• For --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 18:36, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Yes. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:22, Jan 2
• At laaaaasst ♪...... My lo-oo-ove has come along ♫.......... IronLung 20:35, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Strong for. Definitely one of the funniest people here. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 23:30, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
• Strong For. Due respect to Guildy and the rest, but Hype is one of the best things to happen to this site. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 01:04, Jan 3 2010
• For. It's Hype. It has to be Hype - he knows funny, simple as that. Dragon Warrior is my favourite article of the year by a distance, and he's written so many of my favourite articles on this site that I can't vote for anyone else this year. Mhaille not having won this award is going to be Uncyc's equivalent of Hitchcock not getting the best Director Oscar; Guildy has had a stellar year; Sog delivers consistent quality; the other nominees are all excellent writers - but Hype has delivered more genuine laugh out loud moments than anyone else, and I salute him! --UU - natter 09:32, Jan 3
• For. Gah. ☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃ 12:34 January 4
• Dig the golden endorsement. Let it be noted that I saw his greatness from very early on, and were I still slumming around here on a more-than-passive basis, I'm sure we would've written some great works together. However, as I have ascended, I'll just sum up my praise as such: Hyperbole gets it, presents it brilliantly, and makes me fucking laugh. Welcome to the executive lounge my friend; your monogrammed smoking jacket awaits you in the cigar parlour. --THINKER 03:19, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
• Reluctant for. I had my Randomator randomly choose a writer to vote for and it chose Hyperbole, which is really unfortunate since it is widely known that he is the worst writer on the entire internets, ever. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 04:11, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• For Great writer and very funny, but his greatest strength is that he comes up with great ideas and angles on the subjects he chooses. There were a few too many features last year that were very well written with great presentation and nicely laid out references that just weren't exciting, interesting or original; this man's are. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:16, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• For Hype is just really, really funny, and I always look forward to reading what he's written. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 14:41, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Hype had my vote last year and nothing has changed. Still the funniest writer currently contributing to this site. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  18:50, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• yea i gues hes prty kkk00l --Roman Dog Bird 23:02, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• For There are so many good writers who deserve a vote for, however I don't think it would be right not to vote for Hyperbole who appears to have been writing the highest quality stuff over the entire year and before. --Nikau 13:37, January 14, 2010 (UTC)
• For I think he might have helped out with a few other things also... MrN  Fork you! 06:08, Jan 17
• FlorHave been a noob for awhile, and now I know what some of the fuss is about. Besides, this will push him over 20 and into the realm of the floating mountains. Aleister in Chains Guy Fawkes Day, MMX
• For. As tempting and totally futile as the good ol' Self-For is, I've got to throw my lot in with Hyperbole. He wrote twenty features in '09, including what will almost certainly become the top article of '09. Oh, and he had the top article for '08, too. Oh, and he's the fourth-most featured author all-time (and will probably head that list before too long). So yeah. Plus the one edit he made to my MGS article is funnier than just about every edit I've made to it. And, to top it all off, he's a pretty cool dude to boot. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:45, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Damn it, I am tired of motherfucking Hyperbole making me motherfucking laugh! -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 21:53, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Every single nominee on this page deserves recognition for their massive writing skills. Every single one of them. They've all had a huge amount of features. They've all left a mark on Uncyclopedia history. But out of all these great writers, I think Hype has left the biggest mark on Uncyclopedia history. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:51, 31 January 2010

Sog1970 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7

• Nom - You don't really hear much about Sog. And that is because the guy doesn't do anything but churning out quality pieces. He writes `em good, he writes `em plenty and he is one of the nicer people around here. All in all, a winning combination. ~ 00:28, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Bless. As per above. Also, this guy's style of humour is my favourite. Guildy and Hype are excellent writers, no doubt, but Sog.. is OUTSTANDING SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME • 08:59 • Friday, 1-01-2010
• For My little bro and author of More featured articles than I can count without first removing my shoes and socks and counting my toes. My Mother really liked Lady-Gardening -- I'mthedaddy 17:43, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For Since I first saw Soggy's writings, I have been a fan of his work.He deserves the award in my view. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:15, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For I always try to avoid reviewing his articles these days, since almost every single one is feature worthy before it comes to PEE review. It is always a pleasure to read his work which makes him more than deserving of this award. Guildy and Hype are both brilliant writers but Sog has impressed me time and time again with his writing and that gets him my vote. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:39, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Strong for. Ever since appearing on the radar this guy has done nothing but churn out quality articles at an alarming rate. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:33, 2 Jan
• For this guy. Props to Hyperbole, and I almost did vote for that guy because he is very very good, but Sog narrowly edges out. And while I do admire Guildenisniteninkienien for his dedication to rewriting the same 3 articles over and over again and getting them mechanically featured as if it were routine, Sog came equally out of nowhere and proved to be unique, diverse, and much more talented. But Hyperbole rules too. But so does this guy. Also, Mhaille is awesome. He needs more votes too. But Sog should win because he's the best. But if not him, then Hyperbole. Or Mhaille. But definitely Sog. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:35, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • First of all, I write the same six articles over and over again, get it right. Secondly, insulting me unprovoked for no reason won't change the fact that no one likes you, nor will it make your erect penis any longer than 3-and-a-third inches, so you should probably just cut the shit. Asshat. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:32, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
    • I expect we might be in for another video posting by the Bearded One.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:04, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
      • Oh no, I'm done with that due to the fact that I recently shaved my beard. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:46, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
        • Infamy is a hell of a lot better than being ignored. Sigh! Pup
          • I like TKF. -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:32, 8 Jan
            • I would like TKF, but unfortunately he has this odd habit of being a dickweed to everyone but about eight users. So yeah. My guess is no one ever hugged him. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:19, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
              • You blew it with the Youtube; TKF rules! mAttlobster. (hello) 00:14, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
                • Leaving that aside, Guildy has written some truly fucking hilarious material for us and suggesting that it's repetitive or "mechanically featured" is just uncalled for, IMHO. pillow talk 00:52, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
                  • Yeah, I did blow it with the Youtube. And thank you, Hype, your kind words are appreciated. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:56, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

  You're a twat, Thekillerfroggy. Cheer up or fuck off. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:32, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

  You're a blast, TKF. Not when you're talking trash about Guildy though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:17, 24 January 2010

• For Since Hyperbole has already won, I may as well shamelessly vote for myself. --Sog1970 09:30, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nomination and Vote - There are always popular writers, very few can claim to have shaped how the sites articles have formed, nor had such a track record of having some of the best material on the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:24, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For - This is for writing, amongst many many great articles, my favourtie of them all: Prog Rock. --Thehallway 17:58, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
• Full For, so he can go down fighting. As much as I do love Hype, I fucking loved Bi-curious George. sausage lol 22:51, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

  Oy, Colin, choose one and stick with one - as Modus has said elsewhere, you can't split Uncyclopedians down the middle. Be unequivocal with your love, or don't love at all. --UU - natter 10:42, Jan 21

Orian57 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom+For Had 16 featured articles, and of those three were featured on consecutive days. There's no reason for him to not be nominated for Writer of the Year. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (22:50 01-1-2010)
• Comment I'll wait untill I've cought up on some of the recent features before I go blowing my own cock, but I would like to say that I'm thrilled to be nomminated. :D    Orian57    Talk   01:39 2 January 2010
• Easiest For vote I ever made. User:Fag/sig5 22:04, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• 1/2 For Although he's been a little quieter over the past couple of months, Orian is one of the writers I look forward to reading, and greatly admire. Pup
  • Pick a horse. Just one. Yes, Uncyclopedians are horses. Whinny! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:09, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
    • Poo! Pup
• Further comment I'm warm fuzzy feeling :D    Orian57    Talk   17:49 4 January 2010

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom. Not going to vote yet, but Puppy's written some friggin' awesome stuff, and deserves at least to be nominated. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:16, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment As much as I'm honoured to be nommed, I'm actually torn between voting for Guildy, Sog, Orian, Hyperbole, and MacMania. So... ummm... all bribes are happily accepted. Pup

  I'll be your fuck-pig.    Orian57    Talk   19:58 2 January 2010

  I'm never eating bacon again. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 03:47, Jan 3 2010

  All the bribes are in... How do you have a half fuck pig? Pup

• For I don't find myself enough competent to judge who is best here as I joined the project near the end of the year but... I feel sorry for Puppy who's been whitewashed (till now).... Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 20:32, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• FORE! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 10:31, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
• abstain. carrot lol 13:09 January 15

GlobalTourniquet (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. So does this guy. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:16, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Spiritual Support. Hyperbole has my vote, which really sucks because I'd love to vote for GT. So if any of you just happen to hate Hyperbole for some reason, I urge you to vote for GlobalTourniquet. Alfred Hitchcock is one of my favorite articles of the year. Fuck it, one of my favorites in any year. And God dammit GT, when I get back from Florida we're having that fucking Gin and Tonic. -RAHB 13:00, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

MacMania (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. And this guy, even if he hasn't and won't be around for ages. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:16, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

DrStrange (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. I haven't been around long enough to study everyone's complete work and vote, but the good Doctor has written many of the best articles I've read here and well deserves, imnho, a nomination for this shiny bucket. Aleister in Chains

Monika (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom. she made the bleach arctcle into lame into LAMO i couldt dtop laf\phing after i read what she wrote. and its not just funny but extremely clever. --Metallavery 05:28, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• TKF is the writer that all writers look up to. Constantly coming out with one article after the next that is almost universally admired, and constantly being featured. At the same time he treats everyone here with the highest level of respect and always gives feedback in the most constructive manner. I wish I was more like him, and hung like a horse like he is as well. Pup
• It seems like only yesterday when he wrote "This man is so obvious. We should discontinue this award" on my NOTM - which inspired me with confidence like I'd never felt before. I owe all of my features to this man, the originator of the Uncyclopedia Mendoza Line, he is both my muse and prophet. Unfortunately, In a moment of weakness, I already nommed Guildy and my shame shall torment me eternally. I shall now flog myself.--    22:04, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom Shopping list, Hyperdrinking, Gazelle, Jesus Christ, who brought that guitar?, HowTo:Be A Supervillain, UnScripts:Average Cop... Under user at least deserves a mention here. --Nikau 08:36, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• Has UU won this before? carrot lol 13:11 January 15

  Heh. Yeah, that's my name up there on the list of previous winners. Just below Mhaille's. --UU - natter 09:26, Jan 16

RAHB (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom lol. carrot lol 13:11 January 15

Uncyclopedian of the Year

Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 15

• Nom - if I may, in the most platonic way possible, the man is a true gem. Other than being a very able admin, he manages to go around doing his thing in the nicest way possible, always helping when asked and never loses his temper. Did a grand job with the PEE company and with the UnSignPost alongside normal maintenance and writing. Give the man a round of applause. ~ 00:10, January 1, 2010 (UTC)...and For. If only for fixing my atrocious spelling over and over again. Oh, and for being the UU that he is. ~ 13:36, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
• For.--He's just awesome. Eelpop
• For.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:55, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For.--An admin and writer who takes his work seriously but always with humour and recognition that he can be fallible too. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:34, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Very helpful and polite; he definitely has my vote. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 00:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
• He does his thang, and he does it right. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:25, Jan 2
• This guy has been my favorite user ever since Down with this sort of thing! Through the years, he has always come through as a very sensible, very nice, and very funny. You go, UU. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 01:00, Jan 3 2010
• Yes indeed. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:49, 03 Jan 2010
• Kay. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 07:41, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Keeps his head when all around are losing theirs, is helpful and works hard. What a guy. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:18, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 18:40, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. This man is like Superman.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 07:56, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. This man is like, er... Wonderwoman. ☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃ 12:32 January 4

  It's the hotpants, isn't it? --UU - natter 13:01, Jan 4

• For - --Thehallway 18:21, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
• For - This was tough for me. Socky's contributions are well known, of course. And I don't think Spang, or Modus get the credit they deserve. But UU gets it for me. But UU has been great around this place too. He is usually quite active, an extremely approachable admin (which is quite nice), and is always around to help with the site, having good, adult insights on the dramas that happen around here, and very rarely gets brought down by the crap that gets slung around him (and if he does, I just don't see it.). And for all that, I think he deserves the award this year. Good day. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:14, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom- the prince of pants, who is a bit absent lately unfortunately, is another fine example of why the world would have been better have the British Empire did not collapse. An office and a gentlemen, dealing with vandals and blankers with his tweed pants on while waving his elegant cane at their head. A monocle and a bow tie complete his attire of this perfect example of an English admin, even if he does use the word dude a bit too much. ~ 00:14, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

MadMax (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

• Nom Do I really have to explain? He's the only person who deserves to win this twice. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:15, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He's still at it. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:24, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He's a good user. DW 18:09, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Make that "Good-natured Uncyclopedian of the Year".--Funnybony 14:46, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
• Tough choice year in year out, the fact that after five long, long, long years MadMax is still plugging away is a testiment in itself. That his contributions are almost universally overlooked saddens me greatly. VERY FOR. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• Flour I can't stand it anymore, everytime I look in recent changes MadMax is all over the place fixing and editing and writing and commenting and adding graphics, and apparantly he's been doing this for years! There's nothing wrong with the other nominess, all of them are amazing, friendly, and helpful as far as I can tell, but I'm voting for a second MVP award for this deserving bot. Aleister in Chains Groundhog Day, MMX

