From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 6
|
| Nominated by:
|
Anton (talk) 16:04, April 10, 2014 (UTC)
|
For: 6
|
 Nom and for Funny! Anton (talk) 16:04, April 10, 2014 (UTC)- For. Haven't read the article yet but the concept's awesome and there has obviously been put a lot of work into it! And if Anton says the page is funny, I believe him. I'd also love to know how this is going to look on the Main Page if featured. My imagination's running riot! Or maybe not. Also, one thing I don't like, that has also been highlighted in the article's talk page, are the anime-ish drawings representing the article images but that's just my personal style, I know most people like those. Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 17:25, April 10, 2014 (UTC)
- For. Why doesn't this have more votes?? ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:23, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
- For. 117.197.109.195 06:06, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
- For. 37.85.72.99 01:31, April 20, 2014 (UTC)
- For. I liked this long ago. It can be on the front page by cutting and pasting a portion of the top of the page and putting it in on as a linked-file. Aleister 12:04 21-4-14
- For.. I thought this was both funny and original. I also wonder why this didn't have more votes? Phrank Psinatra (talk) 13:10, May 18, 2014 (UTC)
- For. Quirky and I have uploaded screen shots of two images so that this can be featured.
 RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:24, May 21, 2014 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
|
| Comments:
|
- The two main comedy concepts I think I can see here are writing an article in the style of what it is written about and parodying a typical Uncyclopedia article with the usual "porn" "Russian" "Oscar Wilde" memes. I'm afraid that I find that neither of them works that well in this article. I would actually consider re-writing it. Perhaps instead going for a theme like, "Drawing breath" or some other unexpected meaning of the word "Drawing" that catches the reader off guard. Sir ScottPat (converse)
   VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:56, April 11, 2014 (UTC)
- It's a nice idea, but surely this 'type' of article would be better suited to one based on handwriting? As a result, weak content aside, I think it's a bit confused and lacks visual cohesion. Thumbs up for the effort though!
 SIR MAC BOSWELL  [†] 08:14, April 11, 2014 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:22, May 25, 2014 (UTC)