Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Reproduction

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

FAQ

Reproduction[edit]

Flyingnarwhals (talk) 04:09, February 21, 2019 (UTC) Eyy... its me again, coming back for round two. Only felt like doing two microsoft paint projects today. How is the article?

Added 04:09, February 21, 2019 (UTC)

[[Template:Review request/{{#time: ymd|04:09, February 21, 2019 (UTC)]]

Reviewed[edit]

Humour Concept Prose Images Misc Summary
Reviewer details

A little bit about the reviewer

{{{Reviewer}}}

Humour

How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?

{{{Hscore}}}

{{{Hcomment}}}

Concept

How good is an idea behind the article?

{{{Cscore}}}

{{{Ccomment}}}

Prose and Formatting

How good does it look and how well does it read?

{{{Pscore}}}

{{{Pcomment}}}

Images

How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?

{{{Iscore}}}

{{{Icomment}}}

Miscellaneous

The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.

{{{Mscore}}}

{{{Mcomment}}}

Summary

An overall summation of the article.

{{{Fcomment}}}

--Nigel Scribbler sig2.png (talk) 01:28, March 1, 2019 (UTC)
As it stands, it's good and good to go. However, you have once again chosen a huge subject and barely covered it. Maybe someone will come along and add to it, like for Africa (for White People), but more likely not, if you read other stuff on the site.
This was a Pee Review by --Nigel Scribbler sig2.png (talk) 01:28, March 1, 2019 (UTC)


Author: Are you satisfied by this review?
Click here, if yes
Request a new one, if no!

{{{Yes}}}