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 15

• Nom This guy is the next admin, no contest. That is if we ever get a new one. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:15, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Helped me more than anybody else. He's (one of) my favourite user(s). Period. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME • 11:33 • Friday, 1-01-2010
• For. per above, and has over 35 thousand edits. --Mn-z 00:25, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Tough decision, I was torn between UU, Spang, and Socky. But 35 thousand edits?! And of the nominees, other than Mn-z, he's been here the least amount of time, so I think as far as stuff done-to-time to do so ratio, Socky takes more than the cake. He takes the whole damn dessert tray! And here I was promising my date one of those chocolate eclairs. But no. Socky took it. He took everything. Even those little frozen cream puffs. I don't know where he puts it all. -RAHB 13:10, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Actually, Socky's earliest edit is even newer than mine. --Mn-z 19:04, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Tough call, what with UU, MadMax and Spang also nommed. In the end I settled on Socky because he's been consistantly busting his ass with maintainance since he signed up. Plus he's a good dude and I love his username. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:13, 2 Jan
• Fuck Yes. Jenny? 04:24,3January,2010
• Yes. My heart was torn between few candidates but the dices decided. G'd f'r y S'ck'! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 23:27, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• FOR GOATSE, GOD AND ALL OF THE CLAN! Socky is part of Goa Tse Clan like me. Good writer. Vote for him or you will DIE! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 10:37, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Basically per what RAHB said. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:25, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Join Us 01:14, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
• For. It was between Socky and UU. Socky won my vote based on a photo finish involving a loose thread.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 06:47, 11 January 2010
• For. --Docile hippopotamus 09:59, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Bloody heck. That was a tricky choice. UU already knows how awesome I know he is. Well Socky does 2... MrN  Fork you! 05:53, Jan 17
• For. Socky's stuff roxes my soxes, so there. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 00:49 EST 23 January, 2010
• For. Socky deserves this. Now he's almost to UU! HELPME
• For. Really tough decision between sock and UU.--    23:47, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment. I could still vote for myself, ya know. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:58, 31 January 2010

  NO! Don't do it! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:59, 31 January 2010

• Comment. Edit Conflict! I was just about to suggest a 23:59 edit war for kicks!--    00:01, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

RabbiTechno (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• Nom - other than being a certified Rabbi, our surviving poopsmith has been dealing with the never ending crapflood day and night. Always nice and helpful doing one of the most ungrateful jobs around Uncyc tirelessly. ~ 00:19, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

  What do you mean "surviving poopsmith" as if I weren't around? Just cause he or MadMax often beat me to archiving? Well? Do you want me to die or something, you sonvabitch? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:30, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

  Yes. ~ 00:32, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

  All right. Just making sure we're on the same page. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:33, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

• For. sausage lol 07:23, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Strong For The nicest user I have met on Uncyclopedia so far, not taking away from anyone else though. --Nikau 01:25, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. If MrN hadn't gone missing, this may have been closer, but it's the Rabbi for me. It's the little things he does - taking the time to leave a helpful, friendly tip on pretty much every ICU he applies is a good example - this is a guy who doesn't just maintain, he helps out and encourages. I remember back when I hadn't been here long, I tidied up an apostrophe or two in an article, and got a huge friendly template on my talk page from RT - really helped me settle in. That's the RT difference. --UU - natter 09:26, Jan 3
• For basically everything in the first half of what UU said, combined with everything in the first half of what Nikau said. User:Fag/sig5 09:50, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Mordillo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nomination. The admin that has survived every kind of drama, for which I respect him an immense deal. He has also continued exercising his many administrative duties throughout the year. Basically, he's one of the people that keep the site running on a continuous basis. Also, he won this award last year. Even if he doesn't win it again, he definitely deserves this nomination. Give it up for Mordillo! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:01, 1 January 2010

  Mister Moardildos here told me to go down, though, not up. He's a man, dammit! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:05, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

• For There are a lot of people who deserve to win this, so with all due respect to those people (you know who you are), here goes: Uncyclopedia is the worst, but Dildos puts up with it and keeps coming back for more, and how he manages to do that and still maintain his sanity (just a little bit of it, mind you) is beyond me. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 08:15, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• 4, and a strong one. --User:Jack Phoenix/sig 17:46, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For I can always count on Mordillo to give me shit, and deservedly so.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 22:05, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Mnbvcxz (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and for. Beyond all the various site maintenance he does, and beyond rarely missing an opportunity to vote on anything, Mnbvcxz is sort of the tireless gardener and cultivator of Uncyclopedia in-jokes. Which may make people roll their eyes at him sometimes. But it also means he has a real affection and passion for this site which is hard to match. Plus, he practically lives here. Does the guy ever sleep? pillow talk 19:14, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

In my defense somebody else was responsible for mainspacing that one thing --Mn-z 00:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Spang (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom The go-to-guy for most of the coding and site maintenance around here. How many of us have had issues with coding, Wikia/site fuck-ups, and getting things to work, go to Spang, and have him give you the answer quickly, and allowing us coding idiots the ability to understand what in the hell he's talking about? Whenever something goes wrong with this place, he is THE guy to go to, and has been for a while. For that, at the very least, he deserves a nom. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:34, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Roman Dog Bird (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom - Energizer bunny on hard drugs. Trash basher, vandal basher, QVFD basher, bashers basher. In the darkest hours of Uncyclopedia, RDB was there, bashing the terror away. ~ 17:52, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• A glittering beacon of unending admiration for this guy. Gets shit done and keeps it real. There is nothing else you need to do to get UotY, and this guy does both in spades, with flying colors, and better than anybody else, and when I think about him I touch myself. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:18, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0

• Nomination. I know I've been hard on MO in the past for "doing nothing" and "being useless" and also "horrible and unfunny" and "sucks cock like a champ", but it turns out that I was proved wrong for the very first time when I realized that he is quite the opposite of "doing nothing" and "useless" and "horrible and unfunny" and... well, that's it. Basically, he should get some votes, because he's the paste that holds this community's fragmented sanity together. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 10:09, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
• Yup, and he introduced all of us to mybrute.] carrot lol 13:14 January 15

  That was TheLedBalloon, actually. I just made it erotic. Terribly so. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:24, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Gerrycheevers (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Would-have-been for Until Gerry disappeared near the end of the year, he was my hands down winner of this award. The guy single-handedly kept the USP up and running, and was consistantly funny while doing it. He was a huge contributer to PEEing, pretty much re-wrote that other thing that has slipped my mind right now (On this day...? Anniversaries? I can't remember), and still found time to populate our land with new, hilarious articles the entire time. If he hadn't left, this vote would have been his. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:22, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

  What he said. Every last word of it. Where are you Gerry? --UU - natter 13:16, Jan 15

  Oh balls. I was gonna do this, but then, well, what y'all said. Also, for WotY too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:45, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Electrified mocha chinchilla (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nomination. He was asking for it, kinda. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:36, 31 January 2010
• For. Did I win yet? --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:41 Jan 31 2010

January 2010

Writer of the Month

Nameable (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 12

• Nom/For I'm sorry but lets not waste this month on someone with 1 feature... waste it instead on someone with 4 features he is much more deserving of this and writes good stuff. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 14:54, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Good call Acrolo - Nameable has written several good features, and also written a bunch of other decent articles too (it's not all about the features, y'know). He keeps his head down and just does his thang, but I appreciate that, and I like his stuff. --UU - natter 17:26, Jan 9
• I too enjoy what he writes. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:36, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
• For. UnScripts:The Rapid And The Ragey was one of my favorite articles to grace this wiki in several months. pillow talk 18:18, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
• For Sadly Asahatter seems to be missing for now, so I'll shift my vote here to someone deserving of the award. --Nikau 00:15, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
• For I've always liked him, and Corn Flakes is one of my personal favorites. Staircase CUN^t 01:54, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
• For I've always enjoyed his presence. -

  Kingkitty ~Fuck you Brett~ ~Die in a fire Favre~

• For. I looked what Nikau had sad, was confused, checked Ass's contributions, and realized he hadn't done anything here since August of 2009. Due to this discovery, I will be voting for Nameable. Yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:59, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
• For Cornflakes, Cornflakes, Cornflakes, Cornflakes, Cornflakes, Cornflakes, Cornflakes, Cornflakes, Cornflakes, you'll never win Vivian, it's only nine words.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 18:39, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
• Also better than whatshisface -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:01, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
• For Writes enjoyable..... articles! That's the word. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:54, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
• For. ~ 13:37, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Asahatter (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom/For As per last month, Printer Ink, BBC Radio 4 and his many other hilarious articles. --Nikau 09:37, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Just flat-out more deserving than the other nominees in my opinion. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:12, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• For.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:00, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

Colin "All your base" Heaney (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nom&For. He wrote an actual article. And then it got ACTUALLY FEATURED User:Fag/sig5 09:30, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

*For. He wrote an article, it got featured. For Colin, that's like being Steven King. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:21, 6 Jan

• Better than whatshisface. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:19, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
• For, I guess. sausage lol 18:29, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
• YES The Zimbabwean Government Should Cease Existence. Robert Mugabe can go die, too. Fuck Zimbabwe., thanks Colin for being such an inspiration for my Polish Nonsensopedia sig!

Hah! Oddly enough, you were the inspiration for my current signature. sausage lol 20:48, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

• For. - This vote isn't for Colin, but for everyone who has achieved greatness through dumb luck. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 01:37, Jan. 12, 2010

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0 Zombiebaron

• Nom. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 09:51, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

Anyone but Colin "All your base" Heaney

Score: 1

• NF sausage lol --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 02:20, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

  Uz juss jellus cuz i one surviver. sausage lol 23:19, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

  Invalid nom. Trained burro or no, veers off the trail of civil discourse (by the general standards of this page, anyway) and perilously close to the precipice of Drama canyon, carved out over the millenia by the river of Unkind Words. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:50, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

  You're gay. pillow talk 18:15, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

  That still doesn't explain why you're spooning me. Or perhaps it does. In any event, I need cab money. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:31, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

DrStrange (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 12 mad doctors

• Nom&For. Now, let me be the first to say that winning WotM twice has never happened before, but I don't think any of the nominated candidates are worthy of this award (and I mean no personal offense). DrStrange, however, has been cranking out feature after feature this month. Truly, he has been this month's writer of the month. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 08:52, Jan 13 2010
• For. Doc's steroid-driven run of 5 featured in 10 days (and 3 in a row), may signal that the worthy tradition of this award as a Hall-of-Fame vote has ended and that from now on it's back to its literal "Best Writer of the Month" Oscar status. Aleister in Chains July 4, 1776
• For. Now that's more like it. A writer who truly deserves this award. Its alway nice to give people who don't have the award before those who already do, but to be fair, they should at least be able to stand on their own 2 feet properly in the first place. Dr. Strange has my vote. --Matfen 20:31, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Per his mad string of features. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:06, 15 Jan
• For. Dr. Strange has been cracking me up lately.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 05:46, 16 January 2010
• For. He has been on a great run of late. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:34, January 16, 2010 (UTC)
• For!--(YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans) 17:22, January 17, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Outstanding. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 18:21 • Sunday, 17-01-2010
• For.. I looked at his user page and found out he's written most of my favorite articles. I really hope he wins.

HELPME 18:49, January 17, 2010 (UTC)HELPME

• For. Tie-breaking my ego. sausage lol 22:33, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
• Bless. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:53, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He's right about the vortex' ya know... MrN  Fork you! 12:14, Jan 31

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Why do I need to provide this? (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• Nom As per last month, and the month before... Pup (reserving my right to not vote yet...)

  And For Pup

• For There's some serious deja vu on these award pages. --Matfen 15:59, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He got second place two months in a row now it's his turn! He got his first three articles featured including one last month, did the second most Pee Reviews for three months in a row, welcomed many users, and is very sweet. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:46, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. per above. --Mn-z 01:58, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• 3/4 flour, the three-quarters vote as a Why homage. As Why moves up in the que this should be, imnho, by acclamation. A nice guy and hard worker, and I love, adore, his conversation with the Little Mermaid sockpuppet on "her" talk page. Well deserved. Aleiser in Chains
• Absolutely. Guy got robbed last month. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 00:06, Jan 3 2010
• Fifteen-sixteenths for. The other sixteenth goes to a fictional character named Jenkins. I think I've voted for Why? about three times now. Great Uncyclopedian. pillow talk 19:28, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
• For ..and not just because he adopted me...he's dedicated, and gives great reviews, that are honest, and will make you frustrated at how not funny you are, and how terrible your grammar is. --Puffskein 01:46, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
• For 0.3125 only because I like natural numbers. And because I won't vote for anyone else in UotM, then consider it 100% of my vote, Herr Why. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 20:59, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Really the only ones nominated that I have seen here are him and Zana, and I've never actually said a word to Zana, so... HELPMEHELPME
• For. Per the things above. ~ 16:47, Jan 29, 2010

• Comment. Thanks for the votes so far, and part thanks for the part votes. I believe I've corrected the vote total so it's simple. So if you vote simply add 1 to it. And if you can't or don't want to bother figuring out the math, just vote and some anally-retentive type will come along and fix the math for us. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:47, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

Zana Dark (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 1/4

• Nom and For. Zana just flat out deserves this for everything she's been doing for the past 4 or 5 months. She's been more helpful than ever lately. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 07:43, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• 1/4 flour so I can comment here. Zana is a powerhouse on the site, and if Why wins I expect her to see her shadow in February and get this award. She deserves one or the other. Aleister in Chains

SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom and For. Since he 'came out' and became a regular user over the last four months, Spike has been busy in VFD and also, more importantly, trying rescue a collection of mangy articles that were otherwise destined for destruction.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:51, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

The Woodburninator (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9 Woodys

