From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 14 existentialist monologues
|
| Nominated by:
|
CrabPope 11:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 14
|
- Nom&For. Silence Karin! --CrabPope 11:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Existentialist For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have decided, in my typical classy fashion, to vote for my own article as I often have done. Oh, God, why must I always be reduced to this!? Have I no pride? Ah, no, I don't, for pride is a sin, but is not God Himself prideful? Is that not His nature? Why must it always be such that... —Sir Guildensternenstein 13:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- A depressing vote of FOR --Dame
  19:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- For --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 20:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Very. --monika 22:11, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 For. Reads like the lost chapter from a book I may have on my shelves somewhere. Interesting Crabby Papa !--Romartus 22:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)- For. Rabbi Techno
 kvetch  Contribs  FOXES 08:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Umm...For?. Yeah, that.
 Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Nice style! -- Meta 500 02:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Is good, yes? --UU - natter
 14:34, Apr 17
- For. Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 10:22, Apr. 18, 2009
- For. Nothing about Fanny and Alexander? I guess you're not British. Kakun
 nukaK 14:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- for. for. why must i vote for this, i do not know. perhaps it is only a desperate attempt to stave of the despair that has rendered me unable to capitalize properly. -optyc 18 April 2009
|
Against: 0
|
|
| Comments:
|
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Abstain. as per Nachlader. 