Forum:Uncyclopedia Safety Movement

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > BHOP > Uncyclopedia Safety Movement
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6309 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.


We need to insure safety of the public to do that we shall now put surgeon general warnings on random pages

SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING:
Roberto Carlos Braga Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, And May Complicate Pregnancy

People are not safe we need to do this for uncyclopedias benefit. Are you guys with me or not! Btw to put in surgeon warning go { { surgeongeneral } } but all together Mylen 18:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Just for future reference, you can use them fancy pants nowiki-tags next time to make it easier on yourself. It turns off auto-wiki-formatting for everything you put between the two bracket sets. (i dont know the fancy name for em, confoundit) Example: <nowiki> {{surgeongeneral}} </nowiki> --Anyone 20:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
And the template should be redone to not waste bandwith and filesize and such with an image. It's just text and a border. <table>, anyone? --User:Nintendorulez 20:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Table-ified. no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 14:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Against

Score: +3 Against votes
  • Against Huh? This just seems like yet anouther template that is neither funny, good looking, nor topical on all but maybe one article. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral Void of a vote. Complete waste of time; everything sucks, is boring, neither sunny, good cooking, nor tropical on all but maybe one neutron particle. "and that zombie admin dude thought he could rhyme..." --AmericanBastard 08:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • For. But am I for the against, or just for? Who knows? Spang talk 12:17, 6 Jan 2007
  • Against This is just another template that is not funny, ugly, and will most likely be spammed on a whole bunch of articles. --General Insineratehymn 15:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Sigh. We need to do something about template spamming. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Make sure it doesn't get spammed, change it to text since there's no point to it being an image, and change children to
    , and then we'll talk. Also, add something about taunting Happy Fun Ball.

For

Score: +1 For vote

For. Yea lil crappy but seems like good idear Mylen 16:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Insineratehymn

He is deeply against this and i feel is a threat to uncyclopedia Mylen 16:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Please note that the above user place that template of his on my userpage without my permission. --General Insineratehymn 16:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
How is it a threat to Uncyclopedia if someone disapproves of a template? --User:Nintendorulez 19:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I was trying to protect people Mylen 16:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

What you were doing was spamming your template. Do not spam your templates. --General Insineratehymn 16:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Template spamming is bad. --User:Nintendorulez 19:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Join the Revolution

You have to protect uncyclopedia people help it!!

SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING:
Roberto Carlos Braga Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, And May Complicate Pregnancy

Mylen 16:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

How about no? We're not going to assist you in spamming your template. --General Insineratehymn 16:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
You should be very glad that I'm not an admin, or else you'd have a one-week ban for template spamming, and userpage vandalization, and bringing up the idiotic premise that we should have a wiki with no admins. Spamming an idiotic template doesn't "protect" anybody. Quit acting stupid. --User:Nintendorulez 19:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

What I think

If you post your new template idea on the Dump, it should be a Bannable offense. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

My god Mylen 18:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. There are never template topics here. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Another header, hurrah!

What is this, something about templates? I'm not a big fan of templates. Few people are; it's too easy to use them for evil.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

NOW THAT THIS IS IN THE BENSON FORUM

MAY BENSON CRUSH YOUR PUNY TEMPLATE. AS BENSON IS BETTER THAN YOUR TEMPLATE. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 05:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

AND WHAT DO YOU KNOW? BENSON'S BAN IS TO BE LIFTED AT 21:36 ON THIS DAY. HE WILL RETURN WITH A VENGEANCE, AND ONCE AGAIN SHOW EVERYONE THAT HE IS BETTER THAN US ALL! --General Insineratehymn 05:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
TODAY??!?!?!? HOT DIGGITY DOG. I'M GIDDY WITH ANTICIPATION. --User:Nintendorulez 16:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
HIS BAN WASN'T LIFTED! WE WERE LIED TO! CRUSH THE INFIDELS! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
GENERAL BENSON WARNING:
BENSON IS BETTER THAN YOU AND BENSON WILL CAUSE YOU TO BE PUNY MONKEY MEN
This is much better... no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 13:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
BENSON DOES NOT CAUSE PEOPLE TO BE PUNY MONKEY MEN. THEY JUST ARE BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT BENSON. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
GENERAL BENSON WARNING:
BENSON IS BETTER THAN YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE. BENSON WILL RISE ABOVE YOU ALL.

is that better? no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 14:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

BENSON ALREADY HAS RISEN ABOVE US ALL. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 16:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Honestly. There's no pleasing some people. I provide you Bensonites with a lovely Benson warning thingy and all you do is complain that it is factually inaccurate. Well boo sucks to you.
GENERAL BENSON WARNING:
BENSON IS RUBBISH.