• N&F. An excellent example of what an Uncyclopedian should be. He's deserved this for a long time now. If all he'd ever done was this he'd still deserve it, but he's also a great writer and an all around good guy to have around. -Opty On Fire! Sexing Opty Stalking Opty
• This guy gives me wood. I'm the King of Originality. sausage lol 22:16, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
• This guy forever. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:20, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
• For. It's really surprising that Woody--and just about every other user nominated this month, actually--hasn't won this yet. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:51, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
• Wood. Well, aside from the fact I can't believe he hasn't already won this award, he's nommed me for it twice. Plus he has the sexiest signature ever.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:04, 8 January 2010

  Funnily, I too have always enjoyed the sig. Though, to be truthful, it was a creation of Cajek, so there is good reason for its awesomeness. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 18:08, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

• For. Voting > Funny. No wait, that's not right. I just can't say it like he can. --UU - natter 17:22, Jan 9
• For. Quality user through and through. Useful all over the site doing good things where good things need to be done. Give me a room full of Woody and I would be a happy man. MrN  Fork you! 02:10, Jan 25
• For Thou remind me of myself.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:53, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
• Woody>Funny ~ 13:39, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Romartus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

• Nom. I've been hard on this guy in the past for his terrible voting habits, but he keeps to himself and dilligently works on his articles. He never starts drama and he's helpful. What more could you ask for in an Uncyclopedian? -OpTimus (talk)14:44, 2 Jan
• Spiritual Support. Romartus is dedicated, polite, and active--just about all you can ask for in an Uncyclopedian, really. I wish him better luck in a month not so full of deserving nominees. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:16, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He voted for me, I'll vote for him, what could be fairer? His panoramic schooling in everything from the Nicene Creed to The Third Man has enriched articles we've created this month to replace garbage awaiting burial via VFD. Spıke Ѧ  01:54 14-Jan-10
• For Always honest in his voting even when he disagrees with everyone else. I'd vote for Why? too if I could, but since he's going to win one month anyway I'll stick with the wanna-be Caesar. --Sog1970 18:57, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
• For Always seems to be polite and honest, and isn't afraid to go against the mould on VFH which, for me, is worthy of a vote. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:06, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

Dannehvirus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

“ ==W-WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT???!!!==
...Damn. Dannehvirus 04:42, January 7, 2010 (UTC) ”

• Nom Per above.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  10 Jan 2010 ~ 07:39 (UTC) Er, yes,
  • He actually does tech qualify for nom, as he has apparantly written articles, they've just all been pulled by the admins! If he ever comes back he's going to go ga-ga over being nominated. (The one vote isn't mine, although tempted. . .) Aleister in Chains Days of our lives, MMX

To clarify, based on history, Happytimes did this as a nom and for. Also by my in facto reading, the nominee does not technically quo pro quo qualify (a nomination for an article) as the nominee hasn't created a new article (at least not one that is not in mortis), but I suppose there may be still time for the said nominee to rectify that situation. And other legal talk. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 00:41, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

• For. To encourage his/her/sock? work and tenure here. Dannyvirus is writing a good tale here and shows promise. And he claimed the title, just like Ali, and look how that turned out (Ali all broken up and unable to walk or talk) Aleister in Chains January 12, The Year of Our Fnord, MMX

His unbook is up, so he's now an official noob. Al McChains Martin Luther King Jr. Boxing Day, MMX

• Yeah. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 08:47, Jan 13 2010
• Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. Vote for the Noob, it's Danneh Ali. 2K12_DAN.VRS 05:28, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
• My little noob has been nominated for Noob of the Month? Of course I'll vote For! --InvincibleFlameGrueMaster 01 20, 05:52, 2010
• For. I took a long time to vote, as we have a couple of excellent noobs here. What put me over the edge was that, very early, Dannehvirus fell into a filthy, vile, stinking <insert name here> pit, and still stayed and wanted to be productive. If you don't get a win, you at least deserve a medal. Either that or you're a glutton for punishment, which also gets my vote. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:36, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

LisaKachold (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 14

• Nom I don't know. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:45, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• FOR Arizona is wildly funny & obnosis is strange and wonderful! A for effort w/proofreads! (shameless self boasting) L!$@ (Meow!)(Contribs) 04:22, 4 January 2010
• For. She shamelessly advertised herself out to me. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 04:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
• For. I don't think I've ever seen a noob write a competent 37,000-byte article before. Apparently, being a very heavy contributor to Wikipedia gave her a pretty good idea of what we do here: and by "what we do here," I mean "write a wiki" more than I mean "dick jokes." To steal the catch phrase of the only other Uncyclopedian I know who uses their real name: dicks lol. Wait, what was I talking about? In conclusion, Pelargonium edit conflicted me and is therefore a bastard. pillow talk 04:52, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
• Yup.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 21:26, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:23, 7 January 2010
• For. per above. --Mn-z 05:15, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Though I wasn't sure about Obnosis, Lisa has shown herself to be interested in writing other work - even though I haven't voted in favour of Work. I trust she sticks around all the same. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:10, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • For info purposes, "Work" is Spike's Aleister in Chains 8 Jan, MMX
    • Oh yes! I seem to be clicking on the wrong history for articles these days. Oops sorry Spike and Lisa. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:46, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
• For <<新年快乐>> 05:05 January 8
• For. Although her noobiness is minimal, she is technically a noob. =D  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 17:59, 9 January 2010
• For. I was friends with a girl named Lisa once. Turned out she was a total bitch. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:54, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

  That's interesting, because I slept with a girl named Lisa once, and several years later, she developed a massive bowel obstruction that caused her to become so constipated that she appeared to be six to eight months pregnant. pillow talk 19:57, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

• For. She's got a great start writing articles, and there's something about her sig that I really really like! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:54, Jan 25
• For. Seems to be doing the right things. --UU - natter 16:58, Jan 25
• Comment. I gave my vote to another, but you've got my zen vote. I'm definitely glad you're here. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:39, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
• For. MrN  Fork you! 12:21, Jan 31
• Yes I've seen her before, and she hasn't won noob of the month already. *CoughRcmurphyCough*—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• N&F January is finally his time to shine. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:44, 2 Jan
• Against. I have great justification for my against vote. I've said it before and I'll say it again: Sophia is one hot potato. And that explains everything.  Father WHY??? (confessions)  19:02, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Koo-koo-ka-choo, Mrs. Robinson! sausage lol 00:18, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
• Za Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 12:11, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Noob of the month is a dumb award anyway, so unless a noob pulls something worthwhile, I'll be voting RcMurphy for life. --Matfen 19:39, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment. Same here. Except when there's ten or more people voting for a noob. carrot lol 13:07 January 15
    • This guy gets it. NotM is a retarded award. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:51, 15 Jan
      • The current notm is an awarded retard. Aleister in Chains 17 Jan. MMX
        • Quite honestly, I never intended to be active here until I got nommed for NotM. Without that nomination, I likely wouldn't still be here. So maybe it was a foolish award. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:42, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
          • And what a disaster that turned out to be. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:57, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
            • Exactly. And who was the person who nominated me? Could it be......Syndrome? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 07:19, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. I hate what he's done with Haiti.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  14 Jan 2010 ~ 08:14 (UTC)
• For. None of the other noobs can measure up to me. —rc (t) 02:43, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
• For. ----Nigger Fucking Faggot Etc x1000 and Shithead N/O/T/FUCKING FUNNYR.D.B. COW! GOTM THING INCEST EATMYSHORTS GAYMUSIC HAWKMAN MF LESCLAY DON'TVOTE 02:40, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Writer of the Month

Sog1970 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

• Nom imnho this award should be voted on the last week of the month, if it's a vote for the Best Writer of that month. And with almost 1/4th of February gone Sog's Little Adolf's School Report seems to already be a classic (see VFHighlight page). Aleister in Chains 17:23 6 Feb. MMX
• For! He already earned my favor I hope that's a word! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:31, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
• YES. Doesn't he have a bunch of articles in the Top 10 of '09? I am for, completely.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 22:37, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For Got to vote for family, "brawdoliaeth" as they say in Machynlleth.--I'mthedaddy 20:59, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
• For More than half the month gone. Unless the Coen Brothers start writing in the next couple of weeks, Sog skates over the finish line, skis the mountain, runs from the luge. Aleister in Chains 15:44 15 Feb. MMX

You seem to have voted twice Aleister?--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:05, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

First was a nom, then later a vote. What do you think this is, Chicago? Aleister in Chains 20:12 ahhhhhhhhh 2012

• For.Without Sog's works, VFH would be a sadder place.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:03, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment. Though Sog is certainly on the shortlist to receive this thing a second time, I really think we should do the what we do with the other awards when it comes to WotM: that is, if there's no viable new candidate, just don't give out an award for that month. Hell, Sonje would have a half-dozen PotM awards if we didn't do that, and Woody about eight AotM templates. That being said, For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:19, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Had little idea who he was - discovered he has writ more features than I have articles (to the best of my memory). Jolly good show, old chap. --nldr 02:59, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
• Absolutely I've reviewed his two featured articles this month and nominated one of them. Without any doubt Sog has been #1 in February --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >}
• Yeppers--    17:47, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Asahatter (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• Nom & for. Per my odd little policy of preferring to reward people who deserve to win an award for the first time ahead of people who may be good but have already won it. Plus, this award isn't just about work in the last month, it has never worked like that. Look at Asahatter's work, and laugh. Then come back here and vote for him. --UU - natter 20:32, Feb 15
• For. Anyone who can make an entertaining article about printer ink has my vote. --Matfen 20:44, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
• Inter Prink -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:54, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Per what UU said. Giving this to him now isn't the most timely thing in the world, but hey, he does (or did) deserve it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:28, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Finally got around to reading some of his stuff... it was damn good. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 02:10, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Tie breakers becomming the new trend? Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:13, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
• As much as I like Sog's work, I'll be taking UU's approach here. Plus, Asahatter is a good writer. ~ 17:46, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
• Indoodlees Per the last month or two. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:47, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He's as mad as a hatter I say. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 20:07 Feb 28 2010

Uncyclopedian of the Month

The Woodburninator (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: + Lots of 17s

• Nom+For. Woody is going to win this award. End of story! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:50, 1 February 2010
• For Per the fact that it was so close last month that some idiot admin actually thought he had won. MrN  Fork you! 00:55, Feb 1
• YeAh!!!1 --Nigger Fucking Faggot Etc x1000 and Shithead N/O/T/FUCKING FUNNYR.D.B. COW! GOTM THING INCEST EATMYSHORTS GAYMUSIC HAWKMAN MF LESCLAY DON'TVOTE 01:06, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He was only one point away last time, so yeah. --HELPME 01:07, February 1, 2010 (UTC)—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM Sorry dude, but I'm going for Puppy this time. You'll win anyway.
• For Yep. Aleister in Chains 1:17 1 Feb. MMX
• About time, too! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 22:44, Feb 1 2010
• For. Per, like, those six other times I voted for him in previous months. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:51, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
• WOODY>JESUS ~ 13:54, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

  Yes, but how big of a compliment is this coming from you, 'Dillo? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:29, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

  Not much of a compliment I'm afraid. ~ 09:08, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

• For. Woody rules. Or something. --UU - natter 14:00, Feb 2
• Rules>Kittens? -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:41, 2 Feb
• For Despite my vanity, I have to admit that January was somewhat of a quiet month for me and I have not been anywhere near as proactive a user as Woody. Maybe I'll pick up a little in Feb, but Woody far outweighs me on this one at present. Pup
• Diggity-Diggity-Duh! sausage lol 22:12, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
• STRONGEST POSSIBLE AGAINST. Woody is a goddamn terrorist. Nah, just kidding. For. pillow talk 23:27, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
• This guy. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:46, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
• Absolutely. Guy got robbed last month. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 06:14, February 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. As per last month.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 08:35, 5 February 2010
• For. Sorry for voting for Why? last month, but I just had to. ~ 13:47, Feb 5, 2010
• For. He isn't here as much as some, but he is still here a fair amount and does good stuff at those times. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:51, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Comment.Seriously, does MadMax not work or sleep? It's like he has edited every single article on this site. ~ 14:18, Feb 5, 2010

• For. Pippo 22:09, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6 gods that are in the radio

• Nom+For. The guy does code, the guy does criticism, the guy does courtesy. What more could a fan of alliteration want? --Matfen 17:45, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

  Cocks. -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:43, 2 Feb

  Hehe! And creampies. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 19:08 • Tuesday, 2-02-2010

• For. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 19:08 • Tuesday, 2-02-2010
• For --Sog1970 19:09, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For my brother. Or is he my husband? I get those two mixed up. :P DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 02:48, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
• Five. One of my favorites, if my very favorite. Very helpful to me, and funny. Great writer, too. Which is why I also said yes to him for UGOTM. The logic is irrefutable.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 00:22, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment. Puppy's a great Uncyclopedian and deserves this. But Woody's been here longer than Puppy and I put together, and from checking Woody's contributions, has deserved it longer too. (Besides, this is the only real award I got that Puppy hasn't, and I want to be able to gloat a little longer). WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 06:20, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not gloating now because my UotM Award for last month is now missing. I will give a reward to whoever finds it and returns it to me. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 21:46, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

ChiefjusticeDS stopped the person who had it, and returned it to me. Go, Chiefster! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:53, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

• So fast he gave me coding help before the Scottish one could. --nldr 18:36, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• NF Systematically and deliberately raises the content:crap ratio of Uncyclopedia, not only by purging the bad stuff on VFD but by rewriting the bad stuff on VFD. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:29, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
• I Like Ike. --Nigger Fucking Faggot Etc x1000 and Shithead N/O/T/FUCKING FUNNYR.D.B. COW! GOTM THING INCEST EATMYSHORTS GAYMUSIC HAWKMAN MF LESCLAY DON'TVOTE 00:44, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
• For. A supporter for his work on VFD and our recent collaborations on retrieved articles. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:25, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

