Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 13

July 2011

Writer of the month

Mattsnow (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• Nom + For 4 features in what 2 months? Writes heaps all of high quality. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:18, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
• -- 15:43, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
• A fine chap. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 19:29 Jul 13 2011
• :) --ShabiDOO 18:49, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• Nom + For Guildy was Noob of the Month February 2009 - but this month he is hitting (and exceeding) "40" FORTY FEATURES. Which is rarely achieved by anyone in Uncyclopedia's history. I really like Mattsnow; I love to encourage new talent and I'll gladly vote for him next month. But for July I must take my hat off to Golden Guildy.--Funnybony  12:04, Jul 2
• For. Solid performer, bearded. Sings some. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:35, July 8, 2011 (UTC)

ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

• Nom. As per what was said on the Foolitzer page. --Black Flamingo 13:23, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
• 'Snow has got the brains, Guildy's got the brawn, but Justice has the news. I've said before that the Signpost has made Worst Reflections, one of my old favorite pages, almost completely redundant through its sheer weekly newsly digest power. To go so long at such a persistent clip, even when straw-grabbing for newsy things becomes necessary, takes chutzpah. This Guy. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:15, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. I would also like to add that anyone who's had a Chief review will know how good of a writer he is. I would rather read those over many of our articles. --Black Flamingo 19:09, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For, per BF and the other alphabet soup above. ~  Talk 23:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
• Mwu Hu Ha Ha HAAAA! BAAA Ha ha ha ha haaaaar he he he heeeee, ahhhhhhhhhohhhhhh, he he he errrrr. Oh, where was I, uhhhh For.. Quality Mofo. Should release the shackles of the Unsignpost and write some 'proper shit'. HauntedUndies. 14:05, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
• Yeah lets do this. Nameable • mumble? 18:28, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
• At this point I'm only doing controversial things so I can read hilarious articles in the UnSignpost about me. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 19:56 Jul 26, 2011
• For. He write sentence with words.

1234 ~ 18:45, 31 July 2011

• For. One UnSignpost to rule them all. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:48, 31 July 2011

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom and for. I don't want to be self-centered and vote for myself, and Killer Froggy has written some great articles in the last while at a furious pace: Two and a Half Men and Dave Chappelle among others. Plus taking care of all his admins duties. That's dedication. Mattsnow 16:11, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

  All these TKF noms are a bit redundant, I feel. He'll win WotY without a doubt, and if he doesn't I'll eat my hat. Good thing I wear a pork pie. Flamingo out. --Black Flamingo 18:44, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

• Nigga what - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at20:08, Saturday 23 July 2011 -
• Against. Not funny at all.  TALK  FRESH MEAT  ♥ talk to me 21:17 27 July 2011 Try again, but without the attitude. --Chiefjustice32X 07:49, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the month

Lyrithya (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 11 Skins

• Nom & For her work in making Vector a reality... In the words of Mr.T "I pity the foo' who thinks they can hold a candle to this" -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 23:29, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Also for making those templates. And the logos. And improving a bunch of JS things. And so on. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 00:01 Jul 01, 2011
• she is one wacky, ko0-koo-ka-jooky chick --Roman Dog Bird 02:20, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

HEY?! What happened to this month?! It's still July! 1234 ~ 23:41, 30 June 2011

What? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 00:01 Jul 01, 2011

The Time in Greenwich is the real time, and the time in Greenwich is currently GMT+1, so fuck the server. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 03:55, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

I'm more concerned with the "still July" part of that. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 04:18 Jul 01, 2011

I thought you could only win this once... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:48, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Wait, what month is it?

1234 ~ 09:05, 1 July 2011

January? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:57, 1 July 2011

• For making that Vector thingy, and for all the PRs she's done lately. You rock, Lyrithya! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 12:53 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. 20:56, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. good job w/ vector. Kakun  nukaK 03:04, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes. Lyrithya Appreciation Day. --Gamma287 02:45, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
• This guy I like his name. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 05:40, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
• For.. + 1 for Lythrthayaththa errrrr, you know the one. HauntedUndies. 09:33, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
• For. She hacked up a fucking skin and it works and she's not winning this? This is the worst thing since they stopped slicing bread. ~  Talk 23:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
• For. Not against the others on here, but the skin thing makes her deserving for me. Nameable • mumble? 18:34, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Per stuff. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:52, 31 July 2011

