Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive-2014-11

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.

🔒 Nobel Peace Prize H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -2 • voting closed
Delete (0)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Listy, quoty and not funny. Anton (talk) 14:30, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I rewrote the Intro and Anton199 and I have been slimming down the table. Already keepable. Spıke Ѧ 17:42 29-Oct-14
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Nomination withdrawn I agree - it's keepable. Anton (talk) 17:51, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Having just written Malala Yousafzai (and had a hand in Barack Obama), it might be good if this page became a sort of Disambiguation Page to our articles on actual award-winners. Failing that, it should be deleted as it is a huge list whose entries are name + wisecrack. Spıke Ѧ 14:55 29-Oct-14

That time I was nearly raped by an Oscar Wildebeest during my sojourn in wherever Oscar Wildebeests come from H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Sorry, Mhaille, but I really think the My sojourn formula here spoils the humour more than it benefits it. Anton (talk) 10:44, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Another copycat article from our Era of Imitation. Spıke Ѧ 11:23 30-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Considering how many "my sojourn" have ended up in VFD since I've joined (and all have retardedly long titles), can someone explain what they are? ConCass2 (talk) 15:20, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
    I answered on your talkpage. Anton (talk) 17:23, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The sojourn series is almost as bad as TYATU. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:05, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Sucks. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 03:29 31 October 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Short Circuit H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 2 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. No redeeming qualities. Spıke Ѧ 00:21 20-Oct-14
  2. With an article like this, I can't imagine that seeing the movies would make me think any better of it. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 18:55 20 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Nothing but sex. ConCass2 (talk) 20:12, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I'm not a fan of humour about sex but the immature part of my brain did make me laugh while reading this and I can't vote to delete something that made me laugh so I'll vote to keep. We ought to cater for all humour types as long as it is a parody. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:06, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Just wondering of you've even seen the movies, Spike? --ManiacJaSg.gif-Maniac1075Complain Here 03:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    I have not. I was not evaluating the movies. The Uncyclopedia page is a start-to-finish Anal Sex Joke. Spıke Ѧ 12:12 20-Oct-14
  • Yeah, try watching them!--ManiacJaSg.gif-Maniac1075Complain Here 23:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    No offence but... you are saying that the content of the movies somehow justifies the article's consisting entirely of sex jokes (and no, Spike, it's not just anal sex)? I can't really see that. Perhaps you could summarise the plot points you were parodying, for the benefit of us lazy bums who can't be bothered to watch the movies? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:53 20 October 2014
    Actually nevermind--I read Wikipedia's article, and I really can't see either the value of turning it into one long sex joke or the attributes of the movie that inspired you to do so. Sorry. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:58 20 October 2014
  • I still recommend watching the movie so you know what you're reading about. I can't see any reason someone who doesn't know what an article is about would find anything funny about it if they don't get it. If that's the case, I could spend the next week adding VFD to so many articles on this site.--ManiacJaSg.gif-Maniac1075Complain Here 09:41, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    I know perfectly well what I'm reading about, as I said above. I could guess what the movie was about from your article, actually. There is nothing that can justify turning it into what you turned it into. Nothing. Besides, the article shouldn't require intimate knowledge of the subject matter to be comprehensible; if it does, and if many readers haven't got that knowledge, it probably shouldn't exist. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 13:38 21 October 2014
    Yeah cause alot of people just read random articles they know nothing about. My point is, it's not funny to you few people, yet the ones I showed it to found it pretty funny indeed. I just don't agree that the small majority of voters against something is able to rule out an article as being unfunny, just because it's not the type of humor they enjoy. So what it comes down to, is if it doesn't please you couple of people who have time to vote for peoples work to be deleted because you don't personally like it, that means it should not exist for those who do. right? I dunno, maybe it's non Australians not getting Australian humor? Too bad there is no Uncylcopedia.com.au I guess.--ManiacJaSg.gif-Maniac1075Complain Here 15:33, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    Seems a large dollop of short pants to me but suggest you ask Frosty or PuppyOnTheRadio as they're from the Land of Oz for their views. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:15, October 27, 2014 (UTC)