  Spiritual for - An exceedingly good uncyclopedian, and well deserves this award. Pup 00:00, 10/02/2010

  Additional pie, although I voted for the other guy. Anyone who wants to know what to do at VFD... Look at SPIKE. This man actually puts his money where his votes are. Him and Romartus are both VERY welcome at VFD. I find it very hard to criticise a user who fights to keep articles by fixing them. It's going to be a close tough battle next month... MrN  Fork you! 23:33, Feb 26

Kip the Dip (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• Nom Though I have already voted I wanted to nom Kip also. In my first few months at Uncyc Kip always used to make me laugh with his skillful dickery and general naughtiness which was unfortunately interrupted by a long term sabbatical. Now Kip has come back, and he continues to make me laugh. Some people also might not realise just how much helping out around the place Kip has done over the years. Actually Kip is probably too cool for Uncyclopedia. I know that because he will actually be slightly insulted by this nomination. Which is why I'm making it. Obviously. MrN  Fork you! 00:01, Feb 7
• Has Kip really never won this before?....Obvious For. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 01:46, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and Chiefor - This guy makes an awesom job at pee review. I know there is a separate award but he should get this one too. At least pee review is a part of Uncy, isn't it. And morevoer, this guy doesn't want to be an admin. I think he should be an admin because he already behaves like admin ;D Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:57, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

  Completely agree. That's why we voted him as UotM a few months ago! Pup 23:45, 9/02/2010

Noob of the Month

Extreme aggression (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0 metal bands

• Nom & Temporary Bless He wrote Kreator, and not many noobs are working recently, and he has a totally badass name. Staying here until someone better appears. Jenny? 18:36,6February,2010

Apparently he only edited it. Nice name still. Jenny? 23:51,14February,2010

Sakai4eva (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3 eaten by bears

• Nom A promising noob who wrote Asian Black Bear and has done a number of edits in other areas. (I'm waiting to vote until I check out more noobs). WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 17:57, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Apparantly has done much more than Asian Bear. Many UnNews stories, has pee reviewed, forum participation, uploaded quite a few pictures, other edits. This noob has the eye of the tiger (bought at a pawnshop, but the EotT nonetheless). Aleister in Chains 23:54 6 Feb. MMX
• For. I like this user; he/she shows potential. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 00:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
• For. This user can take a joke. (I'm not sure where they take it.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  07 Feb 2010 ~ 00:43 (UTC)
• For., but Chen Kenichi is better.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 01:40, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment:Ah, I must say it's an honor to be nominated... But my modesty gene hasn't been eroded by my ego enough to vote for myself yet. It matters not if I think I am funny, I'm here to entertain and to be entertained. Thanks, though. --Sakai4eva 03:41, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2 perennial nubs

• Nom I think he has potential. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:57, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
• hell yeah --Nigger Fucking Faggot Etc x1000 and Shithead N/O/T/FUCKING FUNNYR.D.B. COW! GOTM THING INCEST EATMYSHORTS GAYMUSIC HAWKMAN MF LESCLAY DON'TVOTE 02:10, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. User name has too many words. Why do I need to provide this? 02:50, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Does good work for a noob. -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:15, 6 Feb
• Comment. We must have some real noobs who deserve this! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 02:43, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment. What's wrong with User:Sakai4eva? I don't normally watch noobs, but he's been all over the place. I'm also not one of those guys who nominate noobs so if they're not nominating, I just assume that there's something wrong with him. So...should I nom? ~ 17:06, Feb 6, 2010

I've been seeing his stuff also, on UnNews and other areas. Ask Why?, but I'd say go ahead and nom him. The nipple ring is an honored tradition. I won it once or twice, but that was so last decade. Aleister in Chains 17:15 6 Feb. MMX

HH you certainly could have nommed, but I beat you to it. (Actually, the user was on my Noob Watch). :-P WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 17:58, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

• Against, he's just too new for this award. Yes, that's possible. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 00:15, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
• Duh. sausage lol 20:38, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
• Rcmurphy is a noob Don't know why but I'll follow the crowd. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:50, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Fantabanana (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0 bananas with prefixes

• Template:Nom Checked out a bit of his stuff. Looks like he's well on his way. Jenny? 20:39,6February,2010

By "well on his way" you mean "banned for one month," right? —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 05:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that too. But what can I say, I'm a fan of his work. Jenny? 16:27,7February,2010

Even though this editor was disruptive, I didn't find the edits to be just random crap like we often see, but thought the edits showed some thought and creativity. With a little more self-control (and some time reading HTBFANJS), I suspect this could be a productive user. I suspect that's part of the reason the block wasn't indefinite. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:06, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

HELPME (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 11 OHNOITSGOTME

• Nom & For. Is eligible, and seems to know what he's doing, which sets him apart from about half of the currently nominated candidates. (Those would be RC and that banned nub) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 13:31, Feb 8 2010
• For. Someone help him up already! ~ 13:34, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

*For, because I'm a dirty, dirty self promoter. Rawr. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 22:34, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

You make it sound like being a self-promoting whore is a bad thing.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 06:36, 25/02/2010

• Spiritual for. Dammit, I like this guy (HELPME) too... but I don't wanna rescind my other vote... For. as per the other guy hasn't been here for ten days. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 15:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • comment This is a good place to hide, like being under the bleachers or something. I'm gonna eat the popcorn from the ground, and look for stuff people have left here. Aleister in Chains 15:39 8 Feb. MMX
  • Hey! Get out of here! This is out spot! Jenny? 20:57,8February,2010
    • Maybe this is where the trolls sleep. Aleister in Chains 22:22 8 Feb. MMX

Is the cabal under here?!?!?!?!one!!1—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 21:30, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

What happened? These few comments, starting with Pelargonium's, used to be under the Awards page logo. Now they're out in the open and the sunlight hurts, ow. Oh, and a Spiritual Vote for HELPME, maybe there can be a tie. Aleister in Chains 1:14 12 Feb. MMX

It was probably moved because I wasn't the last nomination on the page anymore.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 01:51, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

For. Carry on. --InvincibleFlameGrueMaster 02 12, 01:21, 2010

• Comment. HELPME is working hard to contribute here and is very open to suggestions from experienced editors, which is great--wish more Noobs were like that. But for the benefit of us anally-retentive types who sometimes get lost around here, could someone please post a link to where he's 'written at least one "full" article' or has 'created at least 5 "decent" photoshopped images'? I must have missed that, and I'm trying to be a good adopter here. Thanks! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:27, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

I just looked up there again to see-and crap- I didn't see that before. Damn.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 08:39, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

His article here qualifies him not only for this award but for his reward in heaven, so Why?, do the ressearch (and please find the extra "s" in this comment because I'm too allfuck stupid to even proofread the first 7 words of my feature article)Al 10:32 13 2 MMX

This was a joke entry, on the 13th of Feb. It's now the 25th, and is not funny anymore. Aleister in Chains 2:36 25 2 2MX

• Yes I can't turn around with accidentally knocking into him. He must be doing something! --Matfen 13:41, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
• Bless. He voted for Jenny. Jenny? 23:52,14February,2010
• For. How could I NOT vote this way? well, I could have excluded the check mark... --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 00:51 EST 19 Feb, 2010
• Comment I would vote for, but someone has decided that his homework is more important. If I supported that stance what kind of father would I be?                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 03:46, 25/02/2010
• For. I'm going to vote for HELPME even though I'm nommed below because HELPME is a bloke. See his retraction and vote for me in my nomination section. Damn fine fellow. Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates 03:54, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Something something. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 04:59 • Thursday, 25-02-2010
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:30, 27 February 2010
• For. It was close for me between Sakai4eva and HELPME; both are very promising users and I'm glad they're both here. But in the end, I had to do the honorable thing and vote based on nepotism. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:29, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

• Comment. Ruling by Mordillo is that this qualifies HELPME's nomination. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:15, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
• Last-Minute For. A generally useful dude, from what I've seen of him. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:05, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3 maneaters

Spiritual For +2

• Nom Wow. If she/he isn't a sock then he/she/it came in like gangbangers gangbusters with The Black Hole (Disney Movie) (although it needs links). I like the other guys/girls/shemen nominated, yet Joyce, imnho, may dominate the voting in March if they/she/it/he sticks around. Aleister in Chains 14:54 11 Feb. MMX
• Spiritual For. Excellent work so far, will vote for next month as I believe he'll (she'll?) be still eligible. ~ 15:31, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment: She'll be eligible next month, I won't be, so vote for me! /shameless vote whoring :P —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 21:32, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment: I'm thrilled to be nommed. Don't know if I'll vote for me, yet, or the sentimental favorite which appears to be HELPME. Would it look too like a suck-up if I was Spritual For me and For HELPME? I mean, I am a suck-up, just not an amoral one. I would also like to point out that I've completed a second article, The Foundation Trilogy (Bob Vila Series), which I would like to submit as evidence of potential awesomeness on my part.--Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates 14:54, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Because I'm waaaaay too nice to vote for myself, I realized. (Removing my other vote now)—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 22:19, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
• I'm a sheep                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 04:21, 25/02/2010
• BIG Spiritual For. I've already voted, and don't like to change my votes. But the user I voted for seems to have gone away, and the other guy hasn't written an article as yet (3 days left, on my pocket calculator) although he does contribute on lots of other things, and Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates is plugging along with quality writing and is starting to wander the site. So, For, in the spirit world, where it really counts. Aleister in Chains 11:05 25 2 2MX
• Yes. Blah blah blah, contributions, whatever. All I know is that Hall & Oates rule. --nldr 19:21, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • As does the authoress. --nldr 19:25, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

March

NOTM

CluelessPedestrian (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3 People run over by cars

• Nom and maybe I'll vote later. I'm nominating this lad/ladette (we need a term to get around gender mysteries on NotM) because of what I've seen of The company of myself. It's not even finished yet, from what I can tell, but the shape and the dimensions of the page just feels promising to me. Maybe by the end of this month, CluelessPedestrian will have done more writing and contributions and saved lives and whatever. The page s/he is writing at the moment is rather unusual maybe, but I find most articles are these days. --nldr 03:47, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
  • Maybe Was the above comment on The company of myself based upon the March 1st edition? From what I can tell, some heavy modification has happened. Rifting Contribs ... dont fall in....Complain 349 - LOB 03:15, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
    • A version is a version no more in the test of time. What I remember alone is motivation enough to nominate this bloke. --nldr 11:40, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

* For.I've reviewed two of his pages so far, I think he has the potential to be a very funny writer here. The beginning is always the trial and error period and he's making good progress.--Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 16:44 EST 5 Mar, 2010

• For.I don't deserve a nomination, but who cares! I'm a narcissistic hypocrite who votes for himself!--CluelessPedestrian 23:03, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
• I'll go with for. --nldr 02:01, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Although CluelessPedestrian will probably blank this entire page and redo it later. --nldr 02:01, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Because I welcomed him. I take all responsibility for pointing this guy to the right links! —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 06:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6 fans of Bob's Hole

• Nom. The Black Hole (Disney Movie) and The Foundation Trilogy (Bob Vila Series) and probably other cool stuff I haven't seen yet. (I'm waiting to vote until I check out more noobs). WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:08, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Brilliant noob. ~ 21:08, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 21:10, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Way For Have been following JCHO's stuff since last month, and the newest is a creative humorous chopped map of Japan which adds 'value' to an older feature article. Nice work. ~   11:22 2 3 mmx
• For. I refrained from voting for myself last month to express solidarity with the mass approval of HELPME. I am now using my vote on myself as is my right. Oh, God, what have I done? Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates 03:40, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
• Aye. Does good stuffs. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 17:02, Mar 13 2010
• For -RAHB 09:45, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
• For having a tie. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 00:09, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -11

• Nom and against. On the other hand, this guy is just wrecking the place in a baptism of fire. --nldr 03:52, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. Let's set an Uncyclopedia record this month for most votes against a nominee. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:09, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• The right choice or whatever. -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 06:19, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

You're supposed to vote against. Didn't you see my note? Some sysops just won't do what I tell them. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 20:01, March 1, 2010 (UTC)f

Maybe He was expecting the reader to provide the context. Bein' all avantey-guardey and stuff. Like Polanski, without the nasty stuff. Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates 20:09, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Oh I don't know, thought being the first BAFTA winner to rape a teenager was pretty innovative stuff. --nldr 20:15, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

You'd think they'd have a Nobel prize for that. Or something. Most likely, something. Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates 23:54, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

To clarify, he pled guity to "engaging in unlawful intercourse with a minor," or "statuatory rape," and both his probation report and pyschiatric evaluation said that he should not serve jail time. Then when the judge talked about giving him time anyway, he left and went home to his native country of France, etc. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 01:03, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

So everybody wins! Except for the traumatised 14-year old and also the planet that's scarred by Polanski jetting from North America to Europe. Everybody loses! --nldr 03:00, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

• Technical against I've had a look as this user's history and I haven't seen a completed article by him yet. And I'm sure this is just 4.252.99.182 under a different name.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 01:19, 2/03/2010
• Against. Hs sooper men 2 Spng, syin' FU al da tme. Por Spng. Ths gy s alsew uslss. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 02:55, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Absolutely Against As I understand the notes here, RC raped a teenager backstage at the BAFTA, so I don't care how much he deserves this award, I've got to say no. ~   3:03 2 3 mmx
• Against. Nevah! —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 03:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
• Againgst: This user shoops the warble at all your wrong base frequncies be long to U.S. Marble poldeckian cruft to the port-side gangland max!  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Mar 2010 ~ 00:43 (UTC)
• Against. The mere existence of this user caused us to have a family fight about Roman Polanski. I will require therapy. Mommy, daddy, please stop fighting and we'll watch Chinatown again! Joyce Carol Hall-and-Oates 03:55, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. Per Jeremy Renner not winning the Academy Award for Best Actor. --Matfen 11:24, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. per above. --Mn-z 21:41, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. Because I can. --2K12_DAN.VRS 06:28, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
• Against.. Too noobish. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 22:41, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
• For ever and ever. Also, I'm not sure if you're aware of this but you're not the boss of me. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:50, 19 Mar