Frosty (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +15

• Gotta be fair: Frosty hasn't won this yet, and he's just been trucking and not stopping for a while now. Plus he's like nine years old or something. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:38, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Let's be honest, Lyrithy..Oh well fuck it, as per TKF. -- -> That's Poop Man Poop 05:47, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Yeah, or something -- 21:11, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Defrost him again Frosty: Vandal slayer. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 21:01, 3 July 2011
• For. If this guy wasn't here, there would be so much vandalism going through the cracks. Sometimes recent changes is clogged with articles with 2 changes: A vandal IP and Frosty. I like Lyrithya too, but great job, snowman! Mattsnow 11:11, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Services rendered for sniffing out sockhogs, AnotherSock et all. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:37, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes. I know nothing about administration stuff though apparantly frosty is the shiz these days. I like Frosty's energy and attitude. Hes a nice guy and funny and all over the place. Also, he flies on a magic carpet and throws pennies to poor children in Switzerland. --ShabiDOO 18:47, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
• For months now, Frosty has been doing wonderful stuff in and out of the bedroom. --Black Flamingo 19:02, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He's alright.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:57, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
• no u - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at04:04, Saturday 09 July 2011 -
• this kid is "it" if you know what i mean --Roman Dog Bird 08:12, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
• FOR This world spins on the axis of a snowman! mAttlobster. (hello) 15:19, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
• Fourteen. ~ T. (talk) 16:52, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
• Abstain. Very deserving, but I'ma have to vote for Lyri this month. ~  Talk 23:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
• Aye. Lyrithya is a wombat. --Chiefjustice32X 08:40, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Frosty deserves it -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:02, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

JackOfSpades (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• I'm going to keep nominating this guy until something happens. I like him.

1234 ~ 09:05, 1 July 2011

• For. I really have a soft-spot (huh?? I mean, ahh, soft-heart) for Lyrithya. And I agree with her on this.--Funnybony  09:23, Jul 1
• Next month, fo sho. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:55, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:42, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
• For. I can't vote myself without looking like a total dick and Lyrithya has already won this award before, plus he's apparently useful. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:09, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

N00b of the month

Xamralco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

• Nom + For Ok I promise this is my last nomination, but this guy wrote a damned article, but guess what? He picked himself up again and turned it into a descent article! I like that sort of attitude. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:58, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
• Strong for. Xamralco knows HowTo:Replace bread with something else and that is a rare talent. Mattsnow 21:10, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
• This nigga good -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:26, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes Very impressive debut article and even more impressive total silence from him before he arrived. --ShabiDOO 10:08, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
• Hmm, an awesome user who probably deserves this, putting a fair amount of work into articles and whatnot, as well as aiming to improve off what it does initially... that, that I like. Very promising, and good works already. Do keep it up. For, per what I just said and also because this is the sort of thing people tend to notice less, but without which the wiki wouldn't be going anywhere.

1234 ~ 18:59, 30 July 2011

• Okay, this guy wrote this hilarious article and it got featured! How is he not winning? --JohnNickelson 19:34, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not Charlie Sheen -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:46, July 31, 2011 (UTC)

DFly (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom Written a descent article, and seems like a nice guy. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:55, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

HauntedUndies (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

• Nom A good UnNews reporter and a cheerful noob, he is eligable just (he would be ineligable for nomination in 2 days) Anyway vote for this guy. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:01, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Yup, works for me. -- -> That's Poop Man Poop 14:41, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Showing great promise and with a memorable moniker too. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:39, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes. A wonderful character. -- 02:19, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He punched me in the face, and for that, I vote for.-- Talk - Contributions 12:51, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Quickly becoming a staple over here at UnNews. ~  Talk 23:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
• For. Don't know him too well, but he sounds nice. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 23:37, 21 July 2011
• For. Giving me someone to biopic in a few months. Keep it up. --Chiefjustice32X 08:38, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He is a nice guy. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 07:39, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
• Someone else as tactless as I am... that should no go unrewarded. But seriously, this one also does good works, less in the writing, but in voting and discussion and more general maintenance, and though I have to recognise the other guy's writing, I hope this one keeps it up as well; the stuff isn't any less important. But this one also already has more votes.

1234 ~ 18:59, 30 July 2011

Lyrithya (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: Wombat

• I'm a noob!

1234 ~ 05:30, 2 July 2011

Not being Rcmurphy ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:33, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: BIG NOOB

• Nom Nom Nom. Rcmurphy fun fact: Did you know that RC created Zork? Look at the page history, brotha. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 05:55, 2 July 2011
• Endogenously ambiguous abstain. --ShabiDOO 10:09, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: an indeterminate number of rcmurphys +1

• NOM NOM NOM. Per this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:09, 30 July 2011
• Whoops, I thought the nominations for July would only start in August, otherwise, I would have nominated Mhaille sooner... Also, that thing he did on Forum:FFW 2011 was very noobish; he should have known that it would be misunderstood as an attempt to exempt himself from the rules and thus cause an uproar. And finally, he says that he always wanted this award, which is noobish enough per se, because we all know how little awards matter. Schamschi, 14:19, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Again. Not being Rcmurphy. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:29, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Meh. Mhaille is exempt from the rules. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:25, 31 July 2011

