From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 14.5 reasons why Uncyclopedia is better.
|
| Nominated by:
|
—Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:39, 22 April 2011
|
For: 14.5
|
 Nom+For. Because. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:39, 22 April 2011- For. I'm jealous. Why is he getting all the features, and I get a half feature. --
 Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 23:43, 22 April 2011
- For. --Black Flamingo 10:47, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For. We had it coming, and we came. Ed Refugee 13:54, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Its a true victory for uncyclopedia so often unfairly compared to that inferior site so I'm all for it. 137.159.94.172 20:15, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Author TheHumbucker promptly answered an article idea submitted by BoctorRodotnik in the UnNews:Newsroom. It would be good if our main page had an "official" reaction to the demise of ED. Spıke Ѧ 00:47 24-Apr-11
- Definitely For this! By the way, I wrote an article about being an ED refugee.
 |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill  | 07:22, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Why the hell not?
 Respond 19:37, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- This works.
1234 ~  19:47, 24 April 2011
- For. I'd feel better if the two other ED writers who excel here voted yes, but they haven't voted no, so that's a good sign. Nice pic, and caption, which is what I've read.Aleister 21:23 25-4-'11
- Yesh. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz
 16:10, 26 April, 2011 (UTC)
- For. ChiefjusticePSX 21:02, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- For. ~
   22:16, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- For. It will never be as good as Uncyclopedia. That's a simple fact. InMooseWeTrust 22:25, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- For. per above or whatever Mn-z 05:14, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
|
| Comments:
|
- Comment. Its a true victory indeed. Ed Refugee 11:35, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