Because you got fired, that's why.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  21 Mar 2010 ~ 07:56 (UTC)

• For. I don't like following the crowd... Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:15, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Is that why you're still in Poland? OH SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --nldr 22:20, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. Because the rules say you can't vote twice, and it's April Fools Day so screw the rules! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 00:12, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. And screw them again an hour later! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 01:12, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Tragicbooty (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

1. Nom and For: I think this person has done well enough for a nom. Good rewrite on Faith and hopefully more to come.--    00:08, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

   Would-have been for Faith is on VFH, a huge achievment for such a new user. I voted for someone else though.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 21:33, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

   Would-have-also been for Selflessly, I have voted for another. I am now going to add this message on every other candidates nomination page - CBA to praise them directly!! --nldr 01:06, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

2. For. ~ 08:20, Mar 16, 2010
3. Wretched, despicable vote change but Tragicbooty, with his awesome username and awesome article, totally deserves it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 11:02, Mar 16 2010
4. For. Faith was a fine first effort--here's hoping he sticks around. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 00:44, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
5. For. For taking the George Michael on faith. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:32, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
6. For. Per Necropaxx, especially considering the tie vote that probably won't be broken. Don't take this bad Clueless Pedestrian, but I voted for you initially because I saw the promise in you based on my reviews of your articles. I reviewed Faith for Tragicbooty, and that was excellent. I had no idea he was a noob, so in light of the tie, i have to switch in favor of TB --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 25 Mar, 2010

CheddarBBQ (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -1

#Nom and Against On the Potatochopper nom page Cheddar points out that if he's nominated for NoTM he would be in a position to lose all four major awards in the same month. Who am I to stand in the way of history? Aleister in Chains 3:04 11 3 mmx YES!!!! Jenny? 03:50,11March,2010

Invalid. User is not Rcmurphy. MrN  Fork you! 09:12, Mar 11

You have no proof of that.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 21:35, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Invalid Nom and Against. Because I just went without Internet access for over 24 hours and I'm feeling pretty goofy. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 03:29, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

UOTM

Guildensternenstein (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3 people who felt left out because their score didn't have a funny text to go along with it

• Nom and For I can't believe he hasn't got this yet. Guildy is a great supporter of n00bs and seasoned editors alike, has done brilliant work with his creation of Der Unwehr and subsequent supporting, etc. Absolutely and without a slightest hesitation, yes, yes, and HELL YES! Pup 03:37, 1/03/2010

100K of unnecessary chatter moved to talk page by your favorite fascist ~ 11:46, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

• For. per above. --Mn-z 03:01, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. With the end of the month looming and no new nominations in sight, I must throw my support in with the UNFÜHRER --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 25 Mar, 2010

CheddarBBQ (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 Fat Italians

• NomFor. He's been around for over a year and he's never been nominated. He deserves it.. Plus, he's the only Italian we've got. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 03:39 • Monday, 1-03-2010
• Comment. Actually, I have been nommed once, like 11 months ago, by Guildy. Sorry to disappoint you. Jenny? 20:25,1March,2010
• Another Comment I'm not the only Italian, I'm just the best. By far. Jenny? 22:00,1March,2010
• Oi vey, what's with all the comments already?! I've been here almost 3 years and have never been nommed for this. :'( The Man In Black. 23:38, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 15 who like it doggy style

A young John Barnes. The resemblance is uncanny.

An older Jimmy Barnes.

• Nom and For. Helps noobs, helps people with code, gives experienced users suggestions, is doing The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost, fixes unhelpful edits, and helps with other cleanup around the site. Also he's an unabashed vote whore who still manages to act like a good doggy. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:36, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

I reworded my nomination as per this helpful reminder by Mordillo of what UotM is truly for. I really needed to be reminded, and I imagine I'm not the only one. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 20:42, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

• For. If I deserve this award, than Puppy does even more so. He cites my Unwehr contributions, but he has far more Unwehr Points than I. He also does Pees, does coding, and pretty much singlehandedly revived the Unsignpost. He's also the epitome of nice and polite, which is a lot more than can be said about a lot of people here. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:52, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

  "Single-handedly revived the UnSignpost"? I'm very grateful to him for keeping it going for the last two issues while I've been busy, but...? /me feels slightly unappreciated. --UU - natter 12:10, Mar 2

  Awww, I didn't quite mean it that way, UU, I very much appreciate you. In the sack, that is. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:58, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

  There's another way? --UU - natter 18:12, Mar 2

  Well, there's the ass... —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:45, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

• For. -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 06:17, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Forza POTR. --nldr 14:30, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For Reminds me of a young John Barnes. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:51, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

• Don't you mean Jimmy Barnes?                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 22:24, 1/03/2010

• Duh. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 23:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
• For. Puppy is the epitome of an Uncyclopedian - active across the wiki, helping out with reviews, coding stuff, helping other people with their stuff, dong stuff of his own, and remembering to have fun along the way. And all this despite being callously rejected for adoption by some cold-hearted English bastard. Puppy is a hot dog. (You may all groan now). --UU - natter 12:10, Mar 2

That implies there are any warm-hearted Englishmen. The Man In Black. 21:13, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

• For They all deserve it, and Guild should have this award sewn onto his shirt, and then there's puppy, loyal to his friends and a dynamo on the site. He was one of the first to really welcome me here, and then put up my choice of a talk page corner photo (Buffity) because he realized I'm a moron at code. Things change in a few days, and the bandwagon has picked up its driver and hoisted him onto their shoulders. A good choice. ~   2:22 3 3 2mx
• For. Consistently active, never loses his charm, and writes too! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} {{SUBST:CURRENTDAYNAME}}, {{SUBST:CURRENTTIME}}, {{SUBST:CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{SUBST:CURRENTDAY}} {{SUBST:CURRENTYEAR}} UTC
• COMPLETE FOR. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 01:13, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
• Yeah I guess. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:19, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For Loved his/her articles--MsuCarencro 02:43, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
• "' For.' Because I cant remember not to click on the new messages alert when I go on his talkpage User:Rifting 13:05, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
• Really hates me, really loves Uncyclopedia. And this ain't TKF of the Month for damn sure. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:02, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

• I don't hate you - you just really annoy me at times. User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sigheil Wednesday, 03:26, Mar 24 2010 UTC

• For --~ 12:44, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
• For --Sog1970 22:54, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Vote for SPIKE, or he will hit you with this big blue thing.

Score: 8 who pay attention to VFD

• Nom and for. Works consistently hard on VFD and fights to save articles and rewrites them. This is vitally important work that helps keep the site running. The sort of work SPIKE is doing requires a constant commitment and for me his willingness to provide that is worth a nomination and my vote at the very least. --ChiefjusticePSX 09:32, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Though VFD tends to be a bone yard of bad ideas/articles/jokes, Spike still sifts through them to see what can be salvaged. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:46, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment. Thank you for the thought--which coincides with the Great Ice/Wind Storm of 2010, which has left me without power and off VFD for four days and counting. Hope to see you soon! Spıke Ѧ  14:21 1-Mar-10
• For. Some users build skycrapers, but Spike silently trudges through the sewers looking for recyclables, a thankless task which I think deserves recognition. ~ 08:21, Mar 2, 2010
• For. He reminds me of the Asian who keeps rummaging through my garbage. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 21:20 Mar 2 2010
• For. Everyone here certainly deserves a nomination. Having to pick only one, I'm going with Spike, even though I hate sports. He's had lots of great writing contributions, UnNews audios, VFD work. He communicates well, makes a poor lackey, and never pisses me off. His UnNews work answered my coded messages in the form of bat fuck insane articles, begging for someone to write timely, sort of true, and funny stories, as the founding Cabal envisioned. Cheers! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 10:49, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Per Zim. SPIKE is awesome. MrN  Fork you! 11:26, Mar 3
• For. - I took time away from digging in emc's garbage to vote for him. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 20:44, Mar. 3, 2010
• For -RAHB 23:09, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Another comment. At mid-month, I appear to be walking away with the UnNews Foolitzer Prize, as the only reasonable competitor has not only voted for me but sworn off flooding the joint with his namesake three-a-days. That award would also confer Knighthood. Doing so twice in one month to someone who doesn't vote for honors at all is ridiculous, and I will of course still be haunting VFD in April. So I hope freeing my delegates to vote their consciences will fill the rest of March with controversy and drama. Spıke Ѧ 17:50 14-Mar-10

Zana Dark (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom. Per the "how has she not won this yet?" clause. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:49, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Per the "obviously deserving" clause. The Man In Black. 08:42, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Colin "All your base" Heaney (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 "All your chocolate rain"

• Nom. Per the "He begged for it" clause.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Sunday, 21:27, Mar 14 2010 UTC
• For. He might not do very much, and when he does do something it's generally fairly annoying (the goatse incident, for example), but he's been around for years and never ceases to be entertaining. Every community needs a clown, and Colin's a funny one. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:10, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
• For. My nig. FU e|m|c. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:46, 19 Mar
• For. Yay for Colin. Too bad I was late to nominate him for VFS. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 13:09, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

WOTM

Funnybony (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0 2012 Disasters stopped by Jack Bauer

• Nom Funnybony is one of the hardest working and best writers around here, and has been for quite awhile. Lots of good people to vote for this month, and I'll add in one of the best. He's also nominated for Foolitzer and for Photochop, a nomination hat trick. Just some of his dozens of pages: Laird Hamilton, Local, Lord Christopher Monckton, Psychedelic music, William Westmoreland, Soma, Lunar Launch Saga. . .and on, and on. ~   21:23 2 3 2Mx . . .and on and

Skinfan13 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0 fans of skin

• Nom He wrote iPad and Earth; he looks to have a promising future as a writer here. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 23:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Jocke Pirat (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 French gentlemen

• Nom. Well, since we're having a WoTM slump, I figured I'll nominate this guy, who has the highest number of featured articles (7.5, if anyone's interested) out of all non-Wotms. ~ 08:11, Mar 1, 2010
• For per above --Mn-z 02:09, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

CheddarBBQ (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0 Fat Italians

• Nom. Before we start continue to hand it out to writers who haven't been around for ages, lets give it to the ones who still walk amongst us (on four limbs,) like this man. He's fat. He's Italian. He's good enough for this award, in my obviously biased opinion. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 08:44 • Monday, 1-03-2010

  Comment: It's not "start handing it out", but "continue to hand out". ~ 09:35, Mar 1, 2010

• Comment. Wow, thanks Mooshy, but 1 thing quick... are you insane? Also, I'm not that fat. Jenny? 00:33,3March,2010

MadMax (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: ∞ users who have done less for Uncyclopedia than Max has

• Nom+4 OK, Max (to my knowledge) has never claimed a feature and has no FA templates making a mess of his user page. Because of that he does not show up on that Hall of Shame which some of you people appear to think is so important. However, let me tell you something... The Hall of Shame has jack all to do with measuring how much of a contribution in quality writing a user has given to Uncyclopedia. Do you ever go to new pages and encourage new writers by editing their articles? No, I doubt it. Do you ever compile lists of images and post them onto talk pages? No, I doubt it. Do you have over 30,000 edits in the mainspace, and almost 45,000 edits all together? No, I doubt it. Have you tidied up tens of thousands of articles knowing full well you will almost certainly get no credit whatsoever if you do? No, I doubt it. Why? Because you think the Hall of Shame page is a measure of how good a writer you are. Well... I'm telling you now that you are wrong. HOS means jack all, and should not be a guide for choosing WotM winners. Now, could we please prove this point by giving the award for Writer of the month this month to a user who IMO has done as much (if not more) for improving the quality of articles at Uncyclopedia as any other ever. MrN  Fork you! 12:22, Mar 3
• For. If we took every sentence that Max has edited, and carefully compiled these sentences into appropriate collections we call paragraphs, and then compile these paragraphs into even larger collections called Articles, he would probably have 10 features by now, anyway. Also, has edited tons of my most obscure pages and shown me a better formatting method without even being asked. --Matfen 13:42, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I don't give a fish about HoS (haven't bothered to add myself on there), and promoting the WotM for actions other than just features, but for things such as reporting in the line of duty under heavy fire or incongruously describing every annal of pain whilst under torture, yeah that's badass. (note: i may be misattributing slightly; MadMax is a solid writer) --nldr 13:52, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Well, obviously I was not talking you Nachlader :P It's those 'other' guys! Yea... Like YOU reading this now! You know who you are... Or something... MrN  Fork you! 14:01, Mar 3

• Fourth If Max is here, then my vote has to go to him. Funnybony, Cheddar and Skinfan are worth their weight in, well, best left unsaid, and they will all have their time, but MadMax writes large everytime he moves his mouse (ifyaknowwhatImean, wink wink nudge nudge) and has done so for years and years and days and nights and. . .he and Cheddar are fun to play with on the forum picwars page too. All the nominees, writers in the first degree. ~   14:12 32Mx
• Fourth Ditto!--Funnybony 20:39, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I'm flattered by the nomination this month, but I certainly have to go with MadMax, if not for all that I've seen him do around here so far, at least for his name referring to the Road Warrior. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 18:20 EST 3 Mar, 2010
• For. Let's make this one a landslide victory. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 23:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
• For.You're obviously talking about me, aren't you, MrN? I've always assumed that MadMax mostly adds links and categories and stuff like that, because I don't check history, and because how could someone constantly make edits that are "content" in the frequency and fervour that MadMax does? Having been shown the error of my ways, I now bow my head in shame and humbly vote For. ~ 14:23, Mar 4, 2010

Well, obviously I was not talking you Hiatus Hernia :P It's those 'other' guys! (The ones who have not yet voted for Max yet.) Yea... Like YOU reading this now! You know who you are... MrN  Fork you! 14:38, Mar 4

• For.. I can go along with this opinion having seen Mad Max make changes, revert vandals etc on articles I have contributed too. Another of the Unsung heroes of Uncylopedia. Perhaps he needs a tune now. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:33, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
• For. If everyone on this wiki was like Max, maybe, just maybe, we wouldn't suck. --UU - natter 14:44, Mar 6
• YES YES YES. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 01:01, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 19:39, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
• Obvious For MadMax is the unbreakable wall holding back the unstoppable force that is the rest of us idiots. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 19:52, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He has edited each and every article of mine at some point, including the donation of a dozen pictures to my Kurdish Military Industries. MadMax = Awesomeness. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 07:11 • Friday, 12-03-2010
• For Awesome writer but an even better helper. Rifting Contribs ... dont fall in....Complain 349 - LOB 02:04, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

For helpers!