Supergirl/classic/short

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I don't get the point of this page. We already have Supergirl and even Supergirl/classic. Also, not funny. Anton (talk) 14:36, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Cannibalism/mutilation Humor? Pages need subpages of subpages? Spıke Ѧ 14:44 30-Oct-14
  3. We do not need to melt our readers' brains. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:02 30 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Flush away. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:03, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. ConCass2 (talk) 07:45, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

UnTunes:At First I Was Afraid

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The author is treating a tricky topic, because getting blocked on Uncyclopedia has been treated and re-treated by many different authors, successfully or not. (Consider UnBooks:The sad fate of the banned users who escaped into a Sock puppet or Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal, for instance) Unfortunately, this article adds no humour value to dozens of other pages and isn't particularly funny, all in all. But it has good rhyme. Anton (talk) 14:10, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. No, it is Gaynor's original that has a good rhyme. This article reminds us that Christmas is approaching and, with it, marketeers' belief that tweaking a carol into a jingle is the world's least-heavy-lifting method of gathering a commission. (To be picky, he was actually blocked from Wikipedia, but documenting one's reaction is navelism, not good comedy.) To boot, author signs his work, and apologizes in-line for not creating an audio. Spıke Ѧ 14:23 26-Oct-14
  3. This poem is so straight. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 15:49 26 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Nope. ConCass2 (talk) 10:41, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I can survive this. Too oblivion and beyond! --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:07, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 A Midsummer Night's Dream H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The author was asked to fix this article, but he never did. Anton (talk) 14:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I would rewrite it, but I don't know anything about Shakespeare. ConCass2 (talk) 09:05, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Has some passing effort and few injokes. Good base for a rewrite. --Nikau (talk) 09:12, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Romartus is at work. Spıke Ѧ 17:14 3-Nov-14
Comments

🔒 Laptop H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 2 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Obnoxious teenagers who talk to their parents like shit were caused by laptops. This article begins with the premises that laptops are useful for viewing porn and are 'three dimensional magic box[es]', then goes on to discuss... essentially nothing. It has been almost the same since it was rewritten in 2007; prior to that, it wasn't much better (It is project with much effort, but it not marketable and usable. Then he exploded.). I have a replacement at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Laptop. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 06:34 19 October 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Intro also has a list of memes and a junk acronym; pointless Section 2 is overwhelmed by illustrations; then nothing but listcruft until the trite finale: Laptops are actually alien lifeforms. Proposed replacement is not ready.... Spıke Ѧ  10:47, 19 October 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Detailed editing comments moved to replacement article's talk page. Spıke Ѧ 17:04 19-Oct-14
  • Not sure if this is the right place to say this, but I've tried to follow your suggestions, Spike, and would appreciate it if you could have another look. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:08 23 October 2014
  • Replaced. Spıke Ѧ 12:03 5-Nov-14

George Foreman Lean Meat Fat Reducing Killing Machine H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Was linked to here from Alice in Chains, and as it turns out, lots of articles link to here as well. There may be some in-joke I'm not getting, but I'm not sure. ConCass2 (talk) 14:27, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
    The many links are because it is used in the template at the bottom of the article. If deleted, I'll fix that. Spıke Ѧ 14:36 26-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Except for a goofy name no one will look for in any encyclopedia, the article offers little humor beyond the concept and a contrived acronym. Spıke Ѧ 14:36 26-Oct-14
  3. This article is so bad, Uncyclopedia is going to take your name off it and toss it in the dustbin. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:24 26 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. All fur coat..--Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:08, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Think fast, douche-fag! H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The reader is a douche-fag. Haha! Anton (talk) 14:29, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Rants at the reader. Spıke Ѧ 14:47 29-Oct-14
  3. Think fast, douche-straight, or we'll delete your article! ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 01:18 30 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. For the drop. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:16, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Nude figure-skating

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A dumb ramble. Spıke Ѧ 11:41 22-Oct-14
  2. Fails to live up to the wonderfully silly premise of being naked in a situation that so clearly calls for warm clothing. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:24 24 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Doesn't deliver. Defrost. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:00, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Good idea, bad execution. --Nikau (talk) 09:13, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Doris Stokes H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage (was Marjory Basing-applepuddingstoke)