August 2011

Writer of the month

Mattsnow (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 11

• Nom + For He has more featured articles to his name than non featured article. He has like 8 features! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:47, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For.. Mattsnow is an advanced cybernetic FeatureBot sent back in time to terminate boredom and if he's got time, Sarah Connor's unborn foetus. Lets face it, he's gonna win this thing sooner or later so we might as well give it to him so he can get back to shovelling the snow out of his driveway. HauntedUndies. 10:35, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
• For..--Funnybony  11:29, Aug 9
• Matthew Snowman is the writing person of the month. --Black Flamingo 23:12, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
• For. For this guy? Absolutely. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   16:30, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
• Oh... Yeah and shit... -- 14:35, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
• For Though people who have 'Matt' in their username are quite incapable of turning it into a good one, this user smacks out the funnies hard. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:49, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
• For. A hard month to pick, all the nominees deserve this gold-plated cup. Matt is a very good writer and has been consistently good since he came on board this sinking ship. And his name is Snow, which reminds me of the North Pole, so I'll vote for him. Aleister 15:18 20something-8-'11
• Lalalalalalala. --ShabiDOO 21:34, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:32, August 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Wait, I haven't voted for this guy yet? This is outrageous! -- 20:57, August 25, 2011 (UTC)

  You have voted already, silly! It's gonna be your turn next month if I can have my say! Mattsnow 15:01, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

• He write good.

1234 ~ 17:50, 27 August 2011

• For. Arrived as an ED refugee, and now he's a high class Uncyclopedian. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 17:54, 27 August 2011

Neopowell (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• Snow needs some competition, and he's got a fierce one in Neopowell. Neo doesn't fuck around with his articles. The goes deep with all of them, making sure a single ass isn't left halved, and his efforts always have hilarious consequences. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:05, August 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Epic writer. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:10, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
• dicks lol - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at05:33, Monday 22 August 2011 -
• He write food. Er... good. I meant 'good'. Didn't I?

1234 ~ 14:42, 24 August 2011

Magic man (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom+For, This guy is on fire as of late! Visual puns and Hypnotist come to mind! He did hypnotize me so I nom him, therefore going against myself! :D Mattsnow 12:51, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
• He write food.

1234 ~ 17:50, 27 August 2011

Uncyclopedian of the month

Lollipop (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +9

• Nom + For Alright he ain't leaving. But still. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:26, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He really deserves this before he leaves. -- 18:01, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Without a doubt! LOLLLLLLLLLIPOP!!! --ShabiDOO 18:46, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
• FOR. I bet he threatened to quit if he didn't win this lol. Joking, your weird dedication deserves a reward, Lollipop! :P Mattsnow 01:29, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
• For. I'll gladly vote for Shabidoo next month.--Funnybony  11:36, Aug 13
• Comment. Normally I'd just vote for Shabidoo since he's generally a decent, helpful bloke, if incredibly stubborn, but as almost all I have right now are reasons why Lollipop shouldn't win this, at least not this month... I have to put my vote here. Lollipop, you keep saying you want to move past your noobishness and annoyingness, then do it, please. Stop dicking around, attention-mongering and making side projects, and grow up a little, like you keep insisting you will. Pull that off and you'll have my vote with gratitude.

1234 ~ 17:14, 17 August 2011

• You cannot vote against users for User of the Month. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:37, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

  Actually, you can, but for the sake of all our pigeons I'll make it a comment instead. Now give my your head pigeons.

1234 ~ 15:16, 21 August 2011

• Ya, rly. ~ 18:00, 08/17/2011
• For. He may be a little childish lollipop, but I must admit he's good at what he does.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 22:49, August 17, 2011 (UTC)
• *for while at the same time picking my nose and rubbing it on candy, lay candy in street in a location Lollipop frequents. Lollipop picks up candy, eats it, and looks for more on ground. Finds many pieces that other people have left* A very good, playful, and friendly user, he has brought along many noobs to non-noobhood while at the same time patroling the site and catching vandals, moron edits, and many other useful things. A gem within a pile of coal which are the rest of us. Well deserved. Aleister 15:21 20something-8-'11
• For. –Hi! — 04:06, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Shabidoo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6

• His grammar is still kind of funky, but he's had his head in the right place for a while now. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:55, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Yeah yeah. And thanks for keeping up with the pee maintenance. --Black Flamingo 13:09, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:43, August 17, 2011 (UTC)
• For being Uncyclopedia's voice of reason this month. (Lollipop, you get my vote next month, for sure!!) -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:00 August 18, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Stand up for Your Rights. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:13, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
• For –Hi! — 04:07, August 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. I would like to state for the record that this guy is really annoying. Sometimes it's not helpful. Sometimes it is. I have no idea which is which. But in my brief time on Uncyclopedia, I have rather come to appreciate the difficult people, not the idiots, but the ones that look into things and ask questions and maybe drive off some of our adminatti in the process but also pave the way, psychologically, for things that would never happen otherwise... asking questions is good. I will stand by that like a barrel of molasses stands by whatever it leaked on. Shabidoo, keep questioning, please.