• For. The score text says it all. The Man In Black. 06:28, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Rarely are we graced with contributors and writers of MadMax's efforts and caliber. I'm ashamed he hasn't won this award already. His humility (as touched upon by MrN9k) and large phallus (touched upon by those who have been so honored enough to touch it) are something to be remarked upon in their own right, but for now I'll do with having to support his WotM nomination on the sole basis of my deep admiration for his incredibly attractive and well-groomed mustache. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 01:21 Mar 14 2010
• Against. - Simply because I disagree with the nom and the concept that writing articles that becomes features are of no value, and making so many edits to different articles does. We recently had a discussion about how UotM reflects the work people do to support the community and doesn't reflect the quality of their writing, so the number of features someone has isn't important there - and WotM was pointed to as the award where that did matter. As much as I respect Mad Max, I can't support someone who has no FAs as WotM. User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sigheil Tuesday, 06:58, Mar 23 2010 UTC
• Against. - per toading to Puppy On The Radio. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 13:19, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comments moved to talk page'

• For. Mostly because if he wins this then there's hope for me. For serious though, I've gone on more than one "Let's see what Madmax is doing this week" tours just to see what others like me are up to... It's inspiring.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  25 Mar 2010 ~ 02:19 (UTC)
• Comment. I respect both MadMax and MrN9000, who have both been highly productive and have helped me personally. But I have a little problem with the statement "The Hall of Shame has jack all to do with measuring how much of a contribution in quality writing a user has given to Uncyclopedia." WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:52, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
• For. --~ 12:43, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

April

WOTM

Nachlader (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• Nom and For. Nachlader has written so many detailed, funny,and content-full articles that when another one appears it's easy to overlook the fact that "another one has appeared!" Add to that his assistance to other writers and quality edits to other pages, and methinks it's just about time for Nach to drink potato juice from the silver cup. Aleister in Chains 12:53 1 4 MMX
• Bollocks. I was so going to nominate Nach this month. His stuff is consistently good, and I've enjoyed it pretty much since he started here and I reviewed what turned out to be his first feature. For. --UU - natter 15:33, Apr 1
• Yes! Nach has come back strong! Kudos to you sir! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 15:41, Apr 1 2010
• Comment UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English?, Golf War, Vietnamese dong, World Wildlife Fund, UnBooks:A Guide to the American Roadside Attraction (With DrStrange), Battle of the Bulge in my Pants, Firearm attachments —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PuppyOnTheRadio (talk • contribs)

  Darling, how could you forget that lace on a uniform makes a soldier look extremely manly--Nach's newest, Homosexuality in the British military. Toodles, William, the 2nd in line to the throne if that old queen and his mother ever die 00:31 2 4 2MX

  and phrase --nldr 12:49, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

  I just took what was in HoS and cut and paste here - I try to avoid actually thinking about things wherever possible.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Friday, 22:54, Apr 2 2010 UTC

  This is how the first Europeans came upon Australia. --nldr 00:13, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

• For.For Aleister next month, if he doesn't win. ~ 04:30, Apr 3, 2010
• For. I think I'll call him the "other" Mr.N. DAS NUE ALBUM! M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 21:32, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • i don't support ukip candidates --nldr 00:09, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. You can make a case for any of the other candidates, but Nachlader has deserved it the longest. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:40, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Sorry Al, but Nach has written some of my favorite articles, and has deserved this for a while. For Al next month if he doesn't win.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 02:23, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

He's written some of my favorite articles too. Why do you think I nommed him, for monkey's sake. Al sans chains a few minutes later

• Half-For. Nach's been doing a damn good job for a long while now, but... —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:21, April 10, 2010 (UTC) So it seems... —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:29, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
• Had to choose between Nach and Al. Both are equally awesome, but Nach has been here longer, so he has my FOR. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 12:40, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
• For. While I agree that Al rules, this guy has been here way longer and written loads of great features. Plus he has one of my favourite songs on his userpage. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 14:39, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 13 Chained guys who are going to die due to autoerotic asphyxiation

• Nom Al has done some incredible work in March from helping out with Nintendo to writing the one-day nomination wonder Garage sale, one can only assume he will continue to provide us with great material in April. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 11:17 EST 1 April, 2010
• For. Aleister hasn't been here that long but he is now getting into a very creative stride. A definite vote in favour. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:47, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For <insert justification here>                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Thursday, 23:07, Apr 1 2010 UTC
• Comment - Aleister's accomplishments include Mortal Sin, Anne Hathaway, Garage sale, and In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida. He also has other stuff at the bottom of his fucking gigantic userpage.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 23:25, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Update: HowTo:Blow a dog was just featured, another article of his.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 23:45, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, yes. That last makes me look like a dignified member of the community. Al en'blowin'ze'canine 18:21 2 4 mmx

• For. Difficult choice between this one and the one under. --nldr 18:43, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Maybe he'll get a real fucking userpage if he has this nice shiny award to go on it. --Matfen 22:41, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For.--Funnybony  14:48, Apr 13
• For He wrote Dennis Kucinich's wife. He likes Garfunkel and Oates. Now, does he like battling barbarians while riding a winged Appaloosa? If so, he should be UotY. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:46, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Because.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  09 Apr 2010 ~ 03:34 (UTC)
• For. In hopes of a tie. —Pelozurian (talk) 02:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

  You just love screwing things up, don't you?--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 02:28, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

I least I was born right. —Pelozurian (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

• Good job with formatting and word usage in the above comment as well.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 02:35, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

  Oh no, here we go. The "You're gay!" "No, you're gay" train has pulled into the wotm page-station. Gay. Al sans chains 2:38 10 4 mmx

Shaddup HELLpme. —Pelozurian (talk) 02:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

• Half-For. ...Al's furry of goodness the past month or so is hard to ignore. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:21, April 10, 2010 (UTC) ...that I'm a moron. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:02, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

"Furry of Goodness?" Jenny? 17:31,10April,2010

I meant that to say "fury." You're Italian, and can spell in English better than I can. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:02, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Stupido Americano. Jenny? 20:11,10April,2010

Pretty much. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:59, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

• Minty. Jenny? 17:31,10April,2010
• Spiritual For. In lieu of being able to vote one and two-half times. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:16, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
• for--I'mthedaddy 22:33, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
• Supporting you, Aley! C'mon! You're gonna win this award! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 00:00, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
• Hell fucking yeah Why not?--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 21:25, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
• For --Sog1970 15:40, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
• Am I too late? ~ 00:51, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Skinfan13 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom Per last month's nom. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 21:32, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
• Comment - Skinfan has Earth, iPad, and HowTo:Write Good Poetry. Take a look at User:Skinfan13/Articles for all of his stuff. (I would do this for Nachlader, but I have no idea what his features are)—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 23:28, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Spiritual For. Written a lot of good stuff, and will only get better with time. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:16, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Abstain. I'll abstain on the ground that I don't deserve to win or receive a single vote, on the other hand Earth did get top 3 for March... -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 01:57 EST 30 April, 2010

Mahm00shA (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

1. Nom He's written some good shit Jenny? 19:33,2April,2010
2. Spiritual For. Freddm00shA has really come into his own recently. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:16, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
3. Ditto in spirit Good quality and consistency.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Tuesday, 07:02, Apr 13 2010 UTC

Maniac1075 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

1. Nom and Damn!!! I knew nothing about Maniac, and have spent the better part of two hours reading his stuff, and reading his stuff, and looking at history's of pages and comparing those edits before-Maniac and after-Mainiac and, damn. We set up a fraternity to do most requested article, he's done 35 of them and counting and does them several at a time and quick. His talk page is almost empty except for complaints from Why? (we all love those), so he hasn't really been talking and few talk to him, but Damn!!! Diamond in the ruff in a diamond mine of his own digging. He likes wrestling, and has pretty much made Uncy the home of wrestling humour--singlehandidly as far as I can see. Sure, I'd like to win this award, wouldn't we all, and Nach and Fredd and Skin and Matfen and many others deserve it, yet here is someone I've literally never read. And Damn! Will put him up for Potatochop too if he hasn't won that, because it seems every one of his pages has many very good chops created by this guy I've never heard of. See his Hulk Hogan coming off pee and to VFH soon. Maniac, I Salute! thee. Aleister in Chains 21:07 13 4 MMX

UOTM

Chronarion (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

1. For He created the site and hasn't won yet? WTF?!? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:49, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

   Just nom. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:59, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Mahm00shA (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

1. Nomminty Capn's orders. Also he deserves it. Jenny? 19:30,2April,2010

   Sorry Mooshy, but Guildy really does deserve it this month. Jenny? 19:13,13April,2010

2. For I like him and I feel sorry about the fact he's been having a nil so far :P. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 00:05, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Skinfan13 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom. Skinfan is a steel kidney with great reviews, the creator of Upsilon Sigma Sigma, is now cleaning up vandalism and voting on VFD, and is generally a very positive presence on the site. Plus, unlike the guy above, he exists.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 19:46, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I think upsilon sigma sigma is a pretty cool guy, eh dos article collabs and doesn't afraid of anything M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 14:07, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. poor me, no support *sniff* ;_; for my testicles that is -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 01:55 EST 30 April, 2010

Guildensternenstein (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 14

• nom + 4 per last month and "How did he not win this award yet?" --Mn-z 14:31, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Per above. --Paizu • Maj. • JStw • MUN • LOB • Crap • WHORE • (Talk) 18:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
• For. Guildy is long overdue for this award. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 20:17, Apr 3 2010
• For per being robbed last month.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Sunday, 05:04, Apr 4 2010 UTC
• For Certainly!--Funnybony  14:58, Apr 13
• For. Because he rocks my socks. --UU - natter 14:27, Apr 5
• For. And my socks too. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:39, 5 April 2010
• For if I had two votes. He doesn't just rock my socks, he makes them sticky, and eventually crusty. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at{{{1}}} - 05:240462010 05:24, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Well deserved! And put those socks in a decontamination unit, pronto. Aleister in Chains 1:44 9 4 MMX
• For. Guildy with the Shakespearean like moniker and the first contributor to post up a video here to sing a song of complaint about The Killer Froggy's voting preferences...I would say it's about time he got the tattoo.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:33, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
• Bitch. Jenny? 19:13,13April,2010
• For. --Matfen 22:00, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
• Spiritual For Hasn't he won this yet?                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Tuesday, 22:01, Apr 13 2010 UTC

  It's the educational system's fault, if you ask me. --Matfen 22:06, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

  It seems as though you've voted for me twice, Puppy--though I appreciate the extra support, you should probably fix that. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 00:46, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

  I did the honors.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 01:10, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

  I've amended it to a spiritual for. I'd vote for Guildy, but I can't because I've already voted for Guildy. Ummm...                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Thursday, 01:39, Apr 15 2010 UTC

  Like I said, the educational system's fault! This poor user can't even count how many times he's voted. --Matfen 19:17, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

• GUILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLDY!!!!--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 01:10, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Mainly because his template is so big.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Apr 2010 ~ 02:33 (UTC)
• For.. I apologized to Guildy for not voting for him last month, and I don't want to have to apologize for not voting for him this month too. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:11, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Electrified_mocha_chinchilla (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7 Shockingly Furry Chocolate Coffees

• Nom|For Obviously. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at{{{1}}} - 06:460472010 06:46, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I <4 you all. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 07:10 Apr 7 2010
• Good guy despite his apparent undying hatred. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:38, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

I've always <5'd you and you know it. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 08:39 Apr 7 2010

• For A real Useless Gobshite. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:00, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Um, haven't you got the wrong award? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 04:06, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

• Spiritual for His work for the site goes on and on, and he should win this either now or shortly. A great career and user here. Al sans chains 15:33 13 4 mmx
• For. For running Uncyclopedia's new facebook page and helping to organize the upcoming and fashionably late PLS. (Not that he didn't deserve this already.) —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:55, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Per the Facebook thing. And the fact that Guildy is going to win anyway. <3 you both. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 19:10, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
• For. ~ 23:49, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