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I cannot tell from the pun title whom this article is supposed to be about. At least Move it so the potential reader doesn't have to guess the punch line first. Spıke Ѧ 19:48 3-Nov-14
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Made up name. I would prefer a parody of a real person involved with the mumbo jumbo.--Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:07, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (formerly Nominator) Rewritten. Spıke Ѧ 00:47 6-Nov-14
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Needs links from other pages, and maybe a little context in some of those which it mentions, but otherwise a funny standalone. TheCan (talk) 08:17, November 7, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I thought it might be this person - Doris Stokes but though the age is close, other details are made up. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:13, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
    It must be she. It is not a problem that the details are made up (and the current theme, about a woefully bad fortune-teller, is better than the truth: a garden-variety con artist). It is a problem to fictionalize the page title, as we are supposed to be "about" things people will actually look up. Spıke Ѧ 14:53 5-Nov-14
  • Rewritten and renamed. Spıke Ѧ 00:47 6-Nov-14

Good Electricity and Bad Electricity H Archive

Score: 3 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A tiny bit of pseudo-intellectualism. Might fit on Illogicopedia. Spıke Ѧ 14:04 12-Oct-14
  2. Agreed. I'll stick it there right now. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 18:36 12 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Not funny. ConCass2 (talk) 10:13, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Finland (Facts) H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A themeless and endless list of "facts," vanity, and inside jokes (including Finnish-language jokes) beckoning Anon like a Sandbox beckoning a passing cat. UN:LIST says that pages that are "nothing but lists" can be deleted administratively. (My recent enhancements reworded this rule but did not create the rule.) However, Rangeley created this lump of listcruft in 2006, so we ought to vote. Spıke Ѧ 14:21 28-Oct-14
  2. I'm sorry, was there a point here? I seem to have missed it. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 10:04 29 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Some of the "facts" were funny, but they should be written (in non-bulletpoint format) into the article on Finland. ConCass2 (talk) 10:18, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Listing badly. Sinking...sinking...--Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:14, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg BWEET! I made a local copy, so if there happens to be anything which can be expanded by someone who's never been there... In short... BWEET! TheCan (talk) 04:25, November 8, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

That Guy You Hate

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Gay humour. Anton (talk) 16:51, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh, you'd be wanting Hippocrates. He's the one who handles unbalanced humours. TheCan (talk) 04:28, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A non-encyclopedic chat about no one. The title plus the template ("This page...is completely worthless") plus the Intro ("let's do some quality bitching about that little fucker") should keep the reader from reading further. Spıke Ѧ 17:07 19-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg I'm gonna tear off his Penis and use it as a toilet plunger. Yet more disgusting gay-bashing. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 18:47 20 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Spurn Nothing here needs keeping. As the rant of a pathetic psyché it is... well, be sad. Rather than take that vitriolic approach, maybe something more resigned would work: Marvin the android, e.g. "Here I am, brain the size of a planet..." Maybe it'd simply be sadder yet. "Oh, God, I'm so depressed."
    Anyways, these 1st or 2nd person articles... They are like bonsai: ten times the work for one-tenth the result in concentrated form. Why aren't they all over at UnBlog? TheCan (talk) 04:28, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Everyone else has convinced me. Give me my dollar back. ConCass2 (talk) 10:38, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Strangely, the profanity knocks back the humour and makes the article less funny. But the subject has potential for a good page and doesn't look like something thrown together by an anon in 5 minutes. ConCass2 (talk) 20:36, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
    You mean it has potential for a good page, but it isn't one right now? If it's not good now, it shouldn't remain in its current state. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 18:47 20 October 2014
    I mean it can be redeemed with editing, without having to rewrite the whole page. I just couldn't word it right. ConCass2 (talk) 20:29, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Transsexual Beauty Pageant

