Forum:Potatochopping is underrated by The Order of Uncyclopedia

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Potatochopping is underrated by The Order of Uncyclopedia

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6300 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Okay, so once again I am using the Forum to get people to vote about something. "What is it this time Zombiebaron?", you ask sighing. Well, I am of the belief that the Potatochopper of the Month award should raise an Uncyclopedians status to Knight or Dame Grand Cross (GUN) on The Order page. The same goes for the new Noob of the Year and RadicalX of the Year awards. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I concur. If not for image editting, I'd be like all the rest of you other poor schmucks...Mwa ha ha ha!!! R 20:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Voting

Potatochopper of the Month

Score: +1

For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For R 20:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For He's sexy, smoothered in gravy, and one of the greatest unerappreciated Uncyclopedians on this site. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 20:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against, see my comments below. CUN, definitely.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For - Definitely give it something. —Braydie at 21:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Making a great image is just as hard as making a great article, and therefore deserves the same amount of recognition. However, great images are harder to com by, so maybe we could only give this award when there are a certain amount of votes for the person in the lead, 15 maybe. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. Comments below.--<<>> 22:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. (see my comment bellow) - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against —rc (t) 00:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Fro -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Against --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Potatochopper of the Year

Score: -3

For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For R 20:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against What a useless pile of shit. I hate zombie. He ate my dad. I'll never forgive him. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 20:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against see my comments below, under "comments". KUN, perhaps.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For - Definitely give it something. —Braydie at 21:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Not sure about this one yet, should tackle PotM issues before we even get into PotY. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. See comments below.--<<>> 22:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. (see my comment bellow) - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against —rc (t) 00:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Against --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Noob of the Year

Score: +0

For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For R 20:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
comment, how can you be a noob for a whole year?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I dunno...I was about to ask you the same thing....=P R 21:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I've been a noob for quite some time now. I'm not actually sure when I become a not-noob. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 21:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Ask Todd, he made it... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

For - Definitely give it something. —Braydie at 21:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Definitely. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. See comments below.--<<>> 22:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. (see my comment bellow) - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against —rc (t) 00:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Nerp -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry. Actually, it was just a joke. :) Thought User:Alfred would be a shoe-in, wherever he is. And maybe User:Clorox. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Against. CUN, definitely. KUN, perhaps. GUN is pushing it. I asked Hindleyite about it ages ago, as PotM doesn't appear at all on The Order page. It got forgot, I guess.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

However PotM's sister WotM gives GUN and Featured Images are sometimes harder to make then Featured Articles. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I'm harder on PotM than I am on WotM because ten hours on a image flies by, but several times that to research and write a page can be like herding cats. Still, I stand by whatever decision I made, unless there's evidence of which I am unaware.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

With no disrespect to anything on this page, against all of them. WotM is much harder to come by than PotM, if only for the sheer volume of featured articles per month. If I'm not mistaken, nearly all of our potatochoppers have won PotM, while we STILL have a lot of great authors who haven't won WotM yet. I feel like Modus knows what he's about. Also, the NotY thing makes no sense to me, and seems ~~like people rather transparently just trying to get another award~~ pointless.--<<>> 22:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree with brad - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Need I discuss the relative pointlessness of CUN, KUN, GUN, etc? Does anyone actually give a crap about these ranks? R 23:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

yes evidently, or this forum topic wouldn't exist - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Modus and Brad. —rc (t) 00:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Surely you can't believe that writing a featured article is harder than becoming Photoshopper of the YEAR....R 00:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean? Featured article writers are only made CUN. —rc (t) 00:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I suppose my point is that Photoshoppers aren't given any consideration at all when it comes to rank. If featured pictures are easy to come by, then maybe if you get 2 you can be CUN. Something needs to be done, anyway.R 01:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Featured image-makers get the same rank (CUN) as featured article-writers. I'm fine with that. —rc (t) 02:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah yes, but the image making award garners nothing but a template. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I am against everything. But I just don't care enough to make more than one edit to say so. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:10, 10 Feb 2007

You promise? FU SPANG —rc (t) 02:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

/me quickly covers up my lack of urban hipness. Cool! I have their last album. Go Fu-Spang Clan!--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Rather than an all-or-nothing vote, how about this?

PotM should get...

You are not entitled to vote.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.

A pat on the back

Commander (CUN)

Knight or Dame Commander (KUN or DUN)

Knight or Dame Grand Cross (GUN)

There were 0 votes since the poll was created on 04:03, 6 July 2021.

poll-id 016B0E0A7833BDFDF9C4ECF9BBD9ED03

PotY (no giggling!) should get...