Talk:Uncyclo-tan

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Bloink1 solid.png
This article was nominated for deletion on May 9, 2016.
The result of the discussion was Moved.


2010[edit]

Yo[edit]

Yo homies, wikipedia:Uncyclo-tan is up for deletion The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.66.197.17 (talk • contribs) 07:54 January 5, 2010

Um, I don't see why Uncyclo-tan should have its own article. The subject fails WP:V in that we at Uncyclopedia don't even know what she is. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 08:04, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
The info is hoax...somebody copy word from here and paste there. Ace Attacker 16:07, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
She's a moe anthropomorphism, a humanoid representation of a non-human object, similar to Wikipe-tan. It's fine that she has her own article.--68.48.135.146 20:07, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • I didn't even know that Uncyc was required to obey TOW's Verifiability standards. Tyciol 17:35, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

But[edit]

Don't we already have Sophia? ...Not that I'm against having a Uncyclo-tan. VGD >=3 05:37, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Tan[edit]

"-tan" indicates that she is below the age at which she can experience the feeling of love."

That's the first I've heard of it. From what I'm used to, -tan is very similar to -chan, only more cutesy, something like that. Furthermore, ED has Ae-tan and she looks like she can experience love. Tyciol 17:35, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

This is a humor wiki, we aren't consistent across articles. --Mn-z 20:45, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

An <gallery>in the Image Gallery section? 200.96.90.168 03:58, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

And...[edit]

...a male version of uncyclo-tan? --93.41.3.63 19:47, September 24, 2013 (UTC)