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. {{Spork}}. One other page links to it. Although I think the topic could be quite comical, this page has no comedy whatsoever. Only original content is a list of winners not mentioned on Wikipedia. Deleting it would cause no loss of creative effort. TheCan (talk) 02:56, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A spork from 2006. There is no comedy concept except the notion that transgender is automatically funny; we have held that nothing is automatically funny. Actual work is always required. Spıke Ѧ 03:07 6-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. How in fuck's name did several admins revert vandalism on this article since 2006, yet never once realised it was entirely factual with no humour? ConCass2 (talk) 16:38, November 7, 2014 (UTC)
    Because Admins th'fuck are not omniscient of all cultures and contexts. That's why we vote on stuff. Spıke Ѧ 00:14 9-Nov-14
  4. Indeed, entirely factual, except that gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation are three separate things. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:51 7 November 2014
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Not as funny as a bearded Austrian in a dress. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:59, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Arsene Wenger H Archive

Score: 3 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I am nominating this to try to achieve improvements to, not deletion of, this article on the football manager by some editor Over There. I am not even sure whether getting thrown out of a cinema relates to anything. As it stands, the initial and recurring theme is Pedo/Anal/Rape/SexWithBlackMen Humor. Spıke Ѧ 13:17 14-Oct-14
  2. Can't we just delete this? I don't see anyone stepping forward to help. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 21:32 18 October 2014
    We can and will, if we prevail in the vote. Spıke Ѧ 01:27 19-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Something I could work on but this existing article is crap. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:58, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I'm not sure what's supposed to happen here, but you might be interested in this slightly more sanitary version. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 17:36 14 October 2014
    It is much cleaner, but it is also from 2007, and presumably omits comedy based on news in the last seven years — I assume there is some. Is there a Brit in the house who would like to do a merge? Spıke Ѧ 18:11 14-Oct-14

🔒 Owl H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. Wow, I just... don't even know where to begin. This article is almost entirely random nonsense; it barely has a concept--that of documenting and/or parodying the O RLY meme, which probably won't go over too well with some people here, and I'm not fond of it either--and that's only after I cut out a lot of it. Prior to my edits, it really was about nothing. A much more cut-down version may be found at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/scratchpad, which I'm still not too happy with (though you are welcome to say you want that as the replacement). I feel like we should have an article on owls, but I have no clue what it should consist of, and it's certainly not what we have now. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:30 20 October 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Anton (talk) 10:27, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Nominator cleaned it up a lot, but it's still a ramble. Spıke Ѧ 13:27 21-Oct-14
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Add a different template tag, maybe. I've thoroughly re-worked this. No offense to our Welshish friend Llwy-ar-lawr: I was on a roll and didn't look at your edit until I'd finished mine. My most common-denominator contribution yet, but a significant improvement if i may say so myself. TheCan (talk)
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (formerly Delete). It's fixed. Spıke Ѧ 00:03 13-Nov-14
Comments

🔒 The Who: My Re-Generation H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Even though it's a featured article, it's an exact copy of much of the page on the Who. ConCass2 (talk) 10:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. The FA is in better shape than The Who, which I would vote to delete and redirect to the FA. Spıke Ѧ 10:46 29-Oct-14
    I think it would be a better idea to paste the contents of the FA into the Who, since it is unnecessary to have. ConCass2 (talk) 21:44, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
    Agreed. No-one will search for The Who: blah blah blah --Nikau (talk) 12:14, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
    Indeed no; they would search for The Who and be redirected to the FA. Spıke Ѧ 23:30 1-Nov-14
Comments
  • The point I'm trying to make is, there is no need to have a section of "the Who" as a seperate article. Just edit the already existing Who article, as having an article on "the Who: [insert pun here]" is pointless regardless of whether or not a redirect exists. ConCass2 (talk) 12:08, November 2, 2014 (UTC)
  • Tagged with {{VFD}} and clock reset. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:29 6 November 2014
    I don't want to sound too precious but this is not "a copy" of anything. There was already an article on The Who when I wrote this. It wasn't very good. Someone has since replaced it with a copy of this article.--Sog1970 (talk) 20:55, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
    It is amazing what we learn by notifying the author through {{VFD}}! The input supports my point of Symbol keep vote.svg Keeping this one and voting to delete the pre-Sog edition of The Who, in favor of making it a redirect to the FA. Spıke Ѧ 21:50 6-Nov-14
    In that case, this article is unnecessary since it has been written into "the Who". ConCass2 (talk) 16:35, November 7, 2014 (UTC)
    Anyone else think it might be a good idea to delete The Who and move The Who: My Re-Generation to that title? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:47 7 November 2014
    Pretty much what I was going for. If you added an intro and some other sections, that would be a good compromise. ConCass2 (talk) 21:00, November 7, 2014 (UTC)

