Uncyclopedia:VFH/Rebecca Sealfon

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rebecca Sealfon (history, logs)

Score: 19 fake words flawlessly spelled

Nominated by:

Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 03:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

For: 20
  1. Nom + For. The only reason I considered not nominating this was because people might not have known who she is... but then I remembered there was a video at the top that was both funny and informative. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 03:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. For --General Insineratehymn 03:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. For. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 04:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  4. sDig I also encourage a perusal of the external links, especially the Bee Haters one (thanks TKF!) --THINKER 11:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  5. F-U-U-R!!! Uuh...is that right? --THE 18:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  6. Good. Excellent buildup, leaving the end almost as ridiculous as insta-NRV stuff, yet still humorous. WOWZERS. "Spang" contribs | talk 19:05, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  7. "i love this"--68.62.236.55 03:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  8. For F! A! N! T! A! S! T! I! C! FANTASTIC! -RAHB 04:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  9. Frankly I think this woman should be voted Miss Uncyclopedia. SmackBot 10:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  10. Weak For. Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  11. Very weak For Needs more polishing in some places, but still good. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 22:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
  12. For --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us.png (TalkContribsCUNCapt.) 06:38, October 27, 2007
  13. For. Belated for. Took me a while to get round to this. Glad I finally did. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  14. For--Dr. Fenwick 04:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
  15. For - why not?--Sir Manforman CUN.png 01:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  16. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  17. 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon.gif(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 10:52, Oct 30
  18. Cheap Seats! YES! put it up right now. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.195.66.46 (talk • contribs)
  19. Phoar --Algorithm 20:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  20. Strong For - And if it doesn't go up soon, Ill log all my sockpuppets in to vote at least 3 more times.  –  FuhQ.gifUser talk:Zana Dark  ZDsig.gifUser:Zana Dark Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 01:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Against: 1
  1. Weak against I'm against YouTube in every form, especially in articles. The rest is good, though.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   23:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)  \
  2. Against - per EugeneKay. Articles should not rely on their YouTube videos, plus .gif images tend to annoy me--Sir Manforman CUN.png 19:04, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments:
  • The YouTube video is essential and hilarious. Whats there to be against? --THINKER 15:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Manforman Um listen, the article doesn't rely on the video. The video is an introduction to a person the reader might not know, and instantly puts the article into perspective. And you talking about articles relying on anything is comical. --THINKER 19:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH