Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Don't Be A Cannibal

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archived

Guidelines

FAQ

Pee Week

Committee

RotM

Why?:You should not be a cannibal

It's short, it's ugly, reaaally ugly and it's new. It's been reviewed recently... I did a li'l. --  Le Cejak • <-> 13:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

• How do I improve the formatting?
• What else do motivational speakers talk about?
• How should I make the "it's okay" section longer?

I read it, but I wouldn't want to grade it as of now. The whole concept of deleted lines turned me off a bit. Questions is, is that necessary for the concept of the article? ~ 21:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, no more strikeouts or censorships. --  Le Cejak • <-> 23:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you move it to Why?:Not Be A Cannibal. -- living Ape (eat) (Riot Porn) 22:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I had problems with the name. Why not be a cannibal sounds like an invitation to be a cannibal, kinda. It's like, "why NOT be a cannibal??" --  Le Cejak • <-> 23:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Why?:You should not be a cannibal -- living Ape (eat) (Riot Porn) 23:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, okay that sounds good --  Le Cejak • <-> 23:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	6	Well, I smiled. That's really it. See concept
Concept:	7	The whole concept of the man talking to students is ok, but it doesn't really work with the issue. I'd think that if you actually do a cannibal convention in the middle of the jungle - you might put it in a bit of a more interesting concept.
Prose and formatting:	7	a bit blocky. Try to separate the paragraphs further.
Images:	6	Nothing too exciting.
Miscellaneous:	5.2	avg. Plus, try to reposition the WHY? template. It's sort of in the middle.
Final Score:	31.2	I'd try for a different concept.
Reviewer:	~ 22:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)