Consensus is that the featured content is not going away. Let's give authors 24-hour notice on the copy in slightly worse shape:

The Who H T D This article was previously a feature. Tag article

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Replace with the featured version. As the article is mostly about the band, and the song is only a small digression, it shouldn't require any editing. Spıke Ѧ 00:11 9-Nov-14
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Just paste the FA into this article, job well done. It's not quite delete-worthy. ConCass2 (talk) 10:35, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Under agreement with ConCass2. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 14:21, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Concurrence to replace the article with another article would not be Keep but Delete. Spıke Ѧ 23:55 12-Nov-14
  • Deleted. The Who: My Re-Generation moved on top of it; old name will still work. Spıke Ѧ 02:42 13-Nov-14

🔒 Tea H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (0)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Literally over 100 meaningless "varieties," short enough to convince every drive-by editor that he can add one. Proves that articles espousing the belief that "deliberately bad is funny" invite the belief that "more is better." Spıke Ѧ 11:56, 23:04 9-Nov-14 Rescinded. Improved by ConCass2 and by me. Spıke Ѧ 00:56 10-Nov-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I've removed the huge list. Don't know if this will leave any good left. ConCass2 (talk) 12:07, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
We can't lose tea! End of Civilisation!!--Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:57, November 9, 2014 (UTC)

🔒 Doody H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 2 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Complete Feces Humor, despite author's knowledge of the humanities. Spıke Ѧ 23:57 12-Nov-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Bury it: Hrm. Do a diff on the version from when it was Highlighted to now, and there's no difference, excepting one lame change. Eleven VFH in favor. I think scatological humor is funny when it's interjectional, sardonic, or surreal. This isn't even childish or puckish. Not one of his better contributions, I'm afraid. TheCan (talk) 02:21, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Sorry. It's written cleverly, but I don't see what's funny, apart from the tone, that mixes serious and childish. There might have been some parallel with the actual Solvay Conferences, but I couldn't find it. Anton (talk) 17:28, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I always thought that a featured article would automatically be kept, although this raises the question of how it got to that status in the first place. ConCass2 (talk) 21:23, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
    Times have changed... for the better. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 15:36 14 November 2014
  5. So people were making doodies during a physics conference. Nice. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 15:36 14 November 2014
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I wouldn't have voted this as a feature but I don't agree on having it deleted. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:33, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Self-keep. I'll admit this is not my best article and it relies heavily on stupid humor, but is that necessarily a reason to delete it? SPIKE's critique was "Complete Feces Humor." I have to ask, so what? Because it's not high-brow, it's therefore not funny? Humor is subjective and if someone doesn't find poop funny, no article about poop will make them laugh. Someone who would be willing to read an article called Doody would be expecting childish poop jokes and in this case, they would not be disappointed. Even Anton stated that although he didn't find it funny, he thought it was "written cleverly." Isn't that basically like saying "This is good for what it is, but I personally don't like it"? Clearly, 11 people (ok, 10 I won't include my own vote) thought that this succeeded at its intended goal: To make some poop jokes in a fresh, new way. If you don't care for this kind of humor, that's fine, but deleting it only prevents other people who like this kind of humor from getting a quick chuckle. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 08:05, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
    Written cleverly doesn't necessarily mean it's funny. Sorry, Xam. I just don't see what's funny there. You say it's stupid humour. Ok. But where is it? Saying that someone made a doody isn't humour, not even stupid, childish humour, although a few people might laugh at that. Anton (talk) 14:03, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
    If you want me to personally point out every joke that isn't "Someone made a doody," I will. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:25, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
    Ok, I admit that this article might have humour. Ok, has humour. I just personally don't find it funny. Anton (talk) 17:41, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
    So if you agree that it has humour but you personally don't find it funny, why vote Delete? I argue that one should only vote Delete if they think that there is no humour or the article is poorly written or something like that regardless of personal preferences. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:46, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Talk Mattsnow 23:40, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment I was under the impression that features couldn't be VFD-ed. Opens a big load of doody if they can be. --Nikau (talk) 17:03, November 18, 2014 (UTC)