1234 ~ 15:16, 21 August 2011

• • If anyone finds my jokes, randomness etc. annoying on their talk page, just say so and I'll happily stop, if anyone finds something annoying (in terms of humour and joking around) on a forum, just say so. If anyone ever finds anything annoying in terms of policy, ideas, disagreements...then thats probably a good thing...probably most of the time...probably for most people. Or something like that. I don't need an uncyclopedian of the month award to feel valuable here...though your votes are apreciated. --ShabiDOO 01:49, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
• Spiritual for!!! What a great user, productive up and down the line. Should be Writer of the Month too very soon (if he hasn't been already). Only reason I'm no voting for him is Lollipop has a pop thing at the end of a stick, so I have 'pop envy. Aleister 15:26 20something-8-'11

N00b of the month

Mattityahu (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 11

• Nom+for. I'm nomming him despite the fact he stole my userpage template (which I stole from Lollipop, so I guess I can't complain!) This guy already has a good article in the short week he's been here and is a cheerful guy. Keep it up, Mattityahu! Mattsnow 18:15, August 9, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Had a nice chat with him on IRC. He has good patience and has good writing skills. Also, I forget where I got that userpage template from. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 18:20, 9 August 2011
• For. I'm a noob too. His confidence article is hilarious and something to really aspire! --User:Leibo
• For. This guy is the greatest thing to happen to uncyclopedia since Oscar Wilde added his standup routine consisting solely of Russian reversals. He brings a fresh new style and humility that was sorely lacking. Though he is still a noob, one day he hopes to rise through the ranks to be someone who has actually seen a boob in person. He also apologizes for stealing templates, his skills are limited to being hilarious, humble, and repetitive, but not tech savy. --Mattityahu 19:21, August 9, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He shits all over Rc. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:20, August 10, 2011 (UTC)
• For. First person in a long time whose article did not make me want to kill myself for doing pee reviews. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   14:09, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
• For. What is it with Matts? Matt Lobster, Matt Snow and now Mattityahu. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:16, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
• For. If there is a Matt to vote for, I'll be there. Aleister 15:27 20something-8-'11
• rthhhhhhhhh=swe4 34fer --Black Flamingo 16:43, August 27, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Mattityahu this is your mother. Where have you been? Why won't you call?
• For. Very nice article -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:45, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom + For Because he hasn't won this since 2008. I mean he is our resident noob! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:38, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Forever. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:15, 15 Aug

October

Writer of the month

Magic_man (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9.314001

• Nom+For. It's easy: he had the best article of the month 2 times in a row a little earlier with Visual puns and UnNews:Old people more likely to die, study shows. And he types with his toes. Mattsnow 05:50, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Absolutely. Over due!!! (so much so he deserves .000001 extra :) --ShabiDOO 14:22, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Subliminal stimuli - his next big hit, trust me. --Black Flamingo 22:44, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Does it work for you the way Lyrithya made it? Because it doesn't for me. -- 00:33, September 3, 2011 (UTC)

• For.Absolutely. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   01:43, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Xam is on a roll, but Magic has it coming. Good show, sport. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:41, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Why yes. For. Yes. Plus π in the decimals. Mini-golf –Hi! — 02:40, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Magick If he was any more magick/magic there would be ladies sawed-in-half dropping like flies all over the place. He's stayed around long enough to become a very very good writer, and that's the trick in this business bucko. Nice work. Aleister 18:10 7-9-'11
• Xamralco will have his day in the sun, provided he wears an appropriate level of sun protection. This month, it's Magic Man. Poorah! I understand and I wish to continue. . 09:34, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:48, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

Neopowell (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom. He write good. He seem to always write good when he write. It impressive.

1234 ~ 15:11, 2 September 2011

• For. Game of Thrones remains an impressive article to start off a career as a contributor here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:17, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
• Everybody who's nominated right now deserves this award. But I'm voting for Neopowell specifically to even out the scores a bit. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:20, 1 October 2011

Xamralco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom. This relatively new n00b pulverized his n00bishness with Why?:IPs can't edit the main page, HowTo:Replace bread with something else and Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. Great writer! Mattsnow 23:28, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:11, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Also, Who would think of a username like that? –Hi! — 01:43, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • It sounds like a construction company or something. Drugs can make you choose the weirdest names! Mattsnow 05:37, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the month

Shabidoo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: Naked

• Nom + For Lovely chap. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:41, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He sounds like he cares about the place. Mattsnow 07:12, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Why not? -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 2 September 2011, at 07:14
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:05, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For! –Hi! — 15:02, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. It is a joy to vote for Shabidoo. Seriously. He's done so much that there are no words to say how much. Well, maybe Lots. Or glumpet. Aleister 18:11 7-9-'11
• For. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 14:05, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Wot?

1234 ~ 00:21, 13 September 2011

• For. Does good deeds. --Chiefjustice32X 14:38, September 13, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He's a continental breakfast. --Black Flamingo 16:26, September 13, 2011 (UTC)
• For. --Scofield & Friends 12:47, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Cause this dude kept called me awesome many times even though I haven't heard from him in a year! --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master
• For. Duh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:08, 16 September 2011
• For. He's cewl. -- 00:03, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
• For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 10:35, September 27, 2011 (UTC)
• For. 08:00, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
• For Definitely. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:55, September 30, 2011 (UTC)