NOTM

English peasant (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6 proles

• Nom shows great potential with Paul Gascoigne, Dianamania, and I know where you live. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 21:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
• Seems alright to me. --nldr 13:44, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Dianamania is excellent, and his other stuff shows more potential than any noob I can remember. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:58, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For Along with writing ability, has already shown the willingness and aptitude to do the boring important work of site maintenance.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Monday, 08:52, Apr 5 2010 UTC
• Kurwa Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 13:55, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I've spent the better part of the last 90 minutes actually researching this vote, mainly because I like Msu and his writing and hadn't read much of English peasant's work. And then when I look at his work it seems to have sprouted like a grove of bamboo trees. He's very good, prolific, in-depth, and has the potential of being one of our really good writers. I hate choosing when both are so good, but it was because I don't like doing it that I forced myself to spend the time today, and I'm glad to find two people with such great potential. Aleister in Chains 16:14 26 4
• For.: I would never normally be presumptive enough to nominate myself for anything or vote for myself under any circumstances, but since Msu's vote for himself is currently the only difference in this game, I've done it to tie the scores at 6-6. Here are my main contributions from my first month on Uncyclopedia. English peasant 18:07, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
• For. M'su is a disgusting vandal on Uncyclopedia who should be permanently banned forever. I hope my vote will make Msu cry like a bitch so he/she/ will leave Uncyclopedia and let decent users like English Peasant get the praise that they deserve. M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 22:04, April 27, 2010 (UTC) You can only vote once too. --ChiefjusticePSX 18:20, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

MsuCarencro (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6 Dead Chicken Hawks

• Nom. Msu is really the ideal noob, and eligible. He has 3 in-depth pee reviews, a featured article, and another possible VFH nom in his future (Check User talk:Skinfan13 for more about that) Basically, he's on his way to great things.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 23:39, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I don't need to wait in order to decide on this one, This guys stuff is really good, and I'll make no bones about that fact. Keep in mind I usually hold off on voting until at least half-way through the month. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 22:55 Est 1 April, 2010
• For. I can vote for myself right? M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 20:12, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes you can. Nice name. --nldr 21:02, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Like HELPME said, the ideal noob. And that was an awesome story. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 05:00, Apr 5 2010
• For. Per above. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 09:57 • Monday, 5-04-2010
• For. Per Brotherhood, and some writing related stuff. --Matfen 09:51, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Showing great promise. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:34, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Fuck you Msu, this is going to be a draw whether you like it or not (7-7). English peasant 18:16, April 28, 2010 (UTC) Vote stricken, you may only vote once. --ChiefjusticePSX 18:19, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +/-0 spiritual noobs

• Nom. Because it's spring in Jerusalem.  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  03:23, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
• Spititual Forgainst Im feelin a lil queezy --Paizu • Maj. • JStw • MUN • LOB • Crap • WHORE • (Talk) 22:07, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
• Spirtual against. Username has too many capital letters. HELPME
• Spiritual For. Dude's in the peace corps, yo. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 05:01, Apr 5 2010

spiritually about to start removing your votes. ~ 08:21, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Mordillo, you're a party pooper. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 08:26 • Friday, 9-04-2010

That I am. ~ 08:46, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

• Spiritual For. Because this guy keeps popping up in NoTM every single month and let's just give him the damn Spiritual Noob Ninjastar already, damnit. 2K12_DAN.VRS 05:28, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
• For Obviously. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at18:42, Friday 16 April 2010 -

May

WOTM

Fredd The Mahmauscher (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 23 bandvolkswagen drivers

1. Nom and for Kurdish Military Industries and MTV Castles: Elizabeth Bathory managed to take out top spot March and looking like top spot in April. Mooshy has been going from strength to strength. Without a doubt one of the best writers around.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Sunday, 23:29, May 2 2010 UTC
2. For. Awesome writer and a great guy in general. —Pelozurian (talk) 23:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
3. Minty. Per always. Jenny? 00:01,3May,2010

   Thank you guys for your support, I really appreciate it, even if I don't win... Puppy, Paizuri, Chedds, <insert name here>: I'll always love you all! :) SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 07:20, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

4. For. A great guy with great ideas who's really come into his own the last few months. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:05, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
5. Aye. I heard HowTo:Be A King made January's top spot. --Matfen 16:15, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
6. Strong for. Although he's not like Aleister "feature every 30 seconds" in Chains, he consistently writes great and funny articles and doesn't get too pretentious. And, he's from Egypt. So, in conclusion, vote for Fredd and you'll get some hedd.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 19:43, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
7. For.--Funnybony  06:10, May 4

   I wish (both for the 30 seconds and for hedd from Fredd, and they may be related come to think of it)! For the real feature-machine, have you checked out Guildy's numbers? Al des chain 21:05 3 5 MMX

   I've been here four or five months longer than Sog, and he's got half a feature more than me--he's the real feature machine, the prolific bastard. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:10, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

8. For. Writes teh good stuffs... more than me at any rate. --ChiefjusticePSX 18:45, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
9. For.--Funnybony  09:55, May 14
10. For. From what I went back and read, he writes some really good articles.--Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 20:16, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
11. For. Don't worry Fredd, we'll work on the M1 Abrams soon! -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 00:11 EST 6 May, 2010
12. For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 21:33 May 6 2010
13. Bless. Per Facebook. [retired]is me 13:03 May 8
14. For Because he scares me a little--Sog1970 08:17, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
15. For Pantsera 10:29, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
16. dicks lol - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at00:34, Wednesday 12 May 2010 -
17. Bandvagon. ~ 12:11, May 12, 2010
18. Bandvolkswagen. For Our Man in Alexandria Giza. (Egypt that is, not some one horse town in Nebraska or wherever). Also who can't spell Band? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:32, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

    I'm from Giza. :P SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 19:36, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

19. Aye • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 10:02, May 26 2010
20. For Following the subliminal stimuli which Fred left on my talk page :P (but seriously I'd vote for him anyway. Just didn't know he is running for it) Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 21:03, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
21. He bought a camel so we could cyber.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
22. Obvious Egyptian For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:36, 29 May 2010
23. 4 Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 18:42, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Maniac1075 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

1. NF - per last month, the guy has written an ungodly amount of good articles, and the fact that you don't hear anything about him just gives him extra bonus. ~ 05:30, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
2. For. The perfect lone wolf writer. Silent, deadly, prolific, and fast. Have just gone over some of his stuff again (and he has written and edited much more than his wrestling portfolio) to assure that my assessment last month was correct, and yep. And Maniac just co-won potatochopper because he puts amazing chops on almost all his pages. Nach, Fredd, Spike, Skin, Matfen, and Black Flamingo (to mention only six of many) should be given this award by acclamation, but we have this one-a-month thing. So this month I'll go with our hermit hemingway. Aleister in Chains 13:38 3 5 MMX

   Spiritual almost for I'm extremely impressed with Maniac's body of work, but I'd like to see a few of his articles polished up to FA status before saying yes. Having said that, we have a great competition here - Fredd does highest quality work but does it a bit slower, Maniac does a huge amount of work but not of the same quality.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Tuesday, 07:36, May 4 2010 UTC

3. Spiritual for. Next month he has my vote for sure. —Pelozurian (talk) 23:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

1. Wow. I never realised the quantity and quality of this guy's contributions until now. Definitely For. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 14:16, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Nachlader (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

1. Nom and For This guy deserves recognition for Vietnamese dong, Trench warfare and many other great articles I can't find because he was a cock and put an annoying Youtube link on his user page. Right now he's the 3rd party candidate so it will impress your indie music geek friends more than a discussion over the definition of emo. --Nikau 03:18, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
2. Spiritual For For For Nach deserves this soon. Nuff said. Al sans chains 23:53 10 5 MMX

SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

1. Nom Let's get SPIKE's name in the mix here. Fredd looks like a well-deserved winner this month, and the ancient God's of Egypt rejoice. But what of SPIKE, who writes quality pages almost every day (not just a few times a month like the rest of us slackers, except for Maniac) on UnNews. Zim (a former WoTM), SPIKE, and a few others hoist on their broad shoulders the UnNews franchise, which many readers consider the most important part of Uncyclopedia. WoTM is his journalistic birthright. Aleister in Chains 00:02 11 5 MMX

Comment. Let me return the compliment! I was in the running for UotM last month as the premier VFD scavenger, a role that you have eagerly assumed after the muse called me over to UnNews Audio. Colliding with you today on edits to Tefillin has been like old times. Spıke Ѧ 01:20 13-May-10

UOTM

Electrified mocha chinchilla (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 19 Polacks

1. Nomfor. E|M|C is awesome. Vote for change. Vote for him! SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 15:18, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
2. Fucking rodent. ~ 16:41, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
3. For. For running our facebook page, organizing PLS, and doing a bunch of other important stuff over the years. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:35, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
4. For —Pelozurian (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

   Spiritual for as I can't find myself capable of voting for someone who thinks all Australians are smelly.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Sunday, 23:34, May 2 2010 UTC

   Spiritual For I didn't think he was interested because he nommed Ethena. And he does think Australians are smelly. Aleister sans chains 23:44 2 5 MMX

   Comment. The E.M. Chinchilla thinks Australians are smelly? WTF? He's one to talk. Did you know chinchillas don't take baths? Instead, they roll around in dirt. Seriously. Dirty, smelly rodents! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:08, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

5. For! EMC is pretty much the coolest dude ever for adoptin' me and helping me figure out how to fuck everything up do stuff. Love,  
6. Yes As per the old person clause, being here forever, doing useful shit, running PLS... Yea. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:45, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
7. For.. IronLung 05:56, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
8. For. - He knows about my Really Big Tree. He needs a wheelchair as a result.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:38, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
9. For The disgusting bastard. --ChiefjusticePSX 13:40, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
10. dicks lol - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at19:29, Monday 03 May 2010 -
11. Aye. I've seen him running round for ages doing... something. It was a close one for my brother HELPME, though. --Matfen 20:00, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
12. Against He's a cock-shite whatever that may be. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:09, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
13. Cool. -RAHB 07:15, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
14. For. the lightning caffeine rat has my vote -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 00:13 EST 6 May, 2010
15. For. What, you mean EMC hasn't gotten this yet? Life is so unfair. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:21, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
16. For     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   23:51, Saturday 15 May 2010  
17. For. As Chinchillas only have short little lives, I think he will need this pretty soon. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:54, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
18. 4' Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 21:05, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
19. Bah! He's alright. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:10, 26 May 2010
20. I have seen his trousers. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
21. DUH – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 08:35 May 29, 2010
22. For. Been useful and all that. Also a gibbering lunatic, but this has not swayed my decision in the slightest. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 09:34, May 29 2010

Ethine (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2 hydrocarbon chains

1. Nom & for. This user became active this month, despite having been on this site for several years, and since doing so has been tirelessly reverting vandalism, welcoming new users, adding categories to pages, and just being a friendly good help. Ethine is also, with Dr. Skullthumper, the primary creator of UnSkype which any of you with sexy voices should join. I also heard that this user may be a woman. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 11:52 May 2 2010

   He nominated her because she sends him pictures of her hands. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:32, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

   Spiritual for and willing to change my vote for a photo of her hands.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Thursday, 09:49, May 6 2010 UTC

2. For. Sometimes, people are all like "Look at that brick wall! Look at all the bricks in that brick wall!" They never notice the fucking mortar. pillow talk 16:42, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

HELPME (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. Nom and For. HELPME has been everywhere too, helping you, helping me, helping the admins, he just is out there helping. Now we can heed his plea to HELP ME (before I edit again?). A good tireless user. Aleister in Chains 12:00 2 5 MMX

   Comment: Thanks, I'm flattered. Even if I don't think I'll win.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 14:45, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

2. For. Yep.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Sunday, 23:32, May 2 2010 UTC

• Comment. I see you getting it someday, son, even if it's not today. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:22, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Zana Dark (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. Nom. Per the "she deserved this ages ago" clause. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:35, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
2. For.--Funnybony  06:05, May 4
3. Bam!  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  05 May 2010 ~ 01:51 (UTC)

THEDUDEMAN (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2 "happy birthday"s

1. TokeNom and SpirituaFor. Today is his birthday. So there. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 18:32, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
2. For cause I can. sort of not really but who cares. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 18:34, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

NOTM

John Lydon (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +9

• Nommity nom nom and For. Holy crap, what a promising user. —Pelozurian (talk) 04:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
• For. After researching some of his work, including the page he has going into the Poo contest, I too come to the conclusion that here is someone who can write well. We've lost some of our Notm winners lately, and we need more in reserve. Aleister in Chains 23:12 15 5 MMX
• For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 06:53 May 17 2010
• For.--Funnybony  17:42, May 17
• For. --Hopelessly Devoted To You... ¡¡¡Silent civilian!!! 22:29, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
• For. After looking through some of his stuff, I have to say that he's pretty damn good for a noob. Eight thumbs and two fingers up. No wait, reverse that (taht). --Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 01:11, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
• For. What Striker said. Statler and Waldorf would approve. Maybe. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 05:17, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:39, 29 May 2010
• Aye. I was going to vote Rcmurphy, but then I noticed he's won this before once or twice. --Matfen 20:09, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and Strong for. Has written multiple features, and has been very helpful. Plus, I don't think John is ready yet.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) 05:22, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
• Strongest possible forgainst i like cereal —Pelozurian (talk) 23:18, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
• 4 Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 21:07, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. I thought Rcmurphy was one of those cherished, beloved myths like unicorns, pegasi and a free lunch. But I just chatted with him on IRC and learned he's a real person. That was terribly disappointing. Nothing personal; I mean, he sounded pretty cool for a real person, if you're into that kind of thing. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 01:16, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

June

WOTM

Matfen (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 11

1. NomFor. Because the day after tomorrow is his birthday. Also, he has six features, that I'm too lazy to list. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 12:06, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
2. For. While Dex isn't bad, Matfen has really shone as a good writer that works hard. If you need an article about a male celebrity, Matfen's your man.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 07:15, June 01 2010 UTC

   Spiritual for If he loses this month then next for sure. He carried the Frat project in April, is always writing something, and, most of all, finally got Christian Bale featured--a daunting task in itself. Al des chains 20:23 1 6 MMX

