Template talk:FA

Proposal

This template should also include a link to the archived discussion about the article. The thing is, were such a feature introduced, it would show up red on the majority of featured articles and only gradually change after tedious work. Still, I think it would be worth it in the end. What do people say? —Lenoxus 20:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Please insert inter-Langage-link to Japanese

Please insert following inter-Langage-link to Japanese. Because of i'm not admin, can not edit this template.--Muttley 11:00, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

[[ja:Template:秀逸]]

 Done The documentation is editable by non-admins, even for protected templates. (It didn't exist in 2010). Sorry it took so long though :\ Dark Web, White Hat (talk) 07:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Odd question

The following code:

<span style="display:none">[[Template:FA/{{#time:d F Y|{{{date}}}}}]][[Template:FA/{{#time:Y|{{{date}}}}}]]</span>

This seems to have no effect on the template at all, with the exception of creating a few thousand template links that don't exist. I'm assuming this is purely as a method of using DPL to determine which article featured when, so that the "featured in year" and "featured on this day" templates work. Am I correct?                                • Puppy's talk page • 07:40 06 Apr