83.134.118.209 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3.5

• Nom + For. 83.134.118.209 20:44, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
• Strong for. --Black Flamingo 20:59, September 26, 2011 (UTC) Can only vote once, despite this candidate's overwhelming promise. --Chiefjustice32X 08:11, September 27, 2011 (UTC)
  • Where would Uncyclopedia be if 83.134.118.209 was not around? I dare not think about it. Mattsnow 08:31, September 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. Strong for. (This is only a comment though, as I already voted in the previous section.) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:17, 29 September 2011
• For. I have limited internet time today...but I had to vote for 83.134.118.209 as he made me the person I am today. 83.134.118.209 is generous and caring and only goes to his day job for 2 hours a day so that he can dedicate his life to giving all uncyclopedians the gift of spelling corrections and humorous posts on talk pages. Three cheers for 83.134.118.209. --ShabiDOO 09:09, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
• oh wow --Roman Dog Bird 09:16, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
• He's mackin' all the fly girlies. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at01:41, Saturday 01 October 2011 -

N00b of the month

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• BECAUSE!!! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:02, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
• Lol dicks. -- 04:04, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
• Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 14:06, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

Iwritewhatiwant (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

• Err, Rcmurphy jokes are OK, but we should encourage this guy to hang around. He likes to write what he wants but I'm sure we could beat that out of him (with constant beatings). He'll be writing fart and rape jokes in no time. He's been working on this so check it out. I understand and I wish to continue. . 04:52, September 19, 2011 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:23, 19 September 2011
• Yes, this guy is showing more promise than, uh, something very promising. --Black Flamingo 13:31, September 19, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Because of whatever BF was trying to say. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   13:58, September 19, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Great prose on that UnNews. Made me cry. Mattsnow 08:28, September 20, 2011 (UTC)
• F☭Я! 09:03, September 30, 2011 (UTC)

October

Writer of the month

Xamralco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• Nom He has at least 3 great articles, including Why?:IPs can't edit the main page. Mattsnow 16:32, October 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:32, October 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He has 3 great perky breasts, including that one with the hairy mole and dinner plate sized nipples. I understand and I wish to continue. . 10:10, October 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Strong with the force this one is...--Sycamore (Talk) 21:21, October 10, 2011 (UTC)
• This guy is a good one yes -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:39, October 10, 2011 (UTC)
• For Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 19:07, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Best new writer in a long time. -- 20:13, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Its a tough decision, but at the end of the day...everyone is forcing me to chose, and since there is a gun pointed to my head, I'll pick the guy who did the "why IPs cant edit the main page". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
• Stupid comment: This guy writes food.

1234 ~ 05:47, 27 October 2011

• ForMmmm hmmm---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 16:05, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
• Er, I meant 'good'.

1234 ~ 16:27, 28 October 2011

• Yeah, sure you did.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 16:35, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

• The future of Uncyc is in good paws. --Black Flamingo 11:53, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

HauntedUndies (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7

• Nom and for His article Skeleton warrior is just awesome, and he has more great ones in his library. Mattsnow 16:32, October 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Both are great candidates. I hope we can tie the two up (in a non-literal way, though I'm all for tying them up literally too). —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:37, 1 October 2011
• You have turned out some great stuff my main man :) --ShabiDOO 23:28, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Just to keep it sporty. Both of these guys seem like Hemingway compared to this guy. Aleister 18:38 14-10-'11
• For. For the original user name alone. Best one this year. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:46, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
• For. What Socky said. Also, why is everyone all of a sudden using ols for these things? People can and do vote against from time to time. Or leave stupid comments.

1234 ~ 05:47, 27 October 2011

• For --Nikau 01:02, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

Weebils (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom An oldy but a goody, put up for your reading enjoyment. One of three writers (I know of) who have over 200 UnNews articles - Composure1 and Funnybony being the other two, and among the three only FB has a WOTM cup. If ye haveth some reading time, well worth the look-see. Aleister 18:58 14-10-'11

Uncyclopedian of the month

Magic man (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 17

• Nom + For How has he not won this yet? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:26, October 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Per Frosty. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:28, 1 October 2011
• For. Per Socky. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 16:37 October 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Per Sly Fox. Mattsnow 16:46, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For.Remember that guy who quietly does all sorts of stuff, and writes good articles and does stuff. What was his name again? ;) --ShabiDOO 17:39, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
• this guy's pretty cool --Roman Dog Bird 03:31, October 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For.--Funnybony  17:07, Oct 4
• For. Per ChiefjusticeDS. --Black Flamingo 03:12, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
• He's like the only one who hasn't won this yet for no reason at like all -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:22, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
• Burn! Burn! Burn! --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 10:19, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
• Why yes... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:54, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
• And now the other shoeth falls Aleister 18:40 14-10-'11
• Yeah---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:40, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Per Yeah. I understand and I wish to continue. . 12:12, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
• This vote makes absolutely no fucking difference in the world! Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM)
• For. Pulls all the right rabbits out of the hat. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:43, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
• This shouldn't be happening now. Should have happened before. For... uh, reasons.

1234 ~ 05:43, 27 October 2011

62.141.53.224 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1.5

• Nom + For --62.141.53.224 05:04, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
• Spiritual for. --Roman Dog Bird 05:06, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes. -- 22:05, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
• Abstain. Never gave me cake.