CAPSLOCK IS OVER-RATED.

...no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 13:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
YOU ARE LYING, GOOD SIR. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
BENSON IS USELESS WARNING:
BENSON WILL NOT RE-APPEAR

HE WILL DISAPPOINT YOU ALL. YOU WILL CONTINUE TO SEEK HIM, BUT IN VAIN.

BENSON SMELLS OF FISH.

no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 11:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
The Chronicles of BENSON, Ch. X, Sec. III:
With great confusion, all the faithful of BENSON felt slightly bemused at the absence of the Great One. "Is not the Great Shameful Ban ended?" cried they. And yea, many were fearful, for they had begun to regain a sense of self-worth in the absence of the one who reminded them how puny they truly were. The Misspelled Accusative did maketh many tables with which to mock BENSON, for yea, surely he would have been too cowardly to do so if BENSON had been present. Granted, they were rather funny, and a mockery of the puny rantings of Someone Else, and the BENSONites had kind of brought it upon themselves, since The Prophetic Swordsman Who Is Not Completely Lucid kept complaining. But knoweth ye, that is not the point! The point is something else altogether, something far beyond the common points made in our daily lives, something which the Chronicler is too lazy to describe in detail.
In the name of the Holy BENSON, where the fuck is he?

--The Acceptable Thinking cap small.png Cainad Sacred Chao.png (Fnord) 18:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I've said it once, I'll say it again: Put that Chronicles page in the mainspace so it can be VFHd and then voted #1 of 2007. --User:Nintendorulez 20:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
GENERAL WARNING:
THESE TEMPLATES SUCK!

BENSON IS ANGRY!

BENSON DOES NOT APROVE OF YOUR STUPID AND POORLY MADE TEMPLATES! NOW BENSON HAS TURNED THEM AGANST YOU... JUST LIKE IN A BAD SCI-FI MOVIE... LIKE 'It Came From A Lab In The Middle Of Nowhere'. YOU ARE TRULY THE PUNYEST MONKEY OF THEM ALL! BENSON SHALL REMEMBER YOU WHENEVER HE NEEDS A GOOD LAUGH. Benson 02:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


GENERAL WARNING:
I DON'T CARE.
BENSON IS BENSON. THAT IS INSULT ENOUGH.


Dear Mr. Benson. I am glad that I amuse you, many thanks for your kind compliment. Also, I fixed your table. no, yuo Tanks-12px.gif chat 12:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh well:

Nothing to see here:
I'm just jumping on the bandwagon.

Perhaps this could appear on the BHOP section?:

REMEMBER:
Not only the thread dumping ground of the sysops, and also a good pancake house, this is also the hallowed halls of the Church of BENSON. Please make a note of it.

I was going to post a third one but I don't remember what it was so I will just leave it there. --KWild 13:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not claim templates as your own.

Dear Mylen,

I created this template. I did not intend for people to use if for spamming purposes or to be just plain stupid. I created so it could be random and yes, I know there is very little humor in it. However, I only put this template on my user page and one article.

I do not approve of you taking credit for something you did not make. Even if you didn't say it, you could've said something to the people who said you did.

Do not put it on people's pages without permission and never take credit for something you didn't do, ever.

Feel free to place the blame on me, despite only creating the template and not using it for spam.

--NESluver 03:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

NESluver, BENSON DOES NOT HATE YOU. HE THINKS IT'S REALLY CUTE WHEN SOMEONE/SOMETHING WRITES A LETTER INSTEAD OF YELLING AT THE PERSON AND STARTING A FLAMEWAR LIKE A MAN. BENSON THEREFORE INVITES YOU INTO THE LEAUGE OF BENSON. BENSON WANTS MORE OF YOU 'Letter Writing' MONKEYS IN THE LEAUGE TO WRITE LETTERS TO THE EVIL ADMINS FOR BENSON. THE ADMINS SEEM TO DISLIKE FLAMES AND FIRE AND THIS DISTRUBES BENSON. PERHAPS YOUR LETTERS CAN DISTRACT THEM WHILE BENSON PREPARES AN OFFENCIVE OF FIRE AND FESSES.

PS. MYLAN DIDN'T EVEN MAKE IT? WHAT A LOSER...

Benson 05:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, BENSON! Glad you're safe! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

The world is now safe

This template, thread, and entire forum can now be deleted. There is nothing more to see, everyone go back to your homes.

  • 2007-01-17 23:12:00 Dawg blocked "Benson (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (Gobshitery above and beyond any semblance of reason.)

You can put all your comments of love and adoration for this on my talk page. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.01.18.06:21