🔒 Crimethink H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 1 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Foreign-language humor. This article is a study in writing a page in the style of the novel 1984 — but not in writing any original comedy. Intro also instructs other Uncyclopedians in the supposed proper use of the templates author created (and Anton199 has revised). Spıke Ѧ 00:06 16-Nov-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Send it to Room 101. ConCass2 (talk) 09:22, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  3. What's this, an attempt at summarising 1984 in Newspeak? I'm not seeing the humour. The only funny thing on this page, IMHO, is File:Unbook.jpg. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 17:28 17 November 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. On second thought, it isn't that bad. You just have to get into it, and Anton is right. The better stuff comes later. Perhaps, it could use a thorough editing and some rewriting but not deletion. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:54, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
    The article is unreadable. It's the same as the Pig Latin article that was on VFD just a while back - the humour is just the fact that it's unreadable. ConCass2 (talk) 10:24, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh? I can read it. If the problem is that you can't read it, I could provide a translated version as I did before. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 14:46 18 November 2014
    The problem is not that the obstacle is insurmountable. The problem is that the article is all about its own obstacle. Spıke Ѧ 15:29 18-Nov-14
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Political/social parody/satire is also funny. I think whomever wrote it did a very good job. It's along the lines of the Captain's Log article which is clearly derived and emulating a specific source but does definitely appeal to those who enjoy that source. Begege (talk) 04:37, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • It's pretty funny at some points. Just read it for long enough. Anton (talk) 17:48, November 16, 2014 (UTC)

Anarcho-fascism

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. It has it all: A tedious read without photos, hard to tell whether author is an ideologue or is ridiculing ideologues, had links to Facebook and YouTube apparently to hump an internet meme (until I deleted them), and is full of encyclopedia cliches. (Check out Section 2: "Other critics may have alleged....Many believe....It has been suggested....But clearly it is very likely possible...Legend has it..." Utterly not worth streamlining. Spıke Ѧ 21:20 13-Nov-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The intro is supposed to lure the reader in to the rest of the article. Here, the intro is literally factual, and the rest of it I can't tell if it's trying to be funny or just as factual. ConCass2 (talk) 09:25, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Incoherent. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 08:06, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Whatever. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 17:14 17 November 2014
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Talk about hammering a 'joke' into the ground. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:41, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Despite my warning, Llwy-ar-lawr has been trying to streamline this. But what you wind up with is an "ism" whose only humor is its impossibility — that is, the fact that it is a page no one will look up — unless you came here from Facebook etc. to see if there is an article on this offsite meme. Spıke Ѧ 17:35 14-Nov-14

About

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Seriously? Spouting random gibberish isn't humour. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag.jpeg 20:26, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A lot of word-association, sometimes descending into numb lists, with no theme holding it together. Spıke Ѧ 20:30 17-Nov-14
  3. Was there a point here? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 01:43 18 November 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Pretty stupid. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 04:59, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. What's it all A-Boot, Alfie? --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:45, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • 'Numb lists'? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 01:43 18 November 2014
    Numb, without feeling, without a sense of what anything is doing there. Spıke Ѧ 01:53 18-Nov-14

Vietnamese H D

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --Precious Star (talk) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. Spıke Ѧ 18:05 20-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. ConCass2 (talk) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Just when you think all the ancient junk has gone...this one pops up! --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:43, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. An attempt to look nice at the expense of anything remotely intelligent. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:02 22 November 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Chav/Translations H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I don't think this is particularly funny or worth keeping. Anton (talk) 17:28, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Various editors (overwhelmingly Anons) have used this overlong list to catalog the "funny" things that chavs say rather than write original humor. Spıke Ѧ 17:52 21-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The same joke repeated hundreds of times --Precious Star (talk) 19:26, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Flypaper. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:46, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Can't tell if all this stuff is even about chavs at all. In any case, it's not of much use. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:06 22 November 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Sudden Instant Death Syndrome H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. From the redundant and made-up title to the random lists of nonsensical items such as masturbating kittens, this article is about essentially nothing. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:25 23 November 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Dead Baby Humor has to be especially good to be funny. This article, by comparison, uses most of the trite themes in the book: Author discussing himself, author apparently with A.D.D., "nobody knows anything," listcruft, memecruft, history-of-the-future, and another list of Notable Sufferers, inviting cyberbullying and not being disappointed in the response. Spıke Ѧ 01:16 23-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Stupid. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:14, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. HowTo:Not write an article ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 06:04, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Not funny at all. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:54, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • It hardly discusses babies anyway. Only two paragraphs at the end. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 01:30 23 November 2014

🔒 Samuel L. Vacuum H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 1 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Article begins with an unimpressive sentence, explains in tedious detail why said unimpressive sentence is a comedic masterpiece, and ends with a gratuitous instance of {{USERNAME}}. Was voted onto the front page by a group of editors who are mostly no longer here. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:32 23 November 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Navelism. Yes, it was a feature, a VFD moved to VFH by fallen-away editors who reveled in their freedom to feature a thoroughly bad article. That was not amusing the reader but self-amusement, a prank not a joke, and that goes for the article as well. No one will look for this transformation of Samuel L. Jackson's name, no one will laugh at the emphasis on Jackson's blackness, and after that sentence, no one will enjoy author's essay about trying to write an article. Spıke Ѧ 01:21 23-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Considering that there are already two save votes, this article probably won't go. But I reckon that this article would be much funnier if it were actually about Samuel L Vacuum as opposed to plain navelism along the lines of "here's why it's funny". ConCass2 (talk) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    It was about Samuel L. Vacuum before it was rewritten to be about how terrible that concept was; see Comments. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 17:03 23 November 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg A Classic. Hilarious and clever. This is not about writing an Uncyclopedia article. It's a parody of comedy writing in general and critique of the overuse of memes in place of actual jokes. This was one of the first articles I read on Uncyclopedia and one of the first to get me interested in this site, so I would think that there are others who find it amusing as well. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:21, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    Mocking bad writing by imitating it simply produces a bad page. Your apparent knowledge of the point of this pointless article is not evident by reading the article. Spıke Ѧ 14:36 23-Nov-14
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg New low. Deleting featured articles? Petty petty. I don't particularly like it but enough people voted for it to highlight the site that you can't outright delete it. --Nikau (talk) 06:28, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    Some featured articles can be utter shite. This one isn't terrible, but if it was exactly as it is now and didn't have the "featured" at the top, it would be VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    This vote ought to be disregarded because it is based not on the quality of the article, but on an objection to the policy. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 17:02 23 November 2014
    More problematic is disparaging fellow voters ("Petty petty"), a trend I thought had stopped when Shabidoo threw his Wikia pass-key down the gutter. However, you started it with the comment below, which suggests that a goal was to purge the site of a specific author. I famously enforce civility not with creative vote counting but with the ban-stick. Spıke Ѧ 17:25 23-Nov-14
    I find it ironic that you would call Nikau's comment one that disparages other users and at the same time call my opinion of the article "apparent knowledge" that "is not evident by reading the article." That's a tad belittling, wouldn't you say? --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:17, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    No I wouldn't, not ironic, not disparaging, and not belittling. I asserted that your statement about the point of the article is not evident from reading the article, that's all. Spıke Ѧ 22:18 23-Nov-14
Comments
  • While it was created by Evilcorporatemetaljesus, it was rewritten by Mrmonkey72. Adding this because its original creator was mentioned in another discussion as having written this and other poor-quality articles. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:40 23 November 2014
  • The current policy at Uncyclopedia is to protect featured articles. If anyone feels strongly about this then a forum can be created to discuss it there. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:36, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  • 24 hours hasn't yet elapsed. Other articles are allowed more time; shouldn't this stay open a tad longer? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:11 23 November 2014
FA's don't go to VFD; that is a long standing policy. This matter can be discussed in a forum if required. I would vote to keep this one regardless as evidently lots of people found it funny at one point. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:39, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://uncyclopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive-2014-11&oldid=6185056"