1234 ~ 05:43, 27 October 2011

N00b of the month

Featured User (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

• Nom + For He wrote an article anonymously that made it to VFH, then he registered. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:57, October 3, 2011 (UTC)

  Seems legit. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:35, October 3, 2011 (UTC)

• For. That's no mean feat. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:48, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
• For.. What featured page was it? --BLU Scoutgineer 18:51, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
• For.. A user who is featured on the main page. Featured User 22:55, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Mattsnow 23:14, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:18, 31 October 2011

rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: nil

• Nom and against. This page needs more variety, but... eh.

1234 ~ 05:36, 27 October 2011

• Strong for. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:57, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

*We're at an all time low. For Mattsnow 00:40, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

November

Writer of the Month

Nikau (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom. I already used my vote, but this guy is on fire, he has written RoboCop, Indiana Jones and the Typical University-level Dig and 1969 24 Hours of Le Mans. Mattsnow 17:35, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
• For.--    20:47, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
• Next month! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:45, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Great run of articles, all of them very different. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:29, November 21, 2011 (UTC)

Lyrithya (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6

• Nom and for. Lyrithya has written zero great articles but has already won this award several times. Let's re-address the balance. --Black Flamingo 23:50, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For, but only because I predict she will hate winning this award. And also whatever about being a great writer and all that bullshit, whatever. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:35, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:24, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
• Hasn't won this yet'???! WTF!!!? Sixteen thumbs up.
  
  Aleister 16:24 14-11-'11
• For. Per Aleister. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:28, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
• *shifty eyes*-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 14:58, November 27, 2011 (UTC)

Black flamingo11 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5 insert funny score quantifiers here

• Nomination + For. Fella does nothing but put other people to shame. His writing ain't bad, either.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Nov 4 '11 9:21 (UTC)
• For. I could vote for any of the other three deserving candidates who haven't won this award...but I could also vote for Black flamingo, who makes me laugh more than anybody else on the website, hands down. So I guess I didn't have as much of a choice as I thought I did. -RAHB 08:26, November 10, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Im vaguely aware of his existence. He's also culpable of numerous quality article writey thingy things. I understand and I wish to continue. . 12:56, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Join the ranks of DrStrange! -- 22:08, November 13, 2011 (UTC)

*For. BF is a super talented writer. Ive been fairly amazed by how easily he can turn out a funny, witty, coherent and evocative/provocative article in an hour, in a day, while he's brushing his teeth. Ive translated one of his articles, and as hard as I tried I simply coudn't get the same soul into it. Itll be a giant loss if he gets to be admin and writes less. Why oh why oh why did I write so much passive agressive wankery on vfs? Why did I insist so much? --ShabiDOO 18:27, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

• All due respect to Flamingo, who I would usually vote For on any award at any time in a heartbeat, but I think I've sort of become one of those WotM purists all about the "give some dudes who haven't won this yet their due." Flamingo could win this every month of the year and I'd be fine with it, but right now we've got three still-writing users (Lyrithya, Undies, and Nikau) who haven't had their moment in the sun yet. I'm sure this guy might have a tiny bit of luck winning some writing award or another in two months, anyway. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:30, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

  Another salient point from TKF. Except for the WotY comment, maybe I'll be runner-up to him but anything else would be absurd. I urge you all to vote for one of the others, all of whom have worked hard and written some great articles, be it recently or historically. --Black Flamingo 20:14, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

  TKF, your point is very well pointy, and I totally get what you mean, but I simply see it differently. BF has won before, but before I came here, and I still think he's spat out great articles since and I only feel like voting for him this month. We could also consider what I was talking about before...having a unlife time unachievement award...which can be awarded every three months to a established user for all their writing, winnable only once. OR something like that (a way to counter the whole getting rid of awards at the moment). --ShabiDOO 21:29, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

  You forgot the most important thing. He also smells good.

1234 ~ 21:30, 15 November 2011

• He smells like smoked salmon marinating for ten months in a barrel of vinegar. Mmmmmmmmm. --ShabiDOO 00:43, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

• He's actually written stuff this month, is amazingly, and is one of very, very few writers worth giving this to twice.

1234 ~ 06:12, 27 November 2011

HauntedUndies (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom + For He's pretty funny. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 09:23, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Great writer and nice guy! Mattsnow 05:15, November 8, 2011 (UTC)

MeepStarLives (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• Nom and For People used to bitch about HerrDocktor and Slackerboy not getting WotM, and they only had five or so featured articles. Now we have fewer writers and yet Meep hasn't won this award with at least 6 featured articles. Wheeeeeee. --Nikau 04:17, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
• For.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:07, November 10, 2011 (UTC)
• For A hilarious writer who wrote great articles and numerous got featured. I would be more than glad to vote for this hilarious guy. -- 15:13, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
• Wall Street Kid and Xkcd were both fenomenal articles. --ShabiDOO 13:44, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• Nom and for It's been too long since he got this. --ShabiDOO 16:04, November 1, 2011 (UTC) sorry Cheif, I though Mattsnow had already got it. I'm amazed he wasn't nominated earlier. Next month for sure. --ShabiDOO 03:02, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Yeah, he was 4 the last time he won. Considering he's now at the old folks home, I agree with Shabidoo. Mattsnow 16:09, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Mattsnow (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +18

• Matt writes, is around, is hecka friendly as shit, and most importantly, is Canadian. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:48, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Ja He's a pretty cool guy.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:43, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
• I guess so he's alright ... I suppose. --ShabiDOO 03:02, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. More deserving than that other twat. --Chiefjustice32X 15:01, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For I don't know what a Canadian is though. Sounds a little grimy. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:06, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

  They say that when you leave canada...you forever have a bit of hay stuck to the bottom of your toes. --ShabiDOO 22:26, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:21, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Against. I hate him and I'll never forgive him.

