Forum:Uncyclopedia has too few double standards
Seriously guys. We're way behind Hipocrisypedia on this on. -- controversial Ape (suffocate) (Riot Porn) 22:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia has too little double-penetration.
Seriously guys. We're way behind Doublevaginaldoubleanalpedia on this on. 
pillow talk 22:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia has too not many double negatives
As long as we can still understand each other, we're doing something wrong. ~
22:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't not get it. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 22:56, Jan 26
RAHB has too little genitalia
Not to say that his existing one is too little, oh, no no no, it's that he has only ONE unit of it, and he should have many more to please larger parts of the population. ~ 11:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Cajek has too few bans
Seriously. Someone should do something about that. --UU - natter 
11:04, Jan 28
Uncyclopedia has too few bandwagons
And way too many people trying to head west. —Sir SysRq (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Mostly, they're going north. North, to Alaska. Big Sam left Seattle in the year of '92... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
-- 23:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- I can see Russia. -- The Colonel (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Russia can see YOU!! 212.18.40.178 17:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I can see Russia. -- The Colonel (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia has too few memes
Seriously guys. We're way behind 4chan on this on. -- controversial Ape (suffocate) (Riot Porn) 19:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, let's start one about...Furries. BlueYonder
- CONTACT
- I suggested a few in arguably my worst article ever. pillow talk 22:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- If by "furries" you mean "anus" then yes. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I suggested a few in arguably my worst article ever.
Uncyclopedia has too few jokes about underage rape victims
You know it's true. BlueYonder 
- CONTACT
- Yes, we should do something about it right away. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
We're way behind Encyclopedia Dramatica
Thank God that we're way behind Encyclopedia Dramatica. But the photo of a girl that many people here think is a shemale work well as one step closer to ED? 
|Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill 
| 09:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia continues to be the worst. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is a shemale, and its funny in context. Look at the hairy arms and crouch bulge. She's clothed and over the age of consent. --Mnbvcxz 20:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Speaking of ED...
I'm going to post this pic everytime I see ED mentioned in the forums. It's a nice pic of my Pa'. *sniff*, I miss Pa'. Went out for smokes and never came back, he did. Plus, since headers don't appear to be length-limited, I can just ramble on about whatever comes to mind. Which is nice. The rambling, I mean...
Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Really, just really?
Alright then, the opposite of what I said in Forum:Uncyclopedia has too many double standards applies.
- Goatse images are still not right.
- Porn and gore images should be used in most of our articles despite what we say about them, and be used in userpages, albeit sparingly with porno, do what you want with gore.
There, I said it, I made it true, now reply or live with it.
SPARTAN-A984, Protecting the world from angry lawn gnomes since 1996 17:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)