3. For I like his features. And he helped me a good bit to get this piece of shit featured. Also, YOU'RE ALL FUCKING IDIOTS FOR VOTING FOR ME!!! Lulz. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 07:33, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
4. For.--Funnybony  17:11, Jun 12
5. For. Because you've got to keep it in the family. --Black Flamingo 00:41, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
6. For--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 17:00, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
7. For. --ChiefjusticePSX 22:30, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
8. Huzzah! -- Sf13 11:14 Budapest, Hungary 27 Jun, 2010
9. For. A good writer. --UU - natter 08:54, Jun 29
10. For. ~ 10:03, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
11. Inconvenient Tie. Because Dex and Matfen (and Nachlader, for that matter) both deserve it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:53, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Dexter111344 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 11 fucking magical voters

1. NomFor. Because the day after tomorrow is coincidentally also his birthday. And he has five features, possibly more seeing as I cannot count properly. --Matfen 18:11, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
2. He's a dick. Jenny? 19:12,1June,2010
3. A wizard did it. Love,  
4. Quantity > Quality --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:46 Jun 1 2010
5. This faggot -- rhyming Ape (write) (Riot Porn) 02:34, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
6. Cocks. -RAHB 07:16, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
7. Idiots. Dexter never manages to whore his articles properly. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:36, 3 June 2010
8. For. —Pelozurian (talk) 20:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
9. Fuckin' Wizard Dex. Should have known that the creator of Wizard would have the benefit of his WotM rival taking the hemlock. And Dex does deserve this award soon, so why not now. Wizard. Aleister, WizardHead 23:38 7 6 MMX
10. How do they work? - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at06:09, Tuesday 29 June 2010 -
11. For. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:29, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Nachlader (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. No, seriously. ~ 20:01, June 1, 2010 (UTC) As Nach doesn't seem to want it this month...~ 10:03, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

   You mean this guy's birthday isn't the third of June?! --Matfen 20:03, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

   That's just stupid. Who isn't born on June 3rd?! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:09, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

   knowing that a jewish person liked me has made me seriously reconsider my role as president of the "save hitler's brain" pressure group. --nldr 21:15, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

2. For Way overdue. Nach, who has 8.5 features and should have several more, and was robbed when he lost out to some douchbag in April, is one of our very best writers. I say carry the cup to his door, dump in on his lawn, and toilet paper his house. Nach! Al des chains 20:17 1 6 MMX

   Nach voted "no" on himself, probably because he's been inactive for two months and is going by the purely literal "Writer of the Month". So I won't argue with him. He does deserves this award, and Uncy deserves him, so come back with a new page or two and we'll try this again. Aleister in Chains 23:25 7 6 MMX

   Crap. Now I don't know who to vote for. =/--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 08:23, June 01 2010 UTC

3. For. I remain a huge fan of his work, and he really should have won this by now. --UU - natter 12:17, Jun 2
4. For. Deserves his place in the Uncyclopedia Sun, page three if he has man boobs big enough. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:54, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
5. For. Somebody nom his Homosexuality in the British military. ~ 02:04, Jun 5, 2010
6. Against. If history is any guide, only talentless planks win this award. Granted, you could rename it Proofreader of the Month, then I would be exempt (also haven't done anything in two months anyway). --nldr 17:24, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

   But let me not detract from the point, fellow wordknights. I would write more, I really would, because I think that the best way to hone my humorist writing skills for my upcoming career would be to write here and show people that this site is still brilliant, but I'm not mentally engineered to force myself on. Otherwise, I would still be trying to not let an idea go unwritten, etc. Thanks for your commendations (even though it's late by well over a year). --nldr 21:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

   Well, many of us weren't here a year ago, and we recognize your talent and appreciate your pages now. As do the old-timey users. And for the ones who don't, you know where to aim your flow. That said, this month may have been a bad time, the magick of the wizard is too strong so soon after its power has increased by being featured. And the wizard will always honor its creator first, with riches and treasure, as befits the enchantment (you do realize the damn/blessed thing is going to be Article of the Year, don't you?). And better late than never, just look at Cary Grant! Aleister 23:56 8 6 MMX

205.56.145.34

Score: 1

1. Because all the other noms suck balls.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Wednesday, 21:18, Jun 30 2010 UTC
2. Spiritual For. Possible Next Month, although I admit that prediction has been made quite arbitrarily. --Matfen 21:23, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

UOTM

Ethine (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +15

• Nom Have you been looking at Recent changes recently? Then you understand this nom. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:56, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Hot – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 07:41 Jun 01, 2010

  Just... Ugh... MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:23, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

• Normally, I'd mention something about potato salad hats. But I think this month deserves a new side dish. Coleslaw hats for everybody!!! Oh and yeah, Ethine, she's cool and stuff. -RAHB 10:16, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Tits or it didn't happen, or some shit like that. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at16:23, Tuesday 01 June 2010 -
• For. Makes sure every n00b feels at home, AND she's so dang positive and upbeat well, gosh.It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 19:48, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Would have voted here had she sent me the pictures of her naked hands that I asked for. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:37, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

  Just no... Fuck no. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:36, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

• SUDDENLY, RACCOONS --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:48 Jun 1 2010
• Indubitably, my fine fellowess. That goddamned Badger. Parlay? 01:39, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
• FOR A CASUAL ACQUAINTANCE LIKE YOU? ANYTHING --Reverse Genocide Cockatrices 01:42, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Ethine is made of kitties and muffins --Asema ^{(can't we resolve this?)} 01:44, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
• BEST FRIEND <3 --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:45, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
• The cabal has spoken. -- rhyming Ape (write) (Riot Porn) 03:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Too bad I don't have Skype. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:55, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

PS I finally did decide to get Skype. An overall nice person. Most of the time. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:04, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah. She helps out, basically. QVFD, welcoming users, reverting, and being nice. I still think she should take up reviewing, though, but I'm just a pee whore.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Sunday, 05:17, June 06 2010 UTC
• Aye. Per Dr. Skullthumper. HELPME = Next Month. --Matfen 10:04, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
• Conditional for: Only if she is Uncyclopedian of EVERY Month. —Sir SysRq (talk) 06:37, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Simsilikesims (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom I've nominated her several times before. I shouldn't have to explain why. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:56, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Is this user hot? I may reconsider. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 07:46 Jun 01, 2010

  Sims is too old for you. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:14, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

  I, on the other hand, am referred to by Romartus one section down as (sigh) "mature." Everything is relative. Spıke Ѧ 14:51 12-Jun-10

• Totally! I don't really know Sims, but she's always doing stuff on the site, and she looks like she's really nice. Love,  

SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• NomFor VFD, saving articles from VFD, UnNews, rewriting and defending popular/controversial articles, reverting vandalism, and other stuff. Also, somebody please renom him next month and the month after next if he doesn't win. ~ 06:15, Jun 1, 2010
• For. Mature contributor. Ages well like a good red wine or cheese. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:24, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. While both Ethine and HELPME are both good users my feeling is that I would like to see the present level of work over a longer period of time. SPIKE works hard on his stuff and does so with Wikipedian levels of maturity and never seems to stop. Whether you think he is ace, or whether you think he needs to lighten up a little it is undeniable that the guy works hard and thus he gets my vote. One thing though SPIKE, I'm the Chief around these here parts, if Zim wants to try and take that title then he must select a second and step outside for a quick joust to settle the matter. --ChiefjusticePSX 11:59, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

  I gave Zim the title; he didn't ask for it. See UnNews:About (illustration) for the basis. Spıke Ѧ 16:49 4-Jun-10

  Ah, then you are the one to do the jousting, select your second and meet over me at the lists.... a horse might help too. --ChiefjusticePSX 22:47, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

  Will there also be a sword fight? Sure, jousting may garner you greater status and more attention from the sexy princess, but the real men compete in the sword fighting contest. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:54, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

  Should we both fall off our horses, it is traditionally decided in such a manner. --ChiefjusticePSX 08:43, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

  I will both stand as second and third for SPIKE. It is clear this debate can only be settled by spilled blood. If both horses expire after you both fall off of them, the duel should be settled by Orcas fabricated into giant morning stars with lasers. Cheers!

• For. He is the Rush Limbaugh to my Walter Cronkite, a refreshing breeze of competence, the Rowan to my Martin, a swarthy monster editor with 43 extra sets of eyebrows. I umbly submit my choice, and say that it's a difficult decision with these other heavy hitters here. Cheers! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 01:23, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Rush Limbaugh? Competent? :S--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 02:13, June 23 2010 UTC

HELPME (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 13

Let's all have a scoop. —Pelozurian (talk) 08:30, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

• Nom and FOR Despite what I've said about him in the past, HELPME is an ideal Uncyclopedian; helpful, friendly, and flamboyantly gay. What more could you ask for? Overall a great Uncyclopedian and an awesome guy to know. —Pelozurian (talk) 07:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

  What more could you ask for? That he curtail his greeting and voting and foruming and finish the article we took off VFD and stuck in his userspace in frickin' February. Spıke Ѧ 16:54 4-Jun-10

  What's the rush? It's in his userspace, so he have can all the time he needs. —Pelozurian (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

  It's called writer's block, and I really don't see what gives you the right to patrol everything I do. I also have a life, you know- I'm sorry I don't do exactly what you want me to at all times. That's not even what this award's about, FYI.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Friday, 07:50, June 04 2010 UTC

  By the way, I have end-of-the-school-year stress, can you tell? I still stand by what I said, though.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Friday, 10:16, June 04 2010 UTC - This isn't worth fighting over.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Friday, 10:30, June 04 2010 UTC

  Lulz. U so mad. U so mad coz Spike is stylin' on u. :) MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:28, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

• Extremely vain for. Sorry Ethine, but you can't turn me on, with the gay thing and all.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 07:36, June 01 2010 UTC -I am striking this vote because the user has a short temper and should not be trusted. He SUXS lolzorz
• Don't ask Don't tell HELPME has helped everybody, long time users and noobs, everywhere and everyone lately. He won't always help me anymore, because he's helped me so much in the past that he wants to spread his help around. But in fact, he's helping me right now! Al des chains 20:29 1 6 MMX
• For. ~ 06:19, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
• Rollback SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:35, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. --Sog1970 11:26, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
• FOR.--Funnybony  21:00, Jun 3
• For. Even though he can't win... did I learn nothing voting Lib Dem? --Black Flamingo 00:37, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Ay, we won this time around...at least in THE MOST AWESUM COUNTRY EVERZ.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Sunday, 01:37, June 13 2010 UTC
• Mother Fucking For He's good at what he does, plus he makes great hot chocolate--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 00:08, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
• For.the voice in my head liked the review and help  ~  The*  (say shit) (My train wrecks) Π   ~  00:37, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
• For I have my reasons Psychotic Spartan 06:16, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
• Does stuff. Hard choice this month.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• This vote was not bought with sexual favors uhh, yup. -- Sf13 13:04 Budapest, Hungary Jun 29, 2010

• You know, if I removed my vote for Ethine and voted for myself, I would win. But I'm more honorable than that.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 06:59, June 30 2010 UTC

  I vote we all remove our votes and vote for Sims instead! Love,  

NOTM

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -2

• Nom per tradition. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:42, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. Noobs aren't allowed to have traditions. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 21:38, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
• Against. This guy goes around the site like he owns the freaking place. Featuring articles, taking on admin jobs, and other stuff for experienced users only. We should temp ban him to teach him a lesson.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 07:28, June 30 2010 UTC

Unununium (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Wow, this guy is a productive noob. Multiple articles and hasn't been a dick. Unless this guy is a sock, I think I found the noob of the month.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 07:39, June 01 2010 UTC
• Just a nom, I guess.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 07:27, June 30 2010 UTC

NonchalantCaterpillar (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• NomFor NonchalantCaterpillar has a stong entry in the Illustrations category in poo lit, and has two well-illustrated articles to his credit. He uploads extra images, and chops like a mofo. If he stays around (we've lost several NotM's lately) he's probably going to be one of the good choppers here. Aleister in Chains 20:47 1 6 MMX
• For.. If this is all true and I don't doubt Aleister's recommendations, then this noob has my vote.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:49, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Noticed several of his edits. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:53, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
• Sounds Good. --You know what the music means... Our time is up. 15:52, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
• For. A good noob, and a name similar to mine. --Docile hippopotamus 04:47, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
• Word. --Matfen 09:48, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
• Me too... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For Never heard of you, seen you, or know anything about you, yet your name is very attractive. That's all I need. -- Sf13 13:09 Budapest, Hungary 29 Jun, 2010
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:58, 30 June 2010

(* For Yekaterinburg, yaroslavl' rostov yakutsk!--M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 01:42, July 1, 2010 (UTC)!) (Too late for a vote AIC)

Loquacious T (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom He actually wrote a good page on Justin Bieber. Also has a sexy name. —Pelozurian (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

TOAST (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nom He seems to be quite competent around the wiki. Also has a tasty name. —Pelozurian (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

  I do not want any awards. Thank you. TOAST 07:48, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

  I love the articles he's putting out, but I have a feeling he's a sock of someone who recently left the site. May explain why he doesn't want the nom as well. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 07:50, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

  I kinda suspected that too, but we can't really prove it; for now he's just an above-average noob. —Pelozurian (talk) 08:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Well now we all know who he (or they) are, plus he's been infinibanned. I think he has a good chance of winning this. —Pelozurian (talk) 03:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

• For. I like his snarky attitude.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Jun 2010 ~ 17:08 (UTC)
• For. He is awesome. -- rhyming Ape (write) (Riot Porn) 01:46, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Obviously. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at03:18, Friday 25 June 2010 -