1234 ~ 23:14, 2 November 2011

• Just kidding; he's awesome and I love him.

1234 ~ 23:14, 2 November 2011

• For. Not only has he inspired and encouraged me to keep writing, but he's also apologised publicly for doing so. An overlooked potential future contender for sysophood, and I mean that (but let's not get ahead of ourselves). --Black Flamingo 00:59, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He's funny, a good writer, nice, and, best of all, funny. -- 01:07, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
• He's Uncyclopedian. He also edits monthly. What more can I say? I understand and I wish to continue. . 08:37, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:51, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
• yeah -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 20:19, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For. If he wasn't so new, he should be an admin. He obviously knows what he does, he's patient, and friendly. Always willing to sort out drama calmly. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 4 November 2011, at 20:25
• For. I've noticed that in addition to being a cool and sexy all around user, Mattsnow is one of the friendliest guys around. That counts even slightly more than that cool and sexy stuff for me. Although being sexy is always a nice touch. -RAHB 08:31, November 10, 2011 (UTC)

  RAHB youre also a pretty sexy stud. I don't know if you are cool...I'd have to see you in person to know that, but there is no doubt that you are a sexy beast. --ShabiDOO 06:52, November 18, 2011 (UTC)

• For. He's super-friendly. That's more than good enough for me! We need more friendly people. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 06:23 November 18, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Very helpful and his articles made me laugh. I see no reason why not to vote for him. -- Cool I Get A Signature 14:36, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Matt Snow was at Enchilada Dirigibles until that site was demolished by its management. Came over here and stayed. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:36, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Just saw this and had to leave my ma's deathbed to vote (Fuck her and the horse she rode out on). I'd go back to see her one last time but I'm kind of hungry. YAY MattSnow, one of the bestest guys whipping it out in cyberspace. Aleister 16:52 23-11-'11
• For. Because. 2K12_DAN.VRS 01:32, November 26, 2011 (UTC)
• Unnecessary for vote-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 14:59, November 27, 2011 (UTC)

N00b of the Month

Jonny appleseed (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6

• This guy's allegedly new. He wrote an article. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:57, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Welcome aboard Jonny! Good article! Mattsnow 11:50, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
• Two Three good noobs but Chairs made me giggle. --Black Flamingo 22:25, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:14, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
• For: It doesn't really look like voting for myself will help at this point, but I will anyway. Jonny appleseed 00:02, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
• For. I have decided I like this fellow, although I'd have liked him better had he not voted for himself. Although I guess they all voted for themselves; he just did it later than the others, which may count for something after all. I guess. Maybe?

1234 ~ 00:35, 30 November 2011

PopGoesTheWeasel (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +12 popped out votes

• We should encourage the n00bs that write articles to stick around and write better ones. His first article although a bit odd at times can be improved and I see potential in this guy, I hope he decides to stay! -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 00:24, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
• I can vote for myself, right? Cool. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 08:16, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
• I saw him make an edit once... -- 22:04, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
• For I sense he could bring balance to the force. --Chiefjustice32X 16:43, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Hilarious, great writer. I can vision next momnth where i'll be voting for him on WotM. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 15 November 2011, at 21:52
• For. Up and Down the City Road, In and Out The Eagle, That's the Way the Money Goes...etc. I know City Road and The Eagle but haven't seen a weasel about until now.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:39, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
• For. If Romartus stamps his approval on someone I am contractully obliged to go along. Aleister 16:44 23-11-'11
• For. I like his name. Hee hee hee. 2K12_DAN.VRS 01:29, November 26, 2011 (UTC)
• For. A good guy at stuff. I understand and I wish to continue. . 09:48, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Weasel-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 11:31, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
• For. And a BIG one. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 12:12 28 November 2011
• I've heard of em'... --Gamma287 01:11, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

ZTVstudios (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom. He has written articles. Good ones. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:38, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
• For Thanks for the nomination. --ZTVstudios 22:35, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
• I gotta give my for to this guy (or woman pretending to be a guy, or woman who is a woman and never stated she is a woman or miniture monkey that jumps on the keyboard and mouse when its owner is away or dual existant creature from the fourth dimention that types 3 dimentional articles to entertain himself while he contemplates the 5th dimention) because I like his style so far (he hasn't even finished either of the two articles he (or he/she or she or it) is working on but has already made a brand for him/himher/her/it-self (look at user page) and he/heshe/she/it is full of crazy energetic creativity. He/heshe/she/it might have to try to make cuts and stuff in his/hisher/her/its articles but I would bet my five euros (or dollars or yen or wakisaki) on this person/thing. --ShabiDOO 03:26, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

