Uncyclopedia talk:Poo Lit Surprise
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Poo Lit Surprise page. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
||
Collaboration[edit]
Anyone wanna collaborate with me?? Alright, form a line.--
Sir Sinner blah blah 10:39, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Very sorry but already booked up. Nice to see an old user pop back. Sir ScottPat (talk)
VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:05, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
Anyone else??-- Sir Sinner blah blah 17:36, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Some rule about judges and entering prevents me. Kick in an illustrated, new and/or rewrite while you're waiting for a collaborator anyway. So far any crappy illustrated one entered is likely to win. • Puppy's talk page • 11:40 16 Jun 2013
The thing is that I don't have a proper photochopping program. -- Sir Sinner blah blah 12:32, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Either you can download GIMP, or just use MS Paint. • Puppy's talk page • 12:44 16 Jun 2013
Best illustrated articles[edit]
If I put the article for the category "Best Illustrated Article", should the images be created by me or can they be just the real pictures form the Internet? Anton (talk) 12:43, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Created by you, otherwise it would be cheating. I would say but I am not running it. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:52, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks. Then I will nominate my "Ghost Writer" to another category. Anton (talk) 14:05, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
Results[edit]
Is there amy page with the full results of the contest??-- Sir Sinner blah blah 14:35, July 13, 2013 (UTC)
- You mean where all the articles are placed? At User:Romartus/PLS/Scoring. Anton (talk) 15:21, July 13, 2013 (UTC)
Has it started yet?[edit]
--Nikau (talk) 03:50, September 20, 2014 (UTC)
Do all the pictures in the Best Illustrated category have to be modified?[edit]
--Nikau (talk) 06:23, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know, sorry. Maybe someone who'll see me on recent changes will. In any case, your article deserves to be in the best article category, in my opinion. Anton (talk) 19:57, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
Judging[edit]
Apparently stuff is locked and judged from the 5th to the 11th, but that doesn't seem to have happened yet. Can someone enlighten me? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 22:03 9 October 2014
- I can judge if nobody else is able to, but it'll take me a week or so. --
22:17, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Everyone can change any category, unless he entered it. The current judges are Romartus and myself (and maybe Chiefjustice). The reason I am not posting any results is that I prefer reading all the entries before making any conclusion. I will soon be done, however, as I've read most of the articles. Anton (talk) 17:21, October 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Ah ok, that makes sense. I do notice the articles haven't been locked, though; not sure if that's not important or what--I figure Romartus or Chiefjustice was technically supposed to do it, if we were still doing it that way. Or maybe I just pay too much attention to detail, because I love picking nits. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 17:27 10 October 2014
- Or they believe that Uncyclopedians are very trustworthy people; Spike didn't even bother putting his entries into his own userspace. But then again, he is quite Spikey. Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 15:09, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Ah ok, that makes sense. I do notice the articles haven't been locked, though; not sure if that's not important or what--I figure Romartus or Chiefjustice was technically supposed to do it, if we were still doing it that way. Or maybe I just pay too much attention to detail, because I love picking nits. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 17:27 10 October 2014
- Everyone can change any category, unless he entered it. The current judges are Romartus and myself (and maybe Chiefjustice). The reason I am not posting any results is that I prefer reading all the entries before making any conclusion. I will soon be done, however, as I've read most of the articles. Anton (talk) 17:21, October 10, 2014 (UTC)