From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 8 canids
|
| Nomination:
|
1234 ~  04:15, 21 January 2011
|
For Votes: 11
|
 Nom and for, I guess. I blame Olipro. This is all his fault.
1234 ~ 04:15, 21 January 2011
- For. Foxes have big heads. Especially foxes from Egypt. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:37, 22 January 2011
- For. Nice. --Dancing dude
  15:51, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I'd like to thank Lyrithya for making this a reality -- Prof. Olipro
 KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 04:37, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Good, even without Frunobulax.
 Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 05:03, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:15, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For. GEORGIEGIBBONS talk contributions 21:04, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
- FOR GOD DAMN-IT! Good pun. --
 01:38, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
- For. One of the best pics I've seen recently. Aleister 3:33 24-1-'11
- Errrrrr... ummm..... yeah, go on then. --Black Flamingo 22:58, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Za
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 15:37, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
 Against. a few quality issues. The image is too small, and the fox head is way too big. I would be happy if I got if as an image request, but its not quite at VFP quality. --Mn-z 14:33, January 22, 2011 (UTC)- Against MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:24, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 --Roman Dog Bird 21:28, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Okay, questions. The head's too big? Proportional to what, how is the head too big? For a fennec, it should if anything be bigger. And how is the image itself too small? It was larger than the default preview here. Just how big d'you want it for a feature? No, seriously, I'd like to know - I seem to be completely incapable of making feature-quality images.
1234 ~ 19:18, 22 January 2011
- To answer your questions, the head is too large with respect to the entire image. Looking closer, the head proper itself is probably proportional the body, but the large ears, combined with the how zoomed in the image is, make it look like the fox head is overwhelming the image. The fact that the ears are cut off may be contributing to that effect. With respect to image size, I think 480x600 is probably big enough. --Mn-z 02:39, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
- No, it's definitely too small for the body, though for the image as a whole, you may be right... but the image size, big enough for what? Although now that I've looked, you seem to vote against everything besides MS Paint drawings, so why am I even bothering?
1234 ~ 03:17, 25 January 2011
|
