From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Humour:
|
5
|
I enjoyed it. Not enough fact to be a real article, not enough fiction to be stupid. I think you could exaggerate certain aspects more, though, make them more like the "legend" section which I liked the best. Otherwise, it's a bit dry.
|
| Concept:
|
6
|
Solid topic, but nothing new or revolutionary.
|
| Prose and formatting:
|
5
|
The writing seemed a bit erratic to me. It opens up like an (intentionally) bad encyclopedia article, but then goes into a "silly" vibe in the history section and then a narrative in the "legend" section. I think it would be better if it were written in a more consistent (yet still silly) style.
|
| Images:
|
7
|
Yup, those sure are images. The "photograph" of the sky was the best, and the others fit well with the article.
|
| Miscellaneous:
|
10
|
n/a
|
| Final Score:
|
33
|
Ecletic, but solid, article. Not bad.
|
| Reviewer:
|
--Mejwell 14:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
|