Uncyclopedia:VFH/Sonic the Hedgehog

Vote	Score: 10 blue hedgehogs
Nominated by:	Mnbvcxz 15:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 15.5	Nom & for re-written by The-Real-Syko, this article manages to be quite funny without resorting to stupid gay jokes or fantardedness. --Mnbvcxz 15:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC) For: While I'm meh on Sonic (due to being old) I thought the biblical context was clever and well executed. Very "target audience"-- 16:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Strong For. You had me at "Zork." • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:31, Jan 2 For. 141.156.232.65 21:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Yummy For - I'm voting for myself and I'll throw 16-bit videogame characters at anyone who attempts to convince me otherwise. The-Real-Syko 22:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC) OH YEAH!! You had me at "Pokemon". Despite all of the Genesis and Mega Drive mentionables. \|Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Aussie CUN\|IC Kill \| 06:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC) For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:25, 4 January 2009 (UTC) For. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC) weak for. sure. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Fo' shizzle, as they say - Hey, it's a solid article. I'm really feeling it. And this dang picture is getting in the way. BlueYonder - CONTACT FOR!!!!!!!! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 05:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC) nice intro zac_archer@yahoo.com.au 03:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC) For I have to say, I laughed, and that is what matters. Could use a grammatical touch up here and there though. -RA HB 11:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC) For. And here I thought great articles on popular games were impossible. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC) For Per Necropaxx. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 03:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC) For. 173.15.128.81 14:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC) I barely understand it at all. For. –72.193.236.89 22:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5.5	Against. 81.129.233.254 16:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Weak against. As per Sycamore, this is a massive improvement. But, honestly, the Biblical-speak gets a little tedious, and the joke wears thin by the halfway mark. pillow talk 23:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Against. IronLung 05:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Against. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Against. 90.191.179.57 20:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Against. too much biblical talk for me, and i think it lacks the comedy that other articles provide 121.214.49.80 08:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Against. Excessively biblical and not really funny. I laughed at the Amy Rose picture though. Ryuinfinity 22:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments:	Abstain. - Not really feeling here, although it is a major improvement on the previous version. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Are you saying Sonic the Preggo is a stupid article? --Mnbvcxz 04:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Because it is a stupid article, and rather disturbing. --Mnbvcxz 20:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC) You're talking to yourself, M. Gis ym esiladnav! _LOB 21:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Comment - This seems to be one of those examples where real substance gets washed away by gimmicks. Definitely not a good sight. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)