December

Writer of the Month

Nikau (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +13 flaming Formula 1 race cars

• Nomination and For. If he doesn't win for December, I'm suing. Why? Because he rocked the month of November, that's why.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 12:42 (UTC)
• For. Obvious choice. Some 5 years later, he decided to come back. Great inheritance. Mattsnow 12:58, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He's the only writer on Uncy who gets time and a half for holidays. Aleister 18:00 1-12-'11
• Fuck this guy -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:10, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:22, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For Nikau deserves Writer Of The Month more than me. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 11:39, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 12:54, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
• Strong for. I really hope you stay, man. --Black Flamingo 13:28, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:33, 4 December 2011
• For. Unpredictable with choice of articles. That's a good thing! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:32, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Nikau writes stuff that is good. Nikau is a user who is nice. Nikau is a user that eats meat. Nikau is a user when he logs onto the wiki. Nikau is a member of this community who makes it better one article at a time. (And this is why my five insights make my vote worth +5). --ShabiDOO 02:25, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
• Certainly. -RAHB 03:37, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:22, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Mattsnow (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nomination. Does he do anything other than crank out features with his BFF? He does? Crap. Maybe I shouldn't have nominated him, then.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 12:42 (UTC)
• I already won this, so I cancelled the nom but thanks for the thought, Bizzee! Mattsnow 12:58, December 1, 2011 (UTC)

PopGoesTheWeasel (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom + Encouraging For I like this guy, although new, he writes and manages to make me laugh. This should give him plenty of incentive to keep at it! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:38, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For I don't think I'm doing this right. Would it kill you guys to make voting a little simpler? I'm voting for you anyway, and you better appreciate it, 'cuz your articles are nice. ^.^ J.D. Soufi 20:18, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Bizzeebeever (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +9

• I really like the cut of this guy's jib. He got us namespaces, kinda. Plus, he's a well rounded Uncyclopedian and always around and I think friendly? I like him. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 10:44, December 1, 2011 (UTC)

  You know, giving away an award this cheaply sorta devalues it. :D  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 14:13 (UTC)

• I iz agree. Mattsnow 10:48, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Yeah alright. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:33, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:08, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Bizzeebeever wins a new award every month. Soon enough, we'll have to start inventing new ones to keep him satisfied. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:49, 4 December 2011
• For.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:56, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
• I can go for that. -RAHB 23:57, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes. --Gamma287 00:45, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
• What's this I see? A bandwagon? Ah, well deserved roll in the hay, that. Aleister 19:11 12-12-'11

Pentium5dot1 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• This bloke is incredibly good at going unnoticed, having managed to avoid this award for the past... well, while, but I suppose that stands to reason considering all of what he does seems to be behind-the-scenes stuff - fixing up articles, cleaning up links, keeping track of UN:REQ stuff, that kind of thing, no drama. Noticed or not, what he does is useful, and should you come across him you'll even find him to be a polite and lovely person, which around these parts is downright unusual.

1234 ~ 10:21, 3 December 2011

• This nigga never won??? Awwww shiiiitttt.... -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:12, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:37, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
• Oh, and for.

1234 ~ 22:36, 4 December 2011

Xamralco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Also a decent, useful bloke, this one's department is more new pages patrol and the like, along with some article poking and cleanup and rewriting along the way. We could use more of that, the flat-out rewriting. Entire wiki, practically, needs that...

1234 ~ 10:21, 3 December 2011

• For. A most useful slime beast. --Chiefjustice32X 13:06, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Next month for sure. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:28, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
• Per Frosty. Not now. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 04:21, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

Ferric AlFerrous (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Dis dude. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:54, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Next month! I like this guy (he did a pee review) but if my calculations are correct he'll be eligible next month (by which point I do hope he'll have done another pee review) so I'll wait until then. --Black Flamingo 21:19, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Jonny appleseed (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +10 popped out votes

• Nom + For I have decided to vote for Johnny appleseed and I also make the decision to nominate him. So...this is my nomination and vote for Jonny appleseed ... right here ... in this vote and nomination. --ShabiDOO 13:33, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. I didn't vote last month because I couldn't decide between Pop and him. Now that Pop's already won, this guy definitely gets my vote. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:43, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:46, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Good call. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:05, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
• For.. --Black Flamingo 21:19, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Featured User 04:39, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
• For..Yes, hell yes. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 17:57, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Have seed will travel. Aleister 19:14 12-12-'11
• For. Perhaps this one will bring balance. --Chiefjustice32X 11:11, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Ooh, look! It's a bandwagon! -- 2K12_DAN.VRS 21:49, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Gleep (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom and for This guy wrote 4 good UnNews, see his contribs! Mattsnow 13:19, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
• For. I like this guys articles...--Sycamore (Talk) 22:51, December 7, 2011 (UTC)