Talk:Overclocking

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From Pee Review[edit]

Hi there. I made this article, and actually didn't have an account until I saw this pee review. I appreciate your concern for my article, but who the hell put in all the stupid ayz, and why are there links to non-existent pages? 1337_sauce

O. Yeah. That was me. :P As for non-existant links, there's a lot of those on many pages, because, eventally, if a non-existant page has enough pages linking to it, someone might get off their ass and make a page on it. I'll take out the "extras", if you want. Dark Ermac 13:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

This is not my article. I'm just trying in vain(?) to save it from deletion. Any help is greatly appreciated. --Pentium5dot1 03:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I see some (constructive) anon edits to the article, but no review. Should I leave this pee here a little while longer? Pentium5dot1 04:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Leave it as long as needed. 69.48.16.210 13:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Um, you do know that you're allowed to put in zero as a score component for the Pee Review, right? Pentium5dot1 17:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
I do now-Retrofuture42 18:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
The 1337 is too easy and expected. I'd maybe define overclocking as something more literal, like tricking out the speed of the desktop clock or a variation between internal clock and desktop clock making the computer work harder to keep up. Not much of a suggestion, but the article needs a different direction. (Gir. 01:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC))
Humour: 4 A bit better, still needs more content.
Concept: 7 Plenty of potential for nerdy computer humor here.
Prose and formatting: 2 Lose the 1337.
Images: 4 Quite funny, a couple more would make the article!
Miscellaneous: 3 More content needed!
Final Score: 20 Cleanup the prose and add more content in and a good article could come out of this.
Reviewer: Retrofuture42 16:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Re-Written[edit]

Article Re-Writen--aldreneo 02:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Wow. The article is completely different topic now. Dark